To evaluate the single and combined diagnostic performances of CT and MRI radiomics for diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (AP). We prospectively enrolled 78 patients (mean age 55.7 ± 17 years, 48.7 % male) diagnosed with AP between 2020 and 2022. Patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) within 48-72 h of symptoms and MRI ≤ 24 h after CECT. The entire pancreas was manually segmented tridimensionally by two operators on portal venous phase (PVP) CECT images, T2-weighted imaging (WI) MR sequence and non-enhanced and PVP T1-WI MR sequences. A matched control group (n = 77) with normal pancreas was used. Dataset was randomly split into training and test, and various machine learning algorithms were compared. Receiver operating curve analysis was performed. The T2WI model exhibited significantly better diagnostic performance than CECT and non-enhanced and venous T1WI, with sensitivity, specificity and AUC of 73.3 % (95 % CI: 71.5-74.7), 80.1 % (78.2-83.2), and 0.834 (0.819-0.844) for T2WI (p = 0.001), 74.4 % (71.5-76.4), 58.7 % (56.3-61.1), and 0.654 (0.630-0.677) for non-enhanced T1WI, 62.1 % (60.1-64.2), 78.7 % (77.1-81), and 0.787 (0.771-0.810) for venous T1WI, and 66.4 % (64.8-50.9), 48.4 % (46-50.9), and 0.610 (0.586-0.626) for CECT, respectively.The combination of T2WI with CECT enhanced diagnostic performance compared to T2WI, achieving sensitivity, specificity and AUC of 81.4 % (80-80.3), 78.1 % (75.9-80.2), and 0.911 (0.902-0.920) (p = 0.001). The MRI radiomics outperformed the CT radiomics model to detect diagnosis of AP and the combination of MRI with CECT showed better performance than single models. The translation of radiomics into clinical practice may improve detection of AP, particularly MRI radiomics.

To develop a deep learning (DL) model based on ultrasound (US) images of lymph nodes for predicting cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM) in postoperative patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Retrospective collection of 352 lymph nodes from 330 patients with cytopathology findings between June 2021 and December 2023 at our institution. The database was randomly divided into the training and test cohort at an 8:2 ratio. The DL basic model of longitudinal and cross-sectional of lymph nodes was constructed based on ResNet50 respectively, and the results of the 2 basic models were fused (1:1) to construct a longitudinal + cross-sectional DL model. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess US features and construct a conventional US model. Subsequently, a combined model was constructed by integrating DL and US. The diagnostic accuracy of the longitudinal + cross-sectional DL model was higher than that of longitudinal or cross-sectional alone. The area under the curve (AUC) of the combined model (US + DL) was 0.855 (95% CI, 0.767-0.942) and the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.786 (95% CI, 0.671-0.875), 0.972 (95% CI, 0.855-0.999), and 0.588 (95% CI, 0.407-0.754), respectively. Compared with US and DL models, the integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification improvement of the combined models are both positive. This preliminary study shows that the DL model based on US images of lymph nodes has a high diagnostic efficacy for predicting CLNM in postoperative patients with DTC, and the combined model of US+DL is superior to single conventional US and DL for predicting CLNM in this population. We innovatively used DL of lymph node US images to predict the status of cervical lymph nodes in postoperative patients with DTC.

Accurately evaluating bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA) is crucial for diagnosing osteoporosis and selecting implants for hip arthroplasty. Our goal was to measure the BMD differences between sides, examine contributing factors, and identify the optimal side for BMD assessment in these patients. We analyzed 108 women with unilateral hip OA. Bilateral hip BMD was assessed automatically through quantitative CT (QCT) utilizing a validated, deep-learning-based approach. We evaluated BMD variations between the OA and healthy hips across total, neck, and distal regions. To determine their contributions, we analyzed factors, including patient demographics, Crowe classification, Bombelli classification, knee OA status, hip functional score, and gluteal muscle volume and density. Furthermore, we examined how side-to-side BMD differences influenced osteoporosis diagnosis using T-scores based on QCT. The average BMD on the OA side was 6.9 % lower in the total region, 14.5 % higher in the neck region, and 9.4 % lower in the distal region than on the healthy side. Contributing factors to the reduced BMD in the OA hip included younger age, Bombelli classification (atrophic type), and significant gluteal muscle atrophy. Diagnoses from the OA side revealed lower sensitivity (61 %) than those from the healthy side (88 %). Analysis on one side alone yields a more precise osteoporosis diagnosis from the healthy side. Nonetheless, bilateral BMD assessment remains crucial, particularly in younger individuals and those with atrophic OA types. Although based on QCT, our findings support bilateral analysis by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for these patients.

The assessment of neoadjuvant treatment's response is critical for selecting the most suitable therapeutic options for patients with breast cancer to reduce the need for invasive local therapies. Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is so far one of the most accurate approaches for assessing pathological complete response, although this is limited by the qualitative and subjective nature of radiologists' assessment, often making it insufficient for deciding whether to forgo additional locoregional therapy measures. To increase the accuracy and prediction of radiomic MRI with the aid of machine learning models and deep learning methods, as part of artificial intelligence, have been used to analyse the different subtypes of breast cancer and the specific changes observed before and after therapy. This review discusses recent advancements in radiomic MRI models for presurgical response assessment for patients with early breast cancer receiving preoperative treatments, with a focus on their implications for clinical practice.

To evaluate the performance of a deep learning (DL) model in an external dataset to assess radiographic knee osteoarthritis using Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades against versatile human readers. Two-hundred-eight knee anteroposterior conventional radiographs (CRs) were included in this retrospective study. Four readers (three radiologists, one orthopedic surgeon) assessed the KL grades and consensus grade was derived as the mean of these. The DL model was trained using all the CRs from Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) and validated on Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) dataset and then tested on our external dataset. To assess the agreement between the graders, Cohen's quadratic kappa (k) with 95 ​% confidence intervals were used. Diagnostic performance was measured using confusion matrices and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. The multiclass (KL grades from 0 to 4) diagnostic performance of the DL model was multifaceted: sensitivities were between 0.372 and 1.000, specificities 0.691-0.974, PPVs 0.227-0.879, NPVs 0.622-1.000, and AUCs 0.786-0.983. The overall balanced accuracy was 0.693, AUC 0.886, and kappa 0.820. If only dichotomous KL grading (i.e. KL0-1 vs. KL2-4) was utilized, superior metrics were seen with an overall balanced accuracy of 0.902 and AUC of 0.967. A substantial agreement between each reader and DL model was found: the inter-rater agreement was 0.737 [0.685-0.790] for the radiology resident, 0.761 [0.707-0.816] for the musculoskeletal radiology fellow, 0.802 [0.761-0.843] for the senior musculoskeletal radiologist, and 0.818 [0.775-0.860] for the orthopedic surgeon. In an external dataset, our DL model can grade knee osteoarthritis with diagnostic accuracy comparable to highly experienced human readers.

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used in radiotherapy to image patient configuration before treatment but its image quality is lower than planning CT due to scattering, motion, and reconstruction methods. This reduces the accuracy of Hounsfield units (HU) and limits its use in adaptive radiation therapy (ART). However, synthetic CT (sCT) generation using deep learning methods for CBCT intensity correction faces challenges due to deformation. To address these issues, we propose enhancing CBCT quality using a conditional denoising diffusion probability model (CDDPM), which is trained on pseudo-CBCT created by adding pseudo-scatter to planning CT. The CDDPM transforms CBCT into high-quality sCT, improving HU accuracy while preserving anatomical configuration. The performance evaluation of the proposed sCT showed a reduction in mean absolute error (MAE) from 81.19 HU for CBCT to 24.89 HU for the sCT. Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) improved from 31.20 dB for CBCT to 33.81 dB for the sCT. The Dice and Jaccard coefficients between CBCT and sCT for the colon, prostate, and bladder ranged from 0.69 to 0.91. When compared to other deep learning models, the proposed sCT outperformed them in terms of accuracy and anatomical preservation. The dosimetry analysis for prostate cancer revealed a dose error of over 10% with CBCT but nearly 0% with the sCT. Gamma pass rates for the proposed sCT exceeded 90% for all dose criteria, indicating high agreement with CT-based dose distributions. These results show that the proposed sCT improves image quality, dosimetry accuracy, and treatment planning, advancing ART for pelvic cancer.

We aimed to develop and validate an Artificial Intelligence (AI) model that leverages CCTA and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images for automated analysis of plaque characteristics and coronary function. A total of 100 patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography, OCT, and CCTA before discharge were included in this study. The data were randomly divided into a training set (80 %) and a test set (20 %). The training set, comprising 21,471 tomography images, was used to train a deep-learning convolutional neural network. Subsequently, the AI model was integrated with flow reserve score calculation software developed by Ruixin Medical. The results from the test set demonstrated excellent agreement between the AI model and OCT analysis for calcified plaque (McNemar test, p = 0.683), non-calcified plaque (McNemar test, p = 0.752), mixed plaque (McNemar test, p = 1.000), and low-attenuation plaque (McNemar test, p = 1.000). Additionally, there was excellent agreement for deep learning-derived minimum lumen diameter (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.91, p < 0.001), mean vessel diameter (ICC 0.88, p < 0.001), and percent diameter stenosis (ICC 0.82, p < 0.001). In diagnosing >50 % coronary stenosis, the diagnostic accuracy of the AI model surpassed that of conventional CCTA (AUC 0.98 vs. 0.76, p = 0.008). When compared with quantitative flow fraction, there was excellent agreement between QFR and AI-derived CT-FFR (ICC 0.745, p < 0.0001). Our AI model effectively provides automated analysis of plaque characteristics from CCTA images, with the analysis results showing strong agreement with OCT findings. Moreover, the CT-FFR automatically analyzed by the AI model exhibits high consistency with QFR derived from coronary angiography.

Our previous study showed that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (MRI-OA), based on a Delphi approach, in combination with radiographic OA (ROA) had a strong predictive validity for the progression of knee OA. This study aimed to compare whether the combination using traditional prediction models was superior to the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) models. Data were from the Tasmanian Older Adult Cohort. A radiograph and 1.5T MRI of the right knee was performed. Tibial cartilage volume was measured at baseline, 2.6 and 10.7 years. Knee pain and function were assessed at baseline, 2.6, 5.1, and 10.7 years. Right-sided total knee replacement (TKR) were assessed over 13.5 years. The area under the curve (AUC) was applied to compare the predictive validity of logistic regression with the LightGBM algorithm. For significant imbalanced outcomes, the area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR) was used. 574 participants (mean 62 years, 49 ​% female) were included. Overall, the LightGBM showed a clinically acceptable predictive performance for all outcomes but TKR. For knee pain and function, LightGBM showed better predictive performance than logistic regression model (AUC: 0.731-0.912 vs 0.627-0.755). Similar results were found for tibial cartilage loss over 2.6 (AUC: 0.845 vs 0.701, p ​< ​0.001) and 10.7 years (AUC: 0.845 vs 0.753, p ​= ​0.016). For TKR, which exhibited significant class imbalance, both algorithms performed poorly (AUC-PR: 0.647 vs 0.610). Compared to logistic regression combining MRI-OA, ROA, and common covariates, LightGBM offers valuable insights that can inform early risk identification and targeted prevention strategies.

To develop dynamic MRU protocol that focuses on the bladder to capture ureteral jets and to automatically estimate frequency and duration of ureteral jets from the dynamic images. Between February and July 2023, we collected 51 sets of dynamic MRU data from 5 healthy subjects. To capture the entire longitudinal trajectory of ureteral jets, we optimized orientation and thickness of the imaging slice for dynamic MRU, and developed a deep-learning method to automatically estimate frequency and duration of ureteral jets from the dynamic images. Among the 15 sets of images with different slice positioning, the positioning with slice thickness of 25 mm and orientation of 30° was optimal. Of the 36 sets of dynamic images acquired with the optimal protocol, 27 sets or 2529 images were used to train a U-Net model for automatically detecting the presence of ureteral jets. On the other 9 sets or 760 images, accuracy of the trained model was found to be 84.9 %. Based on the results of automatic detection, frequency of ureteral jet in each set of dynamic images was estimated as 8.0 ± 1.4 min^-1, deviating from reference by -3.3 % ± 10.0 %; duration of each individual ureteral jet was estimated as 7.3 ± 2.8 s, deviating from reference by 2.4 % ± 32.2 %. The accumulative duration of ureteral jets estimated by the method correlated well (with coefficient of 0.936) with the bladder expansion recorded in the dynamic images. The proposed method was capable of quantitatively characterizing ureteral jets, potentially providing valuable information on functional status of ureteral peristalsis.

This study aimed to compare the quality and readability of the responses generated by 3 publicly available artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots in answering frequently asked questions (FAQs) related to Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (OMR) to assess their suitability for patient education. Fifteen OMR-related questions were selected from professional patient information websites. These questions were posed to ChatGPT-3.5 by OpenAI, Gemini 1.5 Pro by Google, and Copilot by Microsoft to generate responses. Three board-certified OMR specialists evaluated the responses regarding scientific adequacy, ease of understanding, and overall reader satisfaction. Readability was assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) scores. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to compare the scores assigned by the evaluators to the responses from the chatbots and professional websites. Interevaluator agreement was examined by calculating the Fleiss kappa coefficient. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of scientific adequacy. In terms of readability, chatbots had overall mean FKGL and FRE scores of 12.97 and 34.11, respectively. Interevaluator agreement level was generally high. Although chatbots are relatively good at responding to FAQs, validating AI-generated information using input from healthcare professionals can enhance patient care and safety. Readability of the text content in the chatbots and websites requires high reading levels.