Automatic radiology report generation can enhance diagnostic efficiency and accuracy. However, clean open-source imaging scan-report pairs are limited in scale and variety. Moreover, the vast amount of radiological texts available online is often too noisy to be directly employed. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel task called Noisy Report Refinement (NRR), which generates radiology reports from noisy free-texts. To achieve this, we propose a report refinement pipeline that leverages large language models (LLMs) enhanced with guided self-critique and report selection strategies. To address the inability of existing radiology report generation metrics in measuring cleanliness, radiological usefulness, and factual correctness across various modalities of reports in NRR task, we introduce a new benchmark, NRRBench, for NRR evaluation. This benchmark includes two online-sourced datasets and four clinically explainable LLM-based metrics: two metrics evaluate the matching rate of radiology entities and modality-specific template attributes respectively, one metric assesses report cleanliness, and a combined metric evaluates overall NRR performance. Experiments demonstrate that guided self-critique and report selection strategies significantly improve the quality of refined reports. Additionally, our proposed metrics show a much higher correlation with noisy rate and error count of reports than radiology report generation metrics in evaluating NRR.

Breast cancer poses a serious threat to women's health, and its early detection is crucial for enhancing patient survival rates. While deep learning has significantly advanced mammographic image analysis, existing methods struggle to balance between view consistency with input adaptability. Furthermore, current models face challenges in accurately capturing multi-scale features, especially when subtle lesion variations across different scales are involved. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a Hybrid View Learning (HVL) paradigm that unifies traditional Single-View and Multi-View Learning approaches. The core component of this paradigm, our Attention-based Hybrid View Learning (AHVL) framework, incorporates two essential attention mechanisms: Contrastive Switch Attention (CSA) and Selective Pooling Attention (SPA). The CSA mechanism flexibly alternates between self-attention and cross-attention based on data integrity, integrating a pre-trained language model for contrastive learning to enhance model stability. Meanwhile, the SPA module employs multi-scale feature pooling and selection to capture critical features from mammographic images, overcoming the limitations of traditional models that struggle with fine-grained lesion detection. Experimental validation on the INbreast and CBIS-DDSM datasets shows that the AHVL framework outperforms both single-view and multi-view methods, especially under extreme view missing conditions. Even with an 80% missing rate on both datasets, AHVL maintains the highest accuracy and experiences the smallest performance decline in metrics like F1 score and AUC-PR, demonstrating its robustness and stability. This study redefines mammographic image analysis by leveraging attention-based hybrid view processing, setting a new standard for precise and efficient breast cancer diagnosis.

Alzheimer's disease (AD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, is the leading cause of dementia worldwide and remains incurable once it begins. Therefore, early and accurate diagnosis is essential for effective intervention. Leveraging recent advances in deep learning, this study proposes a novel diagnostic model based on the 3D-ResNet architecture to classify three cognitive states: AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and cognitively normal (CN) individuals, using MRI data. The model integrates the strengths of ResNet and 3D convolutional neural networks (3D-CNN), and incorporates a special attention mechanism(SAM) within the residual structure to enhance feature representation. The study utilized the ADNI dataset, comprising 800 brain MRI scans. The dataset was split in a 7:3 ratio for training and testing, and the network was trained using data augmentation and cross-validation strategies. The proposed model achieved 92.33% accuracy in the three-class classification task, and 97.61%, 95.83%, and 93.42% accuracy in binary classifications of AD vs. CN, AD vs. MCI, and CN vs. MCI, respectively, outperforming existing state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, Grad-CAM heatmaps and 3D MRI reconstructions revealed that the cerebral cortex and hippocampus are critical regions for AD classification. These findings demonstrate a robust and interpretable AI-based diagnostic framework for AD, providing valuable technical support for its timely detection and clinical intervention.

Deep learning for radiologic image analysis is a rapidly growing field in biomedical research and is likely to become a standard practice in modern medicine. On the publicly available NIH ChestX-ray14 dataset, containing X-ray images that are classified by the presence or absence of 14 different diseases, we reproduced an algorithm known as CheXNet, as well as explored other algorithms that outperform CheXNet's baseline metrics. Model performance was primarily evaluated using the F1 score and AUC-ROC, both of which are critical metrics for imbalanced, multi-label classification tasks in medical imaging. The best model achieved an average AUC-ROC score of 0.85 and an average F1 score of 0.39 across all 14 disease classifications present in the dataset.

The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of two multimodal models (GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro) with that of radiologists to generate differential diagnoses from textual context alone, key images alone, or a combination of both using complex neuroradiology cases. This retrospective study included neuroradiology cases from the "Diagnosis Please" series published in the Radiology journal between January 2008 and September 2024. The two multimodal models were asked to provide three differential diagnoses from textual context alone, key images alone, or the complete case. Six board-certified neuroradiologists solved the cases in the same setting, randomly assigned to two groups: context alone first and images alone first. Three radiologists solved the cases without, and then with the assistance of Gemini 1.5 Pro. An independent radiologist evaluated the quality of the image descriptions provided by GPT-4o and Gemini for each case. Differences in correct answers between multimodal models and radiologists were analyzed using McNemar test. GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro outperformed radiologists using clinical context alone (mean accuracy, 34.0 % [18/53] and 44.7 % [23.7/53] vs. 16.4 % [8.7/53]; both P < 0.01). Radiologists outperformed GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro using images alone (mean accuracy, 42.0 % [22.3/53] vs. 3.8 % [2/53], and 7.5 % [4/53]; both P < 0.01) and the complete cases (48.0 % [25.6/53] vs. 34.0 % [18/53], and 38.7 % [20.3/53]; both P < 0.001). While radiologists improved their accuracy when combining multimodal information (from 42.1 % [22.3/53] for images alone to 50.3 % [26.7/53] for complete cases; P < 0.01), GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro did not benefit from the multimodal context (from 34.0 % [18/53] for text alone to 35.2 % [18.7/53] for complete cases for GPT-4o; P = 0.48, and from 44.7 % [23.7/53] to 42.8 % [22.7/53] for Gemini 1.5 Pro; P = 0.54). Radiologists benefited significantly from the suggestion of Gemini 1.5 Pro, increasing their accuracy from 47.2 % [25/53] to 56.0 % [27/53] (P < 0.01). Both GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro correctly identified the imaging modality in 53/53 (100 %) and 51/53 (96.2 %) cases, respectively, but frequently failed to identify key imaging findings (43/53 cases [81.1 %] with incorrect identification of key imaging findings for GPT-4o and 50/53 [94.3 %] for Gemini 1.5). Radiologists show a specific ability to benefit from the integration of textual and visual information, whereas multimodal models mostly rely on the clinical context to suggest diagnoses.

Medical disease prediction, particularly through imaging, remains a challenging task due to the complexity and variability of medical data, including noise, ambiguity, and differing image quality. Recent deep learning models, including Knowledge Distillation (KD) methods, have shown promising results in brain tumor image identification but still face limitations in handling uncertainty and generalizing across diverse medical conditions. Traditional KD methods often rely on a context-unaware temperature parameter to soften teacher model predictions, which does not adapt effectively to varying uncertainty levels present in medical images. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework that integrates Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) for optimal teacher-student model selection and a novel context-aware predictor approach for temperature scaling. The proposed context-aware framework adjusts the temperature based on factors such as image quality, disease complexity, and teacher model confidence, allowing for more robust knowledge transfer. Additionally, ACO efficiently selects the most appropriate teacher-student model pair from a set of pre-trained models, outperforming current optimization methods by exploring a broader solution space and better handling complex, non-linear relationships within the data. The proposed framework is evaluated using three publicly available benchmark datasets, each corresponding to a distinct medical imaging task. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework significantly outperforms current state-of-the-art methods, achieving top accuracy rates: 98.01% on the MRI brain tumor (Kaggle) dataset, 92.81% on the Figshare MRI dataset, and 96.20% on the GastroNet dataset. This enhanced performance is further evidenced by the improved results, surpassing existing benchmarks of 97.24% (Kaggle), 91.43% (Figshare), and 95.00% (GastroNet).

Current methods for medical image segmentation primarily focus on extracting contextual feature information from the perspective of the whole image. While these methods have shown effective performance, none of them take into account the fact that pixels at the boundary and regions with a low number of class pixels capture more contextual feature information from other classes, leading to misclassification of pixels by unequal contextual feature information. In this paper, we propose a dual feature equalization network based on the hybrid architecture of Swin Transformer and Convolutional Neural Network, aiming to augment the pixel feature representations by image-level equalization feature information and class-level equalization feature information. Firstly, the image-level feature equalization module is designed to equalize the contextual information of pixels within the image. Secondly, we aggregate regions of the same class to equalize the pixel feature representations of the corresponding class by class-level feature equalization module. Finally, the pixel feature representations are enhanced by learning weights for image-level equalization feature information and class-level equalization feature information. In addition, Swin Transformer is utilized as both the encoder and decoder, thereby bolstering the ability of the model to capture long-range dependencies and spatial correlations. We conducted extensive experiments on Breast Ultrasound Images (BUSI), International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC2017), Automated Cardiac Diagnosis Challenge (ACDC) and PH$^2$ datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that our method have achieved state-of-the-art performance. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/JianJianYin/DFEN.

Artificial intelligence (AI) promises to compress stroke treatment timelines, yet its clinical return on investment remains uncertain. We interrogate state‑of‑the‑art AI platforms across imaging, workflow orchestration, and outcome prediction to clarify value drivers and execution risks. Convolutional, recurrent, and transformer architectures now trigger large‑vessel‑occlusion alerts, delineate ischemic core in seconds, and forecast 90‑day function. Commercial deployments-RapidAI, Viz.ai, Aidoc-report double‑digit reductions in door‑to‑needle metrics and expanded thrombectomy eligibility. However, dataset bias, opaque reasoning, and limited external validation constrain scalability. Hybrid image‑plus‑clinical models elevate predictive accuracy but intensify data‑governance demands. AI can operationalize precision stroke care, but enterprise‑grade adoption requires federated data pipelines, explainable‑AI dashboards, and fit‑for‑purpose regulation. Prospective multicenter trials and continuous lifecycle surveillance are mandatory to convert algorithmic promise into reproducible, equitable patient benefit.

The distribution of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in cystectomy patients is indicative of the incidence of postoperative complications. Existing VAT segmentation methods for computed tomography (CT) employing intensity thresholding have limitations relating to inter-observer variability. Moreover, the difficulty in creating ground-truth masks limits the development of deep learning (DL) models for this task. This paper introduces a novel method for VAT prediction in pre-cystectomy CT, which is fully automated and does not require ground-truth VAT masks for training, overcoming aforementioned limitations. We introduce the kernel density-enhanced VAT segmentator (KEVS), combining a DL semantic segmentation model, for multi-body feature prediction, with Gaussian kernel density estimation analysis of predicted subcutaneous adipose tissue to achieve accurate scan-specific predictions of VAT in the abdominal cavity. Uniquely for a DL pipeline, KEVS does not require ground-truth VAT masks. We verify the ability of KEVS to accurately segment abdominal organs in unseen CT data and compare KEVS VAT segmentation predictions to existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) approaches in a dataset of 20 pre-cystectomy CT scans, collected from University College London Hospital (UCLH-Cyst), with expert ground-truth annotations. KEVS presents a <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mrow><mn>4.80</mn> <mo>%</mo></mrow> </math> and <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mrow><mn>6.02</mn> <mo>%</mo></mrow> </math> improvement in Dice coefficient over the second best DL and thresholding-based VAT segmentation techniques respectively when evaluated on UCLH-Cyst. This research introduces KEVS, an automated, SOTA method for the prediction of VAT in pre-cystectomy CT which eliminates inter-observer variability and is trained entirely on open-source CT datasets which do not contain ground-truth VAT masks.

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone malignancy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improves survival rates. However, OS heterogeneity results in variable treatment responses, highlighting the need for reliable, non-invasive tools to predict NAC response. Radiomics-based machine learning (ML) offers potential for identifying imaging biomarkers to predict treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the accuracy and reliability of radiomics models for predicting NAC response in OS. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science up to November 2024. Studies using radiomics-based ML for NAC response prediction in OS were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for training and validation cohorts were calculated using bivariate random-effects modeling, with clinical-combined models analyzed separately. Quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool, radiomics quality score (RQS), and METRICS scores. Sixteen studies were included, with 63 % using MRI and 37 % using CT. Twelve studies, comprising 1639 participants, were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled metrics for training cohorts showed an AUC of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.89, and specificity of 0.85. Validation cohorts achieved an AUC of 0.87, sensitivity of 0.81, and specificity of 0.82. Clinical-combined models outperformed radiomics-only models. The mean RQS score was 9.44 ± 3.41, and the mean METRICS score was 60.8 % ± 17.4 %. Radiomics-based ML shows promise for predicting NAC response in OS, especially when combined with clinical indicators. However, limitations in external validation and methodological consistency must be addressed.