Efficient evaluation of soft tissues and bony structures following cervical spine trauma is critical. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic validity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based synthetic CT (sCT) compared with conventional computed tomography (CT) for cervical spine injuries. In a prospective, multicenter study, patients with cervical spine injuries underwent CT and MRI within 48 h after injury. A panel of five clinicians independently reviewed the images for diagnostic accuracy, lesion characterization (AO Spine classification), and soft tissue trauma. Fracture visibility, anterior (AVH) and posterior wall height (PVH), vertebral body angle (VBA), segmental kyphosis (SK), with corresponding interobserver reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC)) and intermodal differences (Fleiss' Kappa), were recorded. The accuracy of estimating Hounsfield unit (HU) values and mean cortical surface distances were measured. Thirty-seven patients (44 cervical spine fractures) were enrolled. sCT demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.3% for visualizing fractures. Intermodal agreement regarding injury classification indicated almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.922; p < 0.001). Inter-reader ICCs were good to excellent (CT vs. sCT): AVH (0.88, 0.87); PVH (0.87, 0.88); VBA (0.78, 0.76); SK (0.77, 0.93). Intermodal agreement showed a mean absolute difference of 0.3 mm (AVH), 0.3 mm (PVH), 1.15° (VBA) and 0.51° (SK), respectively. MRI visualized additional soft tissue trauma in 56.8% of patients. Voxelwise comparisons of sCT showed good to excellent agreement with CT in terms of HUs (mean absolute error of 20 (SD ± 62)) and a mean absolute cortical surface distance of 0.45 mm (SD ± 0.13). sCT is a promising, radiation-free imaging technique for diagnosing cervical spine injuries with similar accuracy to CT. Question Assessing the accuracy of MRI-based synthetic CT (sCT) for fracture visualization and classification in comparison to the gold standard of CT for cervical spine injuries. Findings sCT demonstrated a 97.3% sensitivity in detecting fractures and exhibited near-perfect intermodal agreement in classifying injuries according to the AO Spine classification system. Clinical relevance sCT is a promising, radiation-free imaging modality that offers comparable accuracy to CT in visualizing and classifying cervical spine injuries. The combination of conventional MRI sequences for soft tissue evaluation with sCT reconstruction for bone visualization provides comprehensive diagnostic information.

To develop an early budget impact analysis of and inform future research on the national adoption of a commercially available AI application to support clinicians reviewing radiographs for suspected fractures across NHS emergency departments in England. A decision tree framework was coded to assess a change in outcomes for suspected fractures in adults when AI fracture detection was integrated into clinical workflow over a 1-year time horizon. Standard of care was the comparator scenario and the ground truth reference cases were characterised by radiology report findings. The effect of AI on assisting ED clinicians when detecting fractures was sourced from US literature. Data on resource use conditioned on the correct identification of a fracture in the ED was extracted from a London NHS trust. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for the influence of parameter uncertainty on results. In one year, an estimated 658,564 radiographs were performed in emergency departments across England for suspected wrist, ankle or hip fractures. The number of patients returning to the ED with a missed fracture was reduced by 21,674 cases and a reduction of 20, 916 unnecessary referrals to fracture clinics. The cost of current practice was estimated at £66,646,542 and £63,012,150 with the integration of AI. Overall, generating a return on investment of £3,634,392 to the NHS. The adoption of AI in EDs across England has the potential to generate cost savings. However, additional evidence on radiograph review accuracy and subsequent resource use is required to further demonstrate this.

Early detection is clinically crucial for the strategic handling of sarcopenia, yet the screening process, which includes assessments of muscle mass, strength, and function, remains complex and difficult to access. This study aims to develop a convolutional neural network model based on ultrasound images to simplify the diagnostic process and promote its accessibility. This study prospectively evaluated 357 participants (101 with sarcopenia and 256 without sarcopenia) for training, encompassing three types of data: muscle ultrasound images, clinical information, and laboratory information. Three monomodal models based on each data type were developed in the training cohort. The data type with the best diagnostic performance was selected to develop the bimodal and multimodal model by adding another one or two data types. Subsequently, the diagnostic performance of the above models was compared. The contribution ratios of different data types were further analyzed for the multimodal model. A sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding 86 cases with missing values and retaining 271 complete cases for robustness validation. By comprehensive comparison, we finally identified the optimal model (SARCO model) as the convenient solution. Moreover, the SARCO model underwent an external validation with 145 participants (68 with sarcopenia and 77 without sarcopenia) and a proof-of-concept validation with 82 participants (19 with sarcopenia and 63 without sarcopenia) from two other hospitals. The monomodal model based on ultrasound images achieved the highest area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.827 and F1-score of 0.738 among the three monomodal models. Sensitivity analysis on complete data further confirmed the superiority of the ultrasound images model (AUC: 0.851; F1-score: 0.698). The performance of the multimodal model demonstrated statistical differences compared to the best monomodal model (AUC: 0.845 vs 0.827; P=.02) as well as the two bimodal models based on ultrasound images+clinical information (AUC: 0.845 vs 0.826; P=.03) and ultrasound images+laboratory information (AUC: 0.845 vs 0.832, P=0.035). On the other hand, ultrasound images contributed the most evidence for diagnosing sarcopenia (0.787) and nonsarcopenia (0.823) in the multimodal models. Sensitivity analysis showed consistent performance trends, with ultrasound images remaining the dominant contributor (Shapley additive explanation values: 0.810 for sarcopenia and 0.795 for nonsarcopenia). After comprehensive clinical analysis, the monomodal model based on ultrasound images was identified as the SARCO model. Subsequently, the SARCO model achieved satisfactory prediction performance in the external validation and proof-of-concept validation, with AUCs of 0.801 and 0.757 and F1-scores of 0.727 and 0.666, respectively. All three types of data contributed to sarcopenia diagnosis, while ultrasound images played a dominant role in model decision-making. The SARCO model based on ultrasound images is potentially the most convenient solution for diagnosing sarcopenia. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300073651; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=199199.

While several artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted medical imaging applications are reported in the recent orthopaedic literature, comparison of the clinical efficacy and utility of these applications is currently lacking. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of AI applications in orthopaedic imaging, focusing on their impact on diagnostic accuracy, image segmentation and operational efficiency across various imaging modalities. Based on the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases was performed, using combinations of keywords and MeSH descriptors ('AI', 'ML', 'deep learning', 'orthopaedic surgery' and 'imaging') from inception to March 2024. Included were studies published between September 2018 and February 2024, which evaluated machine learning (ML) model effectiveness in improving orthopaedic imaging. Studies with insufficient data regarding the output variable used to assess the reliability of the ML model, those applying deterministic algorithms, unrelated topics, protocol studies, and other systematic reviews were excluded from the final synthesis. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tool and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool were applied for the assessment of bias among the included studies. The 53 included studies reported the use of 11.990.643 images from several diagnostic instruments. A total of 39 studies reported details in terms of the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), while both accuracy and sensitivity were documented across 15 studies. Precision was reported by 14, specificity by nine, and the F1 score by four of the included studies. Three studies applied the area under the curve (AUC) method to evaluate ML model performance. Among the studies included in the final synthesis, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) emerged as the most frequently applied category of ML models, present in 17 studies (32%). The systematic review highlights the diverse application of AI in orthopaedic imaging, demonstrating the capability of various machine learning models in accurately segmenting and analysing orthopaedic images. The results indicate that AI models achieve high performance metrics across different imaging modalities. However, the current body of literature lacks comprehensive statistical analysis and randomized controlled trials, underscoring the need for further research to validate these findings in clinical settings. Systematic Review; Level of evidence IV.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) based three-dimensional analysis of knee cartilage has evolved to become fully automatic. However, when implementing these measurements across multiple clinical centers, scanner variability becomes a critical consideration. Our purposes were to quantify and compare same-model variability (between repeated scans on the same MRI system) and cross-model variability (across different MRI systems) in knee cartilage thickness measurements using MRI scanners from five manufacturers, as analyzed with a specific 3D volume analysis software. Ten healthy volunteers (eight males and two females, aged 22-60 years) underwent two scans of their right knee on 3T MRI systems from five manufacturers (Canon, Fujifilm, GE, Philips, and Siemens). The imaging protocol included fat-suppressed spoiled gradient echo and proton density weighted sequences. Cartilage regions were automatically segmented into 7 subregions using a specific deep learning-based 3D volume analysis software. This resulted in 350 measurements for same-model variability and 2,800 measurements for cross-model variability. For same-model variability, 82% of measurements showed variability ≤0.10 mm, and 98% showed variability ≤0.20 mm. For cross-model variability, 51% showed variability ≤0.10 mm, and 84% showed variability ≤0.20 mm. The mean same-model variability (0.06 ± 0.05 mm) was significantly lower than cross-model variability (0.11 ± 0.09 mm) (p < 0.001). This study demonstrates that knee cartilage thickness measurements exhibit significantly higher variability across different MRI systems compared to repeated measurements on the same system, when analyzed using this specific software. This finding has important implications for multi-center studies and longitudinal assessments using different MRI systems and highlights the software-dependent nature of such variability assessments.

To investigate the efficacy of CT measurement parameters combined with AI-assisted 3D planning for personalized femoral prosthesis selection in total hip arthroplasty (THA). A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 247 patients with unilateral hip or knee joint disorders treated at Renmin Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine between April 2021 and February 2024. All patients underwent preoperative full-pelvis and bilateral full-length femoral CT scans. The raw CT data were imported into Mimics 19.0 software to reconstruct a three-dimensional (3D) model of the healthy femur. Using 3-matic Research 11.0 software, the femoral head rotation center was located, and parameters including femoral head diameter (FHD), femoral neck length (FNL), femoral neck-shaft angle (FNSA), femoral offset (FO), femoral neck anteversion angle (FNAA), tip-apex distance (TAD), and tip-apex angle (TAA) were measured. AI-assisted THA 3D planning system AIJOINT V1.0.0.0 software was used for preoperative planning and design, enabling personalized selection of femoral prostheses with varying neck-shaft angles and surgical simulation. Groups were compared by gender, age, and parameters. ROC curves evaluated prediction efficacy. Females exhibited smaller FHD, FNL, FO, TAD, TAA but larger FNSA/FNAA vs males (P<0.05). Patients >65 years had higher FO, TAD, TAA (P<0.05). TAD-TAA correlation was strong (r=0.954), while FNSA negatively correlated with TAD/TAA (r=-0.773/-0.701). ROC analysis demonstrated high predictive accuracy: TAD (AUC=0.891, sensitivity=91.7%, specificity=87.6%) and TAA (AUC=0.882, sensitivity=100%, specificity=88.8%). CT parameters (TAA, TAD, FNSA, FO) are interrelated and effective predictors for femoral prosthesis selection. Integration with AI-assisted planning optimizes personalized THA, reducing biomechanical mismatch risks.

Cervical spine disorders are becoming increasingly common, particularly among sedentary populations. The accurate segmentation of cervical vertebrae is critical for diagnostic and research applications. Traditional segmentation methods are limited in terms of precision and applicability across imaging modalities. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate a fully automatic segmentation method and a user-friendly tool for detecting cervical vertebral body using a combined neural network model based on the YOLOv11 and U-Net3 + models. A dataset of X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images was collected, enhanced, and annotated to include 2136 X-ray images and 2184 MRI images. The proposed YOLO-UNet ensemble model was trained and compared with four other groups of image extraction models, including YOLOv11, DeepLabV3+, U-Net3 + for direct image segmentation, and the YOLO-DeepLab network. The evaluation metrics included the Dice coefficient, Hausdorff distance, intersection over union, positive predictive value, and sensitivity. The YOLO-UNet model combined the advantages of the YOLO and U-Net models and demonstrated excellent vertebral body segmentation capabilities on both X-ray and MRI datasets, which were closer to the ground truth images. Compared with other models, it achieved greater accuracy and a more accurate depiction of the vertebral body shape, demonstrated better versatility, and exhibited superior performance across all evaluation indicators. The YOLO-UNet network model provided a robust and versatile solution for cervical vertebral body segmentation, demonstrating excellent accuracy and adaptability across imaging modalities on both X-ray and MRI datasets. The accompanying user-friendly tool enhanced usability, making it accessible to both clinical and research users. In this study, the challenge of large-scale medical annotation tasks was addressed, thereby reducing project costs and supporting advancements in medical information technology and clinical research.

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a leading cause of disability globally. Early and accurate diagnosis is paramount in preventing its progression and improving patients' quality of life. However, the inconsistency in radiologists' expertise and the onset of visual fatigue during prolonged image analysis often compromise diagnostic accuracy, highlighting the need for automated diagnostic solutions. In this study, we present an advanced deep learning model, OA-HybridCNN (OHC), which integrates ResNet and DenseNet architectures. This integration effectively addresses the gradient vanishing issue in DenseNet and augments prediction accuracy. To evaluate its performance, we conducted a thorough comparison with other deep learning models using five-fold cross-validation and external tests. The OHC model outperformed its counterparts across all performance metrics. In external testing, OHC exhibited an accuracy of 91.77%, precision of 92.34%, and recall of 91.36%. During the five-fold cross-validation, its average AUC and ACC were 86.34% and 87.42%, respectively. Deep learning, particularly exemplified by the OHC model, has greatly improved the efficiency and accuracy of KOA imaging diagnosis. The adoption of such technologies not only alleviates the burden on radiologists but also significantly enhances diagnostic precision.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising and powerful technology with increasing use in orthopedics. The global morbidity of knee arthroplasty is expanding. This study investigated the use of AI algorithms to review radiographs of knee arthroplasty. The Ovid-Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WeiPu (VIP), WanFang, and China Biology Medicine (CBM) databases were systematically screened from inception to March 2024 (PROSPERO study protocol registration: CRD42024507549). The quality assessment of the diagnostic accuracy studies tool assessed the risk of bias. A total of 21 studies were included in the analysis. Of these, 10 studies identified and classified implant brands, 6 measured implant size and component alignment, 3 detected implant loosening, and 2 diagnosed prosthetic joint infections (PJI). For classifying and identifying implant brands, 5 studies demonstrated near-perfect prediction with an area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.98 to 1.0, and 10 achieved accuracy (ACC) between 96-100%. Regarding implant measurement, one study showed an AUC of 0.62, and two others exhibited over 80% ACC in determining component sizes. Moreover, Artificial intelligence showed good to excellent reliability across all angles in three separate studies (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient > 0.78). In predicting PJI, one study achieved an AUC of 0.91 with a corresponding ACC of 90.5%, while another reported a positive predictive value ranging from 75% to 85%. For detecting implant loosening, the AUC was found to be at least as high as 0.976 with ACC ranging from 85.8% to 97.5%. These studies show that AI is promising in recognizing implants in knee arthroplasty. Future research should follow a rigorous approach to AI development, with comprehensive and transparent reporting of methods and the creation of open-source software programs and commercial tools that can provide clinicians with objective clinical decisions.

This narrative review outlines the current applications and considerations of artificial intelligence (AI) for diagnosis, management, and prognosis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Advances in AI, mainly in machine learning and deep learning, have significantly influenced medical research and clinical practice over the past decades by offering precisions in data understanding and treatment approaches. AI applications have enhanced risk prediction models, early diagnosis, and better management in RA. Predictive models have guided treatment decisions such as-response to methotrexate and biologics-while wearable devices and electronic health records (EHR) improve disease activity monitoring. In addition, AI applications are reported as promising for the early identification of extra-articular involvements, prediction, detection, and assessment of comorbidities. In axSpA, AI-driven models using imaging techniques such as sacroiliac radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography have increased diagnostic accuracy, especially for early inflammatory changes. Predictive algorithms help stratify and predict disease outcomes, while clinical decision support systems integrate clinical and imaging data for optimized management. For PsA, AI has also allowed for early detection among psoriasis patients using genetic markers, immune profiling, and EHR-based natural language processing systems. Overall, AI models may predict diagnosis, disease severity, treatment response, and comorbidities to improve care in patients with RA, axSpA, and PsA. As a rapidly developing and improving area, AI has the potential to change our current perspective of medical practice by offering better diagnostic evaluation and treatments and improved patient follow-up. Multimodal AI, focusing on collaboration, reliability, transparency, and patient-centered innovation, looks like the future of medical practice. However, data quality, model interpretability, and ethical considerations must be addressed to ensure reliable and equitable applications in clinical practice.