Lung cancer is a major cause of cancer-related deaths, and early diagnosis and treatment are crucial for improving patients' survival outcomes. In this paper, we propose to employ convolutional neural networks to model the non-linear relationship between the risk of lung cancer and the lungs' morphology revealed in the CT images. We apply a mini-batched loss that extends the Cox proportional hazards model to handle the non-convexity induced by neural networks, which also enables the training of large data sets. Additionally, we propose to combine mini-batched loss and binary cross-entropy to predict both lung cancer occurrence and the risk of mortality. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of both the mini-batched loss with and without the censoring mechanism, as well as its combination with binary cross-entropy. We evaluate our approach on the National Lung Screening Trial data set with several 3D convolutional neural network architectures, achieving high AUC and C-index scores for lung cancer classification and survival prediction. These results, obtained from simulations and real data experiments, highlight the potential of our approach to improving the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer.

Aiming to evaluate the effects of the smart metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm and combinations of various scanning parameters, including radiation dose levels, tube voltage, and reconstruction algorithms, on metal artifact reduction and overall image quality, to identify the optimal protocol for clinical application. A phantom with a pacemaker was examined using standard dose (effective dose (ED): 3 mSv) and low dose (ED: 0.5 mSv), with three scan voltages (70, 100, and 120 kVp) selected for each dose. Raw data were reconstructed using 50% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V), ASIR-V with MAR, high-strength deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR-H), and DLIR-H with MAR. Quantitative analyses (artifact index (AI), noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of artifact-impaired pulmonary nodules (PNs), and noise power spectrum (NPS) of artifact-free regions) and qualitative evaluation were performed. Quantitatively, the deep learning image recognition (DLIR) algorithm or high tube voltages exhibited lower noise compared to the ASIR-V or low tube voltages (<i>p</i> < 0.001). AI of images with MAR or high tube voltages was significantly lower than that of images without MAR or low tube voltages (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in AI between low-dose images with 120 kVp DLIR-H MAR and standard-dose images with 70 kVp ASIR-V MAR (<i>p</i> = 0.143). Only the 70 kVp 3 mSv protocol demonstrated statistically significant differences in SNR for artifact-impaired PNs (<i>p</i> = 0.041). The f_peak and f_avg values were similar across various scenarios, indicating that the MAR algorithm did not alter the image texture in artifact-free regions. The qualitative results of the extent of metal artifacts, the confidence in diagnosing artifact-impaired PNs, and the overall image quality were generally consistent with the quantitative results. The MAR algorithm combined with DLIR-H can reduce metal artifacts and enhance the overall image quality, particularly at high kVp tube voltages.