Planning an osteotomy or arthroplasty surgery on a lower limb requires prior classification/identification of its deformities. The detection of skeletal landmarks and the calculation of angles required to identify the deformities are traditionally done manually, with measurement accuracy relying considerably on the experience of the individual doing the measurements. We propose a novel, image pyramid-based approach to skeletal landmark detection. The proposed approach uses a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that receives the raw X-ray image as input and produces the coordinates of the landmarks. The landmark estimations are modified iteratively via the error feedback method to come closer to the target. Our clinically produced full-leg X-Rays dataset is made publically available and used to train and test the network. Angular quantities are calculated based on detected landmarks. Angles are then classified as lower than normal, normal or higher than normal according to predefined ranges for a normal condition. The performance of our approach is evaluated at several levels: landmark coordinates accuracy, angles' measurement accuracy, and classification accuracy. The average absolute error (difference between automatically and manually determined coordinates) for landmarks was 0.79 ± 0.57 mm on test data, and the average absolute error (difference between automatically and manually calculated angles) for angles was 0.45 ± 0.42°. Results from multiple case studies involving high-resolution images show that the proposed approach outperforms previous deep learning-based approaches in terms of accuracy and computational cost. It also enables the automatic detection of the lower limb misalignments in full-leg x-ray images.

Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, has demonstrated high diagnostic performance in detecting intracranial aneurysms on computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). However, the clinical translation of these technologies remains limited due to methodological limitations and concerns about generalizability. This scoping review comprehensively evaluates 36 studies that applied deep learning to intracranial aneurysm detection on CTA or MRA, focusing on study design, validation strategies, reporting practices, and reference standards. Key findings include inconsistent handling of ruptured and previously treated aneurysms, underreporting of coexisting brain or vascular abnormalities, limited use of external validation, and an almost complete absence of prospective study designs. Only a minority of studies employed diagnostic cohorts that reflect real-world aneurysm prevalence, and few reported all essential performance metrics, such as patient-wise and lesion-wise sensitivity, specificity, and false positives per case. These limitations suggest that current studies remain at the stage of technical validation, with high risks of bias and limited clinical applicability. To facilitate real-world implementation, future research must adopt more rigorous designs, representative and diverse validation cohorts, standardized reporting practices, and greater attention to human-AI interaction.

The fetal origins of adult disease, widely known as Barker's Hypothesis, suggest that adverse fetal environments significantly impact the risk of developing chronic diseases, such as diabetes and cardiovascular conditions, in adulthood. Recent advancements in 4D ultrasound (4D US) and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies offer a promising avenue for improving prenatal diagnostics and validating this hypothesis. These innovations provide detailed insights into fetal behavior and neurodevelopment, linking early developmental markers to long-term health outcomes. This study synthesizes contemporary developments in AI-enhanced 4D US, focusing on their roles in detecting fetal anomalies, assessing neurodevelopmental markers, and evaluating congenital heart defects. The integration of AI with 4D US allows for real-time, high-resolution visualization of fetal anatomy and behavior, surpassing the diagnostic precision of traditional methods. Despite these advancements, challenges such as algorithmic bias, data diversity, and real-world validation persist and require further exploration. Findings demonstrate that AI-driven 4D US improves diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy, enabling earlier detection of fetal abnormalities and optimization of clinical workflows. By providing a more comprehensive understanding of fetal programming, these technologies substantiate the links between early-life conditions and adult health outcomes, as proposed by Barker's Hypothesis. The integration of AI and 4D US has the potential to revolutionize prenatal care, paving the way for personalized maternal-fetal healthcare. Future research should focus on addressing current limitations, including ethical concerns and accessibility challenges, to promote equitable implementation. Such advancements could significantly reduce the global burden of chronic diseases and foster healthier generations.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) stands as one of the preeminent hip disorders prevalent in pediatric orthopedics. Automated diagnostic instruments, driven by artificial intelligence methodologies, are capable of providing substantial assistance to clinicians in the diagnosis of DDH. We have developed a dataset designated as Multitasking DDH (MTDDH), which is composed of two sub-datasets. Dataset 1 encompasses 1,250 pelvic X-ray images, with annotations demarcating four discrete regions for the evaluation of pelvic X-ray quality, in tandem with eight pivotal points serving as support for DDH diagnosis. Dataset 2 contains 906 pelvic X-ray images, and each image has been annotated with eight key points for assisting in the diagnosis of DDH. Notably, MTDDH represents the pioneering dataset engineered for the comprehensive evaluation of pelvic X-ray quality while concurrently offering the most exhaustive set of eight key points to bolster DDH diagnosis, thus fulfilling the exigency for enhanced diagnostic precision. Ultimately, we presented the elaborate process of constructing the MTDDH and furnished a concise introduction regarding its application.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing orthopedic research and clinical practice by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, optimizing treatment strategies, and streamlining clinical workflows. Recent advances in deep learning have enabled the development of algorithms that detect fractures, grade osteoarthritis, and identify subtle pathologies in radiographic and magnetic resonance images with performance comparable to expert clinicians. These AI-driven systems reduce missed diagnoses and provide objective, reproducible assessments that facilitate early intervention and personalized treatment planning. Moreover, AI has made significant strides in predictive analytics by integrating diverse patient data-including gait and imaging features-to forecast surgical outcomes, implant survivorship, and rehabilitation trajectories. Emerging applications in robotics, augmented reality, digital twin technologies, and exoskeleton control promise to further transform preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance. Despite these promising developments, challenges such as data heterogeneity, algorithmic bias, and the "black box" nature of many models-as well as issues with robust validation-remain. This comprehensive review synthesizes current developments, critically examines limitations, and outlines future directions for integrating AI into musculoskeletal care.

Deep learning (DL) identification of vertebral fractures and osteoporosis in lateral spine radiographs and DXA vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) images may improve fracture risk assessment in older adults. In 26 299 lateral spine radiographs from 9276 individuals attending a tertiary-level institution (60% train set; 20% validation set; 20% test set; VERTE-X cohort), DL models were developed to detect prevalent vertebral fracture (pVF) and osteoporosis. The pre-trained DL models from lateral spine radiographs were then fine-tuned in 30% of a DXA VFA dataset (KURE cohort), with performance evaluated in the remaining 70% test set. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) for DL models to detect pVF and osteoporosis was 0.926 (95% CI 0.908-0.955) and 0.848 (95% CI 0.827-0.869) from VERTE-X spine radiographs, respectively, and 0.924 (95% CI 0.905-0.942) and 0.867 (95% CI 0.853-0.881) from KURE DXA VFA images, respectively. A total of 13.3% and 13.6% of individuals sustained an incident fracture during a median follow-up of 5.4 years and 6.4 years in the VERTE-X test set (n = 1852) and KURE test set (n = 2456), respectively. Incident fracture risk was significantly greater among individuals with DL-detected vertebral fracture (hazard ratios [HRs] 3.23 [95% CI 2.51-5.17] and 2.11 [95% CI 1.62-2.74] for the VERTE-X and KURE test sets) or DL-detected osteoporosis (HR 2.62 [95% CI 1.90-3.63] and 2.14 [95% CI 1.72-2.66]), which remained significant after adjustment for clinical risk factors and femoral neck bone mineral density. DL scores improved incident fracture discrimination and net benefit when combined with clinical risk factors. In summary, DL-detected pVF and osteoporosis in lateral spine radiographs and DXA VFA images enhanced fracture risk prediction in older adults.

Trauma-induced rib fractures are common injuries. The gold standard for diagnosing rib fractures is computed tomography (CT), but the sensitivity in the acute setting is low, and interpreting CT slices is labor-intensive. This has led to the development of new diagnostic approaches leveraging deep learning (DL) models. This systematic review and pooled analysis aimed to compare the performance of DL models in the detection, segmentation, and classification of rib fractures based on CT scans. A literature search was performed using various databases for studies describing DL models detecting, segmenting, or classifying rib fractures from CT data. Reported performance metrics included sensitivity, false-positive rate, F1-score, precision, accuracy, and mean average precision. A meta-analysis was performed on the sensitivity scores to compare the DL models with clinicians. Of the 323 identified records, 25 were included. Twenty-one studies reported on detection, four on segmentation, and 10 on classification. Twenty studies had adequate data for meta-analysis. The gold standard labels were provided by clinicians who were radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. For detecting rib fractures, DL models had a higher sensitivity (86.7%; 95% CI: 82.6%-90.2%) than clinicians (75.4%; 95% CI: 68.1%-82.1%). In classification, the sensitivity of DL models for displaced rib fractures (97.3%; 95% CI: 95.6%-98.5%) was significantly better than that of clinicians (88.2%; 95% CI: 84.8%-91.3%). DL models for rib fracture detection and classification achieved promising results. With better sensitivities than clinicians for detecting and classifying displaced rib fractures, the future should focus on implementing DL models in daily clinics. Level III-systematic review and pooled analysis.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are capable of recognizing tumor antigens, impacting tumor prognosis, predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapies, contributing to the development of new cell-based immunotherapies, studying the tumor immune microenvironment, and identifying novel biomarkers. Traditional methods for evaluating TILs primarily rely on histopathological examination using standard hematoxylin and eosin staining or immunohistochemical staining, with manual cell counting under a microscope. These methods are time-consuming and subject to significant observer variability and error. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly advanced in the field of medical imaging, particularly with deep learning algorithms based on convolutional neural networks. AI has shown promise as a powerful tool for the quantitative evaluation of tumor biomarkers. The advent of AI offers new opportunities for the automated and standardized assessment of TILs. This review provides an overview of the advancements in the application of AI for assessing TILs from multiple perspectives. It specifically focuses on AI-driven approaches for identifying TILs in tumor tissue images, automating TILs quantification, recognizing TILs subpopulations, and analyzing the spatial distribution patterns of TILs. The review aims to elucidate the prognostic value of TILs in various cancers, as well as their predictive capacity for responses to immunotherapy and neoadjuvant therapy. Furthermore, the review explores the integration of AI with other emerging technologies, such as single-cell sequencing, multiplex immunofluorescence, spatial transcriptomics, and multimodal approaches, to enhance the comprehensive study of TILs and further elucidate their clinical utility in tumor treatment and prognosis.

Substantial gaps exist in the neuroprognostication of cardiac arrest patients who remain comatose after the restoration of spontaneous circulation. Most studies focus on predicting survival, a measure confounded by the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment decisions. Severe cerebral edema (SCE) may serve as an objective proximal imaging-based surrogate of neurologic injury. We retrospectively analyzed data from 288 patients to automate SCE detection with machine learning (ML) and to test the hypothesis that the quantitative values produced by these algorithms (ML_SCE) can improve predictions of neurologic outcomes. Ground-truth SCE (GT_SCE) classification was based on radiology reports. The model attained a cross-validated testing accuracy of 87% [95% CI: 84%, 89%] for detecting SCE. Attention maps explaining SCE classification focused on cisternal regions (p<0.05). Multivariable analyses showed that older age (p<0.001), non-shockable initial cardiac rhythm (p=0.004), and greater ML_SCE values (p<0.001) were significant predictors of poor neurologic outcomes, with GT_SCE (p=0.064) as a non-significant covariate. Our results support the feasibility of automated SCE detection. Future prospective studies with standardized neurologic assessments are needed to substantiate the utility of quantitative ML_SCE values to improve neuroprognostication.

Identification of bony landmarks in medical images is of high importance for 3D planning in orthopaedic surgery. Automated landmark identification has the potential to optimize clinical routines and allows for the scientific analysis of large databases. To the authors' knowledge, no direct comparison of different methods for automated landmark detection on the same dataset has been published to date. We compared 3 methods for automated femoral landmark identification: an artificial neural network, a statistical shape model and a geometric approach. All methods were compared against manual measurements of two raters on the task of identifying 6 femoral landmarks on CT data or derived surface models of 202 femora. The accuracy of the methods was in the range of the manual measurements and comparable to those reported in previous studies. The geometric approach showed a significantly higher average deviation compared to the manually selected reference landmarks, while there was no statistically significant difference for the neural network and the SSM. All fully automated methods show potential for use, depending on the use case. Characteristics of the different methods, such as the input data required (raw CT/segmented bone surface models, amount of training data required) and/or the methods robustness, can be used for method selection in the individual application.