This review synthesizes current evidence regarding optimal breast cancer screening strategies for women with dense breasts, a population at increased risk due to decreased mammographic sensitivity. A systematic literature review was performed in accordance with PRISMA criteria, covering MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, and Web of Science until May 2025. The analysis examines advanced imaging techniques such as digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), assessing their effectiveness in addressing the shortcomings of traditional mammography in dense breast tissue. The review rigorously evaluates the incorporation of risk stratification models, such as the BCSC, in customizing screening regimens, in conjunction with innovative technologies like liquid biopsy and artificial intelligence-based image analysis for improved risk prediction. A key emphasis is placed on the heterogeneity in international screening guidelines and the challenges in translating research findings to diverse clinical settings, particularly in resource-constrained environments. The discussion includes ethical implications regarding compulsory breast density notification and the possibility of intensifying disparities in health care. The review ultimately encourages the development of evidence-based, context-specific guidelines that facilitate equitable access to effective breast cancer screening for all women with dense breasts.

To analyze the methodological quality of studies on deep learning (DL) in rib fracture imaging with the Must AI Criteria-10 (MAIC-10) checklist, and to report insights and experiences regarding the applicability of the MAIC-10 checklist. An electronic literature search was conducted on the PubMed database. After selection of articles, three radiologists independently rated the articles according to MAIC-10. Differences of the MAIC-10 score for each checklist item were assessed using the Fleiss' kappa coefficient. A total of 25 original articles discussing DL applications in rib fracture imaging were identified. Most studies focused on fracture detection (n = 21, 84%). In most of the research papers, internal cross-validation of the dataset was performed (n = 16, 64%), while only six studies (24%) conducted external validation. The mean MAIC-10 score of the 25 studies was 5.63 (SD, 1.84; range 1-8), with the item "clinical need" being reported most consistently (100%) and the item "study design" being most frequently reported incompletely (94.8%). The average inter-rater agreement for the MAIC-10 score was 0.771. The MAIC-10 checklist is a valid tool for assessing the quality of AI research in medical imaging with good inter-rater agreement. With regard to rib fracture imaging, items such as "study design", "explainability", and "transparency" were often not comprehensively addressed. AI in medical imaging has become increasingly common. Therefore, quality control systems of published literature such as the MAIC-10 checklist are needed to ensure high quality research output. Quality control systems are needed for research on AI in medical imaging. The MAIC-10 checklist is a valid tool to assess AI in medical imaging research quality. Checklist items such as "study design", "explainability", and "transparency" are frequently addressed incomprehensively.

Breast cancer detection through mammography interpretation remains difficult because of the minimal nature of abnormalities that experts need to identify alongside the variable interpretations between readers. The potential of CNNs for medical image analysis faces two limitations: they fail to process both local information and wide contextual data adequately, and do not provide explainable AI (XAI) operations that doctors need to accept them in clinics. The researcher developed the MammoFormer framework, which unites transformer-based architecture with multi-feature enhancement components and XAI functionalities within one framework. Seven different architectures consisting of CNNs, Vision Transformer, Swin Transformer, and ConvNext were tested alongside four enhancement techniques, including original images, negative transformation, adaptive histogram equalization, and histogram of oriented gradients. The MammoFormer framework addresses critical clinical adoption barriers of AI mammography systems through: (1) systematic optimization of transformer architectures via architecture-specific feature enhancement, achieving up to 13% performance improvement, (2) comprehensive explainable AI integration providing multi-perspective diagnostic interpretability, and (3) a clinically deployable ensemble system combining CNN reliability with transformer global context modeling. The combination of transformer models with suitable feature enhancements enables them to achieve equal or better results than CNN approaches. ViT achieves 98.3% accuracy alongside AHE while Swin Transformer gains a 13.0% advantage through HOG enhancements

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been growing in the field of medical imaging and clinical practice. It is essential to comprehend the perceptions, experiences, and expectations regarding AI implementation among medical radiation technologists (MRTs) working in radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiotherapy. Some global studies tend to inform about AI implementation, but there is almost no information from Central and South American professionals. This study aimed to understand the perceptions of the impact of AI on the MRTs, as well as the varying experiences and expectations these professionals have regarding its implementation. An online survey was conducted among Central and South American MRTs for the collection of qualitative data concerning the primary perceptions regarding the implementation of AI in radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiotherapy. The analysis considered descriptive statistics in closed-ended questions and dimension codification for open-ended responses. A total of 398 valid responses were obtained, and it was determined that 98.5 % (n = 392) of the respondents agreed with the implementation of AI in clinical practice. The primary contributions of AI that were identified were the optimization of processes, greater diagnostic accuracy, and the possibility of job expansion. On the other hand, concerns were raised regarding the delay in providing training opportunities and limited avenues for learning in this domain, the displacement of roles, and dehumanization in clinical practice. This sample of participants likely represents mostly professionals who have more AI knowledge than others. It is therefore important to interpret these results with caution. Our findings indicate strong professional confidence in AI's capacity to improve imaging quality while maintaining patient safety standards. However, user resistance may disturb implementation efforts. Our results highlight the dual need for (a) comprehensive professional training programs and (b) user education initiatives that demonstrate AI's clinical value in radiology. We therefore recommend a carefully structured, phased AI implementation approach, guided by evidence-based guidelines and validated training protocols from existing research. AI is already present in medical imaging, but its effective implementations depend on building acceptance and trust through education and training, enabling MRTs to use it safely for patient benefit.

The success of deep learning and computer vision of natural images has led to an increased interest in medical image deep learning applications. However, introducing black-box deep learning models leaves little room for domain-specific knowledge when making the final diagnosis. For medical computer vision applications, not only accuracy, but also robustness, interpretability and explainability are essential to ensure trust for clinicians. Medical deep learning applications can therefore benefit from insights into the application at hand by involving clinical staff and considering the clinical diagnostic process. In this review, different clinically-inspired methods are surveyed, including clinical insights used at different stages of deep learning design for three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) image data. This review is conducted by investigating 400 research articles, covering different deep learning-based approaches for diagnosis of different diseases, in terms of including clinical insights in the published work. Based on this, a further detailed review is conducted of the 47 scientific articles using clinical inspiration. The clinically-inspired methods were found to be made with respect to preparation for training, 3D medical image data processing, integration of clinical data and model architecture selection and development. This highlights different ways in which domain-specific knowledge can be used in the design of deep learning systems.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly being implemented into clinical practice to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce provider burnout. However, patient self-perceived knowledge and perceptions of AI's role in their care remain unclear. This study aims to explore patient preferences regarding the use of and communication of AI in their care for patients undergoing cross-sectional imaging exams. This single-center cross-sectional study, a structured questionnaire recruited patients undergoing outpatient CT or MRI examinations between June and July 2024 to assess baseline self-perceived knowledge of AI, perspectives on AI in clinical care, preferences regarding AI-generated results, and economic considerations related to AI, using Likert scales and categorical questions. A total of 226 participants (143 females; mean age 53 years) were surveyed with 67.4% (151/224) reporting having minimal to no knowledge of AI in medicine, with lower knowledge levels associated with lower socioeconomic status (p < .001). 90.3% (204/226) believed they should be informed about the use of AI in their care, and 91.1% (204/224) supported the right to opt out. Additionally, 91.1% (204/224) of participants expressed a strong preference for being informed when AI was involved in interpreting their medical images. 65.6% (143/218) indicated that they would not accept a screening imaging exam exclusively interpreted by an AI algorithm. Finally, 91.1% (204/224) of participants wanted disclosure when AI was used and 89.1% (196/220) felt such disclosure and clarification of discrepancies should be considered standard care. To align AI adoption with patient preferences and expectations, radiology practices must prioritize disclosure, patient engagement, and standardized documentation of AI use without being overly burdensome to the diagnostic workflow. Patients prefer transparency for AI utilization in their care, and our study highlights the discrepancy between patient preferences and current clinical practice. Patients are not expected to determine the technical aspects of an image examination such as acquisition parameters or reconstruction kernel and must trust their providers to act in their best interest. Clear communication of how AI is being used in their care should be provided in ways that do not overly burden the radiologist.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, and it is important to diagnose the disease at an early stage to help people with the condition and their families. Recently, artificial intelligence, especially deep learning approaches applied to medical imaging, has shown potential in enhancing AD diagnosis. This comprehensive review investigates the current state of the art in multimodal deep learning for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using image processing. The research underpinning this review spanned several months. Numerous deep learning architectures are examined, including CNNs, transfer learning methods, and combined models that use different imaging modalities, such as structural MRI, functional MRI, and amyloid PET. The latest work on explainable AI (XAI) is also reviewed to improve the understandability of the models and identify the particular regions of the brain related to AD pathology. The results indicate that multimodal approaches generally outperform single-modality methods, and three-dimensional (volumetric) data provides a better form of representation compared to two-dimensional images. Current challenges are also discussed, including insufficient and/or poorly prepared datasets, computational expense, and the lack of integration with clinical practice. The findings highlight the potential of applying deep learning approaches for early AD diagnosis and for directing future research pathways. The integration of multimodal imaging with deep learning techniques presents an exciting direction for developing improved AD diagnostic tools. However, significant challenges remain in achieving accurate, reliable, and understandable clinical applications.

Foundation models are large models trained on big data which can be used for downstream tasks. In radiology, these models can potentially address several gaps in fairness and generalization, as they can be trained on massive datasets without labelled data and adapted to tasks requiring data with a small number of descriptions. This reduces one of the limiting bottlenecks in clinical model construction-data annotation-as these models can be trained through a variety of techniques that require little more than radiological images with or without their corresponding radiological reports. However, foundation models may be insufficient as they are affected-to a smaller extent when compared with traditional supervised learning approaches-by the same issues that lead to underperforming models, such as a lack of transparency/explainability, and biases. To address these issues, we advocate that the development of foundation models should not only be pursued but also accompanied by the development of a decentralized clinical validation and continuous training framework. This does not guarantee the resolution of the problems associated with foundation models, but it enables developers, clinicians and patients to know when, how and why models should be updated, creating a clinical AI ecosystem that is better capable of serving all stakeholders. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Foundation models may mitigate issues like bias and poor generalization in radiology AI, but challenges persist. We propose a decentralized, cross-institutional framework for continuous validation and training to enhance model reliability, safety, and clinical utility. KEY POINTS: Foundation models trained on large datasets reduce annotation burdens and improve fairness and generalization in radiology. Despite improvements, they still face challenges like limited transparency, explainability, and residual biases. A decentralized, cross-institutional framework for clinical validation and continuous training can strengthen reliability and inclusivity in clinical AI.

BackgroundLarge Language Models (LLMs) represent an ever-emerging and rapidly evolving generative artificial intelligence (AI) modality with promising developments in the field of medical education. LLMs can provide automated feedback services to medical trainees (i.e. medical students, residents, fellows, etc.) and possibly serve a role in medical imaging education. AimThis systematic review aims to comprehensively explore the current applications and educational outcomes of LLMs in providing automated feedback on medical imaging reports. MethodsThis study employs a comprehensive systematic review strategy, involving an extensive search of the literature (Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane), data extraction, and synthesis of the data. ConclusionThis systematic review will highlight the best practices of LLM use in automated feedback of medical imaging reports and guide further development of these models.

Integration of AI and XR in TAVR is revolutionizing the management of severe aortic stenosis by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, risk stratification, and pre-procedural planning. Advanced algorithms now facilitate precise electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and CT-based assessments that reduce observer variability and enable patient-specific risk prediction. Immersive XR technologies, including augmented, virtual, and mixed reality, improve spatial visualization of complex cardiac anatomy and support real-time procedural guidance. Despite these advancements, standardized protocols, regulatory frameworks, and ethical safeguards remain necessary for widespread clinical adoption.