As the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into radiology workflows continues to evolve, establishing standardized processes for the evaluation and deployment of AI models is crucial to ensure success. This paper outlines the creation of a Radiology AI Council at a large academic center and subsequent development of framework in the form of a rubric to formalize the evaluation of radiology AI models and onboard them into clinical workflows. The rubric aims to address the challenges faced during the deployment of AI models, such as real-world model performance, workflow implementation, resource allocation, return on investment (ROI), and impact to the broader health system. Using this comprehensive rubric, the council aims to ensure that the process for selecting AI models is both standardized and transparent. This paper outlines the steps taken to establish this rubric, its components, and initial results from evaluation of 13 models over an 8-month period. We emphasize the importance of holistic model evaluation beyond performance metrics, and transparency and objectivity in AI model evaluation with the goal of improving the efficacy and safety of AI models in radiology.

High-quality segmentation is important for AI-driven radiological research and clinical practice, with the potential to play an even more prominent role in the future. As medical imaging advances, accurately segmenting anatomical and pathological structures is increasingly used to obtain quantitative data and valuable insights. Segmentation and volumetric analysis could enable more precise diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient monitoring. These guidelines aim to improve segmentation accuracy and consistency, allowing for better decision-making in both research and clinical environments. Practical advice on planning and organization is provided, focusing on quality, precision, and communication among clinical teams. Additionally, tips and strategies for improving segmentation practices in radiology and radiation oncology are discussed, as are potential pitfalls to avoid. KEY POINTS: As AI continues to advance, volumetry will become more integrated into clinical practice, making it essential for radiologists to stay informed about its applications in diagnosis and treatment planning. There is a significant lack of practical guidelines and resources tailored specifically for radiologists on technical topics like segmentation and volumetric analysis. Establishing clear rules and best practices for segmentation can streamline volumetric assessment in clinical settings, making it easier to manage and leading to more accurate decision-making for patient care.

To perform a systematic review on the impact of deep learning (DL)-based triage for reducing diagnostic delays and improving patient outcomes in peer-reviewed and pre-print publications. A search was conducted of primary research studies focused on DL-based worklist optimization for diagnostic imaging triage published on multiple databases from January 2018 until July 2024. Extracted data included study design, dataset characteristics, workflow metrics including report turnaround time and time-to-treatment, and patient outcome differences. Further analysis between clinical settings and integration modality was investigated using nonparametric statistics. Risk of bias was assessed with the risk of bias in non-randomized studies-of interventions (ROBINS-I) checklist. A total of 38 studies from 20 publications, involving 138,423 images, were analyzed. Workflow interventions concerned pulmonary embolism (n = 8), stroke (n = 3), intracranial hemorrhage (n = 12), and chest conditions (n = 15). Patients in the post DL-triage group had shorter median report turnaround times: a mean difference of 12.3 min (IQR: -25.7, -7.6) for pulmonary embolism, 20.5 min (IQR: -32.1, -9.3) for stroke, 4.3 min (IQR: -8.6, 1.3) for intracranial hemorrhage and 29.7 min (IQR: -2947.7, -18.3) for chest diseases. Sub-group analysis revealed that reductions varied per clinical environment and relative prevalence rates but were the highest when algorithms actively stratified and reordered the radiological worklist, with reductions of -43.7% in report turnaround time compared to -7.6% from widget-based systems (p < 0.01). DL-based triage systems had comparable report turnaround time improvements, especially in outpatient and high-prevalence settings, suggesting that AI-based triage holds promise in alleviating radiology workloads. Question Can DL-based triage address lengthening imaging report turnaround times and improve patient outcomes across distinct clinical environments? Findings DL-based triage improved report turnaround time across disease groups, with higher reductions reported in high-prevalence or lower acuity settings. Clinical relevance DL-based workflow prioritization is a reliable tool for reducing diagnostic imaging delay for time-sensitive disease across clinical settings. However, further research and reliable metrics are needed to provide specific recommendations with regards to false-negative examinations and multi-condition prioritization.

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) is a widely used standard for storing and exchanging health care data. At the same time, image-based artificial intelligence (AI) models for quantifying relevant body structures and organs from routine computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging scans have emerged. The missing link, simultaneously a needed step in advancing personalized medicine, is the incorporation of measurements delivered by AI models into an interoperable and standardized format. Incorporating image-based measurements and biomarkers into FHIR profiles can standardize data exchange, enabling timely, personalized treatment decisions and improving the precision and efficiency of patient care. This study aims to present the synergistic incorporation of CT-derived body organ and composition measurements with FHIR, delineating an initial paradigm for storing image-based biomarkers. This study integrated the results of the Body and Organ Analysis (BOA) model into FHIR profiles to enhance the interoperability of image-based biomarkers in radiology. The BOA model was selected as an exemplary AI model due to its ability to provide detailed body composition and organ measurements from CT scans. The FHIR profiles were developed based on 2 primary observation types: Body Composition Analysis (BCA Observation) for quantitative body composition metrics and Body Structure Observation for organ measurements. These profiles were structured to interoperate with a specially designed Diagnostic Report profile, which references the associated Imaging Study, ensuring a standardized linkage between image data and derived biomarkers. To ensure interoperability, all labels were mapped to SNOMED CT (Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms) or RadLex terminologies using specific value sets. The profiles were developed using FHIR Shorthand (FSH) and SUSHI, enabling efficient definition and implementation guide generation, ensuring consistency and maintainability. In this study, 4 BOA profiles, namely, Body Composition Analysis Observation, Body Structure Volume Observation, Diagnostic Report, and Imaging Study, have been presented. These FHIR profiles, which cover 104 anatomical landmarks, 8 body regions, and 8 tissues, enable the interoperable usage of the results of AI segmentation models, providing a direct link between image studies, series, and measurements. The BOA profiles provide a foundational framework for integrating AI-derived imaging biomarkers into FHIR, bridging the gap between advanced imaging analytics and standardized health care data exchange. By enabling structured, interoperable representation of body composition and organ measurements, these profiles facilitate seamless integration into clinical and research workflows, supporting improved data accessibility and interoperability. Their adaptability allows for extension to other imaging modalities and AI models, fostering a more standardized and scalable approach to using imaging biomarkers in precision medicine. This work represents a step toward enhancing the integration of AI-driven insights into digital health ecosystems, ultimately contributing to more data-driven, personalized, and efficient patient care.

Neuroimaging screening and surveillance is one of the first frontline diagnostic tools leveraged in the acute assessment (first 24 h postinjury) of patients suspected to have traumatic brain injury (TBI). While imaging, in particular computed tomography, is used almost universally in emergency departments worldwide to evaluate possible features of TBI, there is no currently agreed-upon reporting system, standard terminology, or framework to contextualize brain imaging findings with other available medical, psychosocial, and environmental data. In 2023, the NIH-National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke convened six working groups of international experts in TBI to develop a new framework for nomenclature and classification. The goal of this effort was to propose a more granular system of injury classification that incorporates recent progress in imaging biomarkers, blood-based biomarkers, and injury and recovery modifiers to replace the commonly used Glasgow Coma Scale-based diagnosis groups of mild, moderate, and severe TBI, which have shown relatively poor diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic utility. Motivated by prior efforts to standardize the nomenclature for pathoanatomic imaging findings of TBI for research and clinical trials, along with more recent studies supporting the refinement of the originally proposed definitions, the Imaging Working Group sought to update and expand this application specifically for consideration of use in clinical practice. Here we report the recommendations of this working group to enable the translation of structured imaging common data elements to the standard of care. These leverage recent advances in imaging technology, electronic medical record (EMR) systems, and artificial intelligence (AI), along with input from key stakeholders, including patients with lived experience, caretakers, providers across medical disciplines, radiology industry partners, and policymakers. It was recommended that (1) there would be updates to the definitions of key imaging features used for this system of classification and that these should be further refined as new evidence of the underlying pathology driving the signal change is identified; (2) there would be an efficient, integrated tool embedded in the EMR imaging reporting system developed in collaboration with industry partners; (3) this would include AI-generated evidence-based feature clusters with diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications; and (4) a "patient translator" would be developed in parallel to assist patients and families in understanding these imaging features. In addition, important disclaimers would be provided regarding known limitations of current technology until such time as they are overcome, such as resolution and sequence parameter considerations. The end goal is a multifaceted TBI characterization model incorporating clinical, imaging, blood biomarker, and psychosocial and environmental modifiers to better serve patients not only acutely but also through the postinjury continuum in the days, months, and years that follow TBI.

This study explores the use of Federated Learning (FL) for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis using chest X-rays in low-resource settings across Africa. FL allows hospitals to collaboratively train AI models without sharing raw patient data, addressing privacy concerns and data scarcity that hinder traditional centralized models. The research involved hospitals and research centers in eight African countries. Most sites used local datasets, while Ghana and The Gambia used public ones. The study compared locally trained models with a federated model built across all institutions to evaluate FL's real-world feasibility. Despite its promise, implementing FL in sub-Saharan Africa faces challenges such as poor infrastructure, unreliable internet, limited digital literacy, and weak AI regulations. Some institutions were also reluctant to share model updates due to data control concerns. In conclusion, FL shows strong potential for enabling AI-driven healthcare in underserved regions, but broader adoption will require improvements in infrastructure, education, and regulatory support.

Multi-modal medical image fusion (MMIF) is increasingly recognized as an essential technique for enhancing diagnostic precision and facilitating effective clinical decision-making within computer-aided diagnosis systems. MMIF combines data from X-ray, MRI, CT, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound to create detailed, clinically useful images of patient anatomy and pathology. These integrated representations significantly advance diagnostic accuracy, lesion detection, and segmentation. This comprehensive review meticulously surveys the evolution, methodologies, algorithms, current advancements, and clinical applications of MMIF. We present a critical comparative analysis of traditional fusion approaches, including pixel-, feature-, and decision-level methods, and delves into recent advancements driven by deep learning, generative models, and transformer-based architectures. A critical comparative analysis is presented between these conventional methods and contemporary techniques, highlighting differences in robustness, computational efficiency, and interpretability. The article addresses extensive clinical applications across oncology, neurology, and cardiology, demonstrating MMIF's vital role in precision medicine through improved patient-specific therapeutic outcomes. Moreover, the review thoroughly investigates the persistent challenges affecting MMIF's broad adoption, including issues related to data privacy, heterogeneity, computational complexity, interpretability of AI-driven algorithms, and integration within clinical workflows. It also identifies significant future research avenues, such as the integration of explainable AI, adoption of privacy-preserving federated learning frameworks, development of real-time fusion systems, and standardization efforts for regulatory compliance.

CBCT has become an essential tool in orthodontics, although its use must remain judicious and evidence-based. This study provides an updated analysis of international recommendations concerning the use of CBCT in orthodontics, with a particular focus on clinical indications, radiation dose reduction, and recent technological advancements. A systematic review of guidelines published between 2015 and 2025 was conducted following the PRISMA methodology. Inclusion criteria comprised official directives from recognized scientific societies and clinical studies evaluating low dose protocols in orthodontics. The analysis of the 19 retained recommendations reveals a consensus regarding the primary indications for CBCT in orthodontics, particularly for impacted teeth, skeletal anomalies, periodontal and upper airways assessment. Dose optimization and the integration of artificial intelligence emerge as major advancements, enabling significant radiation reduction while preserving diagnostic accuracy. The development of low dose protocols and advanced reconstruction algorithms presents promising perspectives for safer and more efficient imaging, increasingly replacing conventional 2D radiographic techniques. However, an international harmonization of recommendations for these new imaging sequences is imperative to standardize clinical practices and enhance patient radioprotection.

Information overload in electronic health records requires effective solutions to alleviate clinicians' administrative tasks. Automatically summarizing clinical text has gained significant attention with the rise of large language models. While individual studies show optimism, a structured overview of the research landscape is lacking. This study aims to present the current state of the art on clinical text summarization using large language models, evaluate the level of evidence in existing research and assess the applicability of performance findings in clinical settings. This scoping review complied with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Literature published between January 1, 2019, and June 18, 2024, was identified from 5 databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library. Studies were excluded if they did not describe transformer-based models, did not focus on clinical text summarization, did not engage with free-text data, were not original research, were nonretrievable, were not peer-reviewed, or were not in English, French, Spanish, or German. Data related to study context and characteristics, scope of research, and evaluation methodologies were systematically collected and analyzed by 3 authors independently. A total of 30 original studies were included in the analysis. All used observational retrospective designs, mainly using real patient data (n=28, 93%). The research landscape demonstrated a narrow research focus, often centered on summarizing radiology reports (n=17, 57%), primarily involving data from the intensive care unit (n=15, 50%) of US-based institutions (n=19, 73%), in English (n=26, 87%). This focus aligned with the frequent reliance on the open-source Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care dataset (n=15, 50%). Summarization methodologies predominantly involved abstractive approaches (n=17, 57%) on single-document inputs (n=4, 13%) with unstructured data (n=13, 43%), yet reporting on methodological details remained inconsistent across studies. Model selection involved both open-source models (n=26, 87%) and proprietary models (n=7, 23%). Evaluation frameworks were highly heterogeneous. All studies conducted internal validation, but external validation (n=2, 7%), failure analysis (n=6, 20%), and patient safety risks analysis (n=1, 3%) were infrequent, and none reported bias assessment. Most studies used both automated metrics and human evaluation (n=16, 53%), while 10 (33%) used only automated metrics, and 4 (13%) only human evaluation. Key barriers hinder the translation of current research into trustworthy, clinically valid applications. Current research remains exploratory and limited in scope, with many applications yet to be explored. Performance assessments often lack reliability, and clinical impact evaluations are insufficient raising concerns about model utility, safety, fairness, and data privacy. Advancing the field requires more robust evaluation frameworks, a broader research scope, and a stronger focus on real-world applicability.

Artificial intelligence (AI) studies show promise in enhancing accuracy and efficiency in mammographic screening programs worldwide. However, its integration into clinical workflows faces several challenges, including unintended errors, the need for professional training, and ethical concerns. Notably, specific frameworks for AI imaging in breast cancer screening are still lacking. This study aims to identify the challenges associated with implementing AI in breast screening programs and to apply the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to discuss a practical governance framework for AI in this context. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE) were searched using combinations of the keywords "artificial intelligence," "regulation," "governance," "breast cancer," and "screening." Original studies evaluating AI in breast cancer detection or discussing challenges related to AI implementation in this setting were eligible for review. Findings were narratively synthesized and subsequently mapped directly onto the constructs within the CFIR. A total of 1240 results were retrieved, with 20 original studies ultimately included in this systematic review. The majority (n=19) focused on AI-enhanced mammography, while 1 addressed AI-enhanced ultrasound for women with dense breasts. Most studies originated from the United States (n=5) and the United Kingdom (n=4), with publication years ranging from 2019 to 2023. The quality of papers was rated as moderate to high. The key challenges identified were reproducibility, evidentiary standards, technological concerns, trust issues, as well as ethical, legal, societal concerns, and postadoption uncertainty. By aligning these findings with the CFIR constructs, action plans targeting the main challenges were incorporated into the framework, facilitating a structured approach to addressing these issues. This systematic review identifies key challenges in implementing AI in breast cancer screening, emphasizing the need for consistency, robust evidentiary standards, technological advancements, user trust, ethical frameworks, legal safeguards, and societal benefits. These findings can serve as a blueprint for policy makers, clinicians, and AI developers to collaboratively advance AI adoption in breast cancer screening. PROSPERO CRD42024553889; https://tinyurl.com/mu4nwcxt.