Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, necessitating accurate and early diagnosis to guide therapy, along with assessment of treatment response. Response assessment criteria have evolved from traditional morphologic approaches, such as WHO criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), to more recent methods focused on evaluating viable tumor burden, including European Association for Study of Liver (EASL) criteria, modified RECIST (mRECIST) and Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response (LI-TR) algorithm. This shift reflects the complex and evolving landscape of HCC treatment in the context of emerging systemic and locoregional therapies. Each of these criteria have their own nuanced strengths and limitations in capturing the detailed characteristics of HCC treatment and response assessment. The emergence of functional imaging techniques, including dual-energy CT, perfusion imaging, and rising use of radiomics, are enhancing the capabilities of response assessment. Growth in the realm of artificial intelligence and machine learning models provides an opportunity to refine the precision of response assessment by facilitating analysis of complex imaging data patterns. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of existing criteria, discusses functional and emerging imaging techniques, and outlines future directions for advancing HCC tumor response assessment.

Foundation models are large models trained on big data which can be used for downstream tasks. In radiology, these models can potentially address several gaps in fairness and generalization, as they can be trained on massive datasets without labelled data and adapted to tasks requiring data with a small number of descriptions. This reduces one of the limiting bottlenecks in clinical model construction-data annotation-as these models can be trained through a variety of techniques that require little more than radiological images with or without their corresponding radiological reports. However, foundation models may be insufficient as they are affected-to a smaller extent when compared with traditional supervised learning approaches-by the same issues that lead to underperforming models, such as a lack of transparency/explainability, and biases. To address these issues, we advocate that the development of foundation models should not only be pursued but also accompanied by the development of a decentralized clinical validation and continuous training framework. This does not guarantee the resolution of the problems associated with foundation models, but it enables developers, clinicians and patients to know when, how and why models should be updated, creating a clinical AI ecosystem that is better capable of serving all stakeholders. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Foundation models may mitigate issues like bias and poor generalization in radiology AI, but challenges persist. We propose a decentralized, cross-institutional framework for continuous validation and training to enhance model reliability, safety, and clinical utility. KEY POINTS: Foundation models trained on large datasets reduce annotation burdens and improve fairness and generalization in radiology. Despite improvements, they still face challenges like limited transparency, explainability, and residual biases. A decentralized, cross-institutional framework for clinical validation and continuous training can strengthen reliability and inclusivity in clinical AI.

BackgroundLarge Language Models (LLMs) represent an ever-emerging and rapidly evolving generative artificial intelligence (AI) modality with promising developments in the field of medical education. LLMs can provide automated feedback services to medical trainees (i.e. medical students, residents, fellows, etc.) and possibly serve a role in medical imaging education. AimThis systematic review aims to comprehensively explore the current applications and educational outcomes of LLMs in providing automated feedback on medical imaging reports. MethodsThis study employs a comprehensive systematic review strategy, involving an extensive search of the literature (Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane), data extraction, and synthesis of the data. ConclusionThis systematic review will highlight the best practices of LLM use in automated feedback of medical imaging reports and guide further development of these models.

Brugada Syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac ion channelopathy associated with an elevated risk of sudden cardiac death, particularly due to ventricular arrhythmias in structurally normal hearts. Affecting approximately 1 in 2,000 individuals, BrS is most prevalent among middle-aged males of Asian descent. Although diagnosis is based on the presence of a Type 1 electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern, either spontaneous or induced, accurately stratifying risk in asymptomatic and borderline patients remains a major clinical challenge. This review explores current and emerging approaches to BrS risk stratification, focusing on electrocardiographic, electrophysiological, imaging, and computational markers. Non-invasive ECG indicators such as the β-angle, fragmented QRS, S wave in lead I, early repolarisation, aVR sign, and transmural dispersion of repolarisation have demonstrated predictive value for arrhythmic events. Adjunctive tools like signal-averaged ECG, Holter monitoring, and exercise stress testing enhance diagnostic yield by capturing dynamic electrophysiological changes. In parallel, imaging modalities, particularly speckle-tracking echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance have revealed subclinical structural abnormalities in the right ventricular outflow tract and atria, challenging the paradigm of BrS as a purely electrical disorder. Invasive electrophysiological studies and substrate mapping have further clarified the anatomical basis of arrhythmogenesis, while risk scoring systems (e.g., Sieira, BRUGADA-RISK, PAT) and machine learning models offer new avenues for personalised risk assessment. Together, these advances underscore the importance of an integrated, multimodal approach to BrS risk stratification. Optimising these strategies is essential to guide implantable cardioverter-defibrillator decisions and improve outcomes in patients vulnerable to life-threatening arrhythmias.

Skin lesion segmentation is a highly sought-after research topic in medical image processing, which may help in the early diagnosis of skin diseases. Early detection of skin diseases like Melanoma can decrease the mortality rate by 95%. Distinguishing lesions from healthy skin through skin image segmentation is a critical step. Various factors such as color, size, shape of the skin lesion, presence of hair, and other noise pose challenges in segmenting a lesion from healthy skin. Hence, the effectiveness of the segmentation technique utilized is vital for precise disease diagnosis and treatment planning. This review explores and summarizes the latest advancements in skin lesion segmentation techniques and their state-of-the-art methods from 2018 to 2025. It also covers crucial information, including input datasets, pre-processing, augmentation, method configuration, loss functions, hyperparameter settings, and performance metrics. The review addresses the primary challenges encountered in skin lesion segmentation from images and comprehensively compares state-of-the-art techniques for skin lesion segmentation. Researchers in this field will find this review compelling due to the insights on skin lesion segmentation and methodological details, as well as the encouraging results analysis of the state-of-the-art methods.

Point clouds have become an increasingly important representation for 3D medical imaging, offering a compact, surface-preserving alternative to traditional voxel or mesh-based approaches. Recent advances in deep learning have enabled rapid progress in extracting, modeling, and analyzing anatomical shapes directly from point cloud data. This paper provides a comprehensive and systematic survey of learning-based shape analysis for medical point clouds, focusing on three fundamental tasks: registration, reconstruction, and variation modeling. We review recent literature from 2021 to 2025, summarize representative methods, datasets, and evaluation metrics, and highlight clinical applications and unique challenges in the medical domain. Key trends include the integration of hybrid representations, large-scale self-supervised models, and generative techniques. We also discuss current limitations, such as data scarcity, inter-patient variability, and the need for interpretable and robust solutions for clinical deployment. Finally, future directions are outlined for advancing point cloud-based shape learning in medical imaging.

Accurate detection and assessment of inflammatory activity is crucial not only for diagnosing patients with rheumatoid arthritis but also for effective monitoring of treatment effect. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have both been shown to be truthful, reproducible, and sensitive to change for inflammation in joints and tendon sheaths and have validated scoring systems, which altogether allow them to be used as outcome measurement instruments in clinical trials. Furthermore, MRI also allows sensitive and discriminative assessment of structural damage progression in RA, also with validated outcome measures. Other relevant imaging techniques, including the use of artificial intelligence, pose interesting possibilities for future clinical trials and will be briefly addressed in this review article.

Prostate cancer (PCa) represents one of the most prevalent cancers among men, with substantial challenges in timely and accurate diagnosis and subsequent treatment. Traditional diagnosis and treatment methods for PCa, such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) biomarker detection, digital rectal examination, imaging (CT/MRI) analysis, and biopsy histopathological examination, suffer from limitations such as a lack of specificity, generation of false positives or negatives, and difficulty in handling large data, leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in PCa diagnosis and treatment is revolutionizing traditional approaches by offering advanced tools for early detection, personalized treatment planning, and patient management. AI technologies, especially machine learning and deep learning, improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning. The AI algorithms analyze imaging data, like MRI and ultrasound, to identify cancerous lesions effectively with great precision. In addition, AI algorithms enhance risk assessment and prognosis by combining clinical, genomic, and imaging data. This leads to more tailored treatment strategies, enabling informed decisions about active surveillance, surgery, or new therapies, thereby improving quality of life while reducing unnecessary diagnoses and treatments. This review examines current AI applications in PCa care, focusing on their transformative impact on diagnosis and treatment planning while recognizing potential challenges. It also outlines expected improvements in diagnosis through AI-integrated systems and decision support tools for healthcare teams. The findings highlight AI's potential to enhance clinical outcomes, operational efficiency, and patient-centred care in managing PCa.

A digital twin is a computational model that provides a virtual representation of a specific physical object, system, or process and predicts its behavior at future time points. These simulation models form computational profiles for new diagnosis and prevention models. The digital twin is a concept borrowed from engineering. However, the rapid evolution of this technology has extended its application across various industries. In recent years, digital twins in healthcare have gained significant traction due to their potential to revolutionize medicine and drug development. In the context of radiology, digital twin technology can be applied in various areas, including optimizing medical device design, improving system performance, facilitating personalized medicine, conducting virtual clinical trials, and educating radiology trainees. Also, radiologic image data is a critical source of patient-specific measures that play a role in generating advanced intelligent digital twins. Generating a practical digital twin faces several challenges, including data availability, computational techniques, validation frameworks, and uncertainty quantification, all of which require collaboration among engineers, healthcare providers, and stakeholders. This review focuses on recent trends in digital twin technology and its intersection with radiology by reviewing applications, technological advancements, and challenges that need to be addressed for successful implementation in the field.

This Perspective article explores the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting perioperative hypoxemia through the integration of deep learning (DL) with multimodal clinical data, including lung imaging, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis. Perioperative hypoxemia, defined as arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO₂) <60 mmHg or oxygen saturation (SpO₂) <90%, poses significant risks of delayed recovery and organ dysfunction. Traditional diagnostic methods, such as radiological imaging and ABG analysis, often lack integrated predictive accuracy. AI frameworks, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and hybrid models like TD-CNNLSTM-LungNet, demonstrate exceptional performance in detecting pulmonary inflammation and stratifying hypoxemia risk, achieving up to 96.57% accuracy in pneumonia subtype differentiation and an AUC of 0.96 for postoperative hypoxemia prediction. Multimodal AI systems, such as DeepLung-Predict, unify CT scans, PFTs, and ABG parameters to enhance predictive precision, surpassing conventional methods by 22%. However, challenges persist, including dataset heterogeneity, model interpretability, and clinical workflow integration. Future directions emphasize multicenter validation, explainable AI (XAI) frameworks, and pragmatic trials to ensure equitable and reliable deployment. This AI-driven approach not only optimizes resource allocation but also mitigates financial burdens on healthcare systems by enabling early interventions and reducing ICU admission risks.