Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising and powerful technology with increasing use in orthopedics. The global morbidity of knee arthroplasty is expanding. This study investigated the use of AI algorithms to review radiographs of knee arthroplasty. The Ovid-Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WeiPu (VIP), WanFang, and China Biology Medicine (CBM) databases were systematically screened from inception to March 2024 (PROSPERO study protocol registration: CRD42024507549). The quality assessment of the diagnostic accuracy studies tool assessed the risk of bias. A total of 21 studies were included in the analysis. Of these, 10 studies identified and classified implant brands, 6 measured implant size and component alignment, 3 detected implant loosening, and 2 diagnosed prosthetic joint infections (PJI). For classifying and identifying implant brands, 5 studies demonstrated near-perfect prediction with an area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.98 to 1.0, and 10 achieved accuracy (ACC) between 96-100%. Regarding implant measurement, one study showed an AUC of 0.62, and two others exhibited over 80% ACC in determining component sizes. Moreover, Artificial intelligence showed good to excellent reliability across all angles in three separate studies (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient > 0.78). In predicting PJI, one study achieved an AUC of 0.91 with a corresponding ACC of 90.5%, while another reported a positive predictive value ranging from 75% to 85%. For detecting implant loosening, the AUC was found to be at least as high as 0.976 with ACC ranging from 85.8% to 97.5%. These studies show that AI is promising in recognizing implants in knee arthroplasty. Future research should follow a rigorous approach to AI development, with comprehensive and transparent reporting of methods and the creation of open-source software programs and commercial tools that can provide clinicians with objective clinical decisions.

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor among women worldwide, and early diagnosis is crucial for reducing mortality rates. Traditional diagnostic methods have significant limitations in terms of accuracy and consistency. Imaging is a common technique for diagnosing and predicting breast cancer, but human error remains a concern. Increasingly, artificial intelligence (AI) is being employed to assist physicians in reducing diagnostic errors. We developed an intelligent diagnostic model combining deep learning and radiomics to enhance breast tumor diagnosis. The model integrates MobileNet with ResNeXt-inspired depthwise separable and grouped convolutions, improving feature processing and efficiency while reducing parameters. Using AI-Dhabyani and TCIA breast ultrasound datasets, we validated the model internally and externally, comparing it to VGG16, ResNet, AlexNet, and MobileNet. Results: The internal validation set achieved an accuracy of 83.84% with an AUC of 0.92, outperforming other models. The external validation set showed an accuracy of 69.44% with an AUC of 0.75, demonstrating high robustness and generalizability. Conclusions: We developed an intelligent diagnostic model using deep learning and radiomics to improve breast tumor diagnosis. The model combines MobileNet with ResNeXt-inspired depthwise separable and grouped convolutions, enhancing feature processing and efficiency while reducing parameters. It was validated internally and externally using the AI-Dhabyani and TCIA breast ultrasound datasets and compared with VGG16, ResNet, AlexNet, and MobileNet.

Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise in clinical tasks, yet its integration into workflows remains underexplored. This study proposes an AI-aided same-day diagnostic imaging workup to reduce recall rates following abnormal screening mammograms and alleviate patient anxiety while waiting for the diagnostic examinations. Using discrete simulation, we found minimal disruption to the workflow (a 4% reduction in daily patient volume or a 2% increase in operating time) under specific conditions: operation from 9 am to 12 pm with all radiologists managing all patient types (screenings, diagnostics, and biopsies). Costs specific to the AI-aided same-day diagnostic workup include AI software expenses and potential losses from unused pre-reserved slots for same-day diagnostic workups. These simulation findings can inform the implementation of an AI-aided same-day diagnostic workup, with future research focusing on its potential benefits, including improved patient satisfaction, reduced anxiety, lower recall rates, and shorter time to cancer diagnoses and treatment.

Machine learning (ML) algorithms play a crucial role in the early and accurate diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (AD), which is essential for effective treatment planning. However, existing methods are not well-suited for identifying Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), a critical transitional stage between normal aging and AD. This inadequacy is primarily due to label imbalance and bias from different sensitve attributes in MCI classification. To overcome these challenges, we have designed an end-to-end fairness-aware approach for label-imbalanced classification, tailored specifically for neuroimaging data. This method, built on the recently developed FACIMS framework, integrates into STREAMLINE, an automated ML environment. We evaluated our approach against nine other ML algorithms and found that it achieves comparable balanced accuracy to other methods while prioritizing fairness in classifications with five different sensitive attributes. This analysis contributes to the development of equitable and reliable ML diagnostics for MCI detection.

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has shown promise to improve the quality of healthcare decisions. However, AI can be biased in a manner that produces unfair predictions for certain demographic subgroups. In MIMIC-CXR, a publicly available dataset of over 300,000 chest X-ray images, diagnostic AI has been shown to have a higher false negative rate for racial minorities. We evaluated the capacity of synthetic data augmentation, oversampling, and demographic-based corrections to enhance the fairness of AI predictions. We show that adjusting unfair predictions for demographic attributes, such as race, is ineffective at improving fairness or predictive performance. However, using oversampling and synthetic data augmentation to modify disease prevalence reduced such disparities by 74.7% and 10.6%, respectively. Moreover, such fairness gains were accomplished without reduction in performance (95% CI AUC: [0.816, 0.820] versus [0.810, 0.819] versus [0.817, 0.821] for baseline, oversampling, and augmentation, respectively).