To evaluate the predictive ability of AI HIP in determining the size and position of prostheses during complex total hip arthroplasty (THA). Additionally, it investigates the factors influencing the accuracy of preoperative planning predictions. From April 2021 to December 2023, patients with complex hip joint diseases were divided into the AI preoperative planning group (n = 29) and the X-ray preoperative planning group (n = 27). Postoperative X-rays were used to measure acetabular anteversion angle, abduction angle, tip-to-sternum distance, intraoperative duration, blood loss, planning time, postoperative Harris Hip Scores (at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months), and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores (at 2 weeks and at final follow-up) to analyze clinical outcomes. On the acetabular side, the accuracy of AI preoperative planning was higher compared to X-ray preoperative planning (75.9% vs. 44.4%, P = 0.016). On the femoral side, AI preoperative planning also showed higher accuracy compared to X-ray preoperative planning (85.2% vs. 59.3%, P = 0.033). The AI preoperative planning group showed superior outcomes in terms of reducing bilateral leg length discrepancy (LLD), decreasing operative time and intraoperative blood loss, early postoperative recovery, and pain control compared to the X-ray preoperative planning group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding bilateral femoral offset (FO) differences, bilateral combined offset (CO) differences, abduction angle, anteversion angle, or tip-to-sternum distance. Factors such as gender, age, affected side, comorbidities, body mass index (BMI) classification, bone mineral density did not affect the prediction accuracy of AI HIP preoperative planning. Artificial intelligence-based 3D planning can be effectively utilized for preoperative planning in complex THA. Compared to X-ray templating, AI demonstrates superior accuracy in prosthesis measurement and provides significant clinical benefits, particularly in early postoperative recovery.

In knee osteoarthritis (KOA) treatment, preventive measures to reduce its onset risk are a key factor. Among individuals with radiographically healthy knees, however, future knee joint integrity and condition cannot be predicted by clinically applicable methods. We investigated if knee joint morphology derived from widely accessible and cost-effective radiographs could be helpful in predicting future knee joint integrity and condition. We combined knee joint morphology with known risk predictors such as age, height, and weight. Baseline data were utilized as predictors, and the maximal severity of KOA after 8 years served as a target variable. The three KOA categories in this study were based on Kellgren-Lawrence grading: healthy, moderate, and severe. We employed a two-stage machine learning model that utilized two random forest algorithms. We trained three models: the subject demographics (SD) model utilized only SD; the image model utilized only knee joint morphology from radiographs; the merged model utilized combined predictors. The training data comprised an 8-year follow-up of 1222 knees from 683 individuals. The SD- model obtained a weighted F1 score (WF1) of 77.2% and a balanced accuracy (BA) of 65.6%. The Image-model performance metrics were lowest, with a WF1 of 76.5% and BA of 63.8%. The top-performing merged model achieved a WF1 score of 78.3% and a BA of 68.2%. Our two-stage prediction model provided improved results based on performance metrics, suggesting potential for application in clinical settings.

Thoracolumbar stump ribs are one of the essential indicators of thoracolumbar transitional vertebrae or enumeration anomalies. While some studies manually assess these anomalies and describe the ribs qualitatively, this study aims to automate thoracolumbar stump rib detection and analyze their morphology quantitatively. To this end, we train a high-resolution deep-learning model for rib segmentation and show significant improvements compared to existing models (Dice score 0.997 vs. 0.779, p-value < 0.01). In addition, we use an iterative algorithm and piece-wise linear interpolation to assess the length of the ribs, showing a success rate of 98.2%. When analyzing morphological features, we show that stump ribs articulate more posteriorly at the vertebrae (-19.2 +- 3.8 vs -13.8 +- 2.5, p-value < 0.01), are thinner (260.6 +- 103.4 vs. 563.6 +- 127.1, p-value < 0.01), and are oriented more downwards and sideways within the first centimeters in contrast to full-length ribs. We show that with partially visible ribs, these features can achieve an F1-score of 0.84 in differentiating stump ribs from regular ones. We publish the model weights and masks for public use.

Supracondylar humerus fractures in children are among the most common elbow fractures in pediatrics. However, their diagnosis can be particularly challenging due to the anatomical characteristics and imaging features of the pediatric skeleton. In recent years, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have achieved notable success in medical image analysis, though their performance typically relies on large-scale, high-quality labeled datasets. Unfortunately, labeled samples for pediatric supracondylar fractures are scarce and difficult to obtain. To address this issue, this paper introduces a deep learning-based multi-scale patch residual network (MPR) for the automatic detection and localization of subtle pediatric supracondylar fractures. The MPR framework combines a CNN for automatic feature extraction with a multi-scale generative adversarial network to model skeletal integrity using healthy samples. By leveraging healthy images to learn the normal skeletal distribution, the approach reduces the dependency on labeled fracture data and effectively addresses the challenges posed by limited pediatric datasets. Datasets from two different hospitals were used, with data augmentation techniques applied during both training and validation. On an independent test set, the proposed model achieves an accuracy of 90.5%, with 89% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and an F1 score of 0.906-outperforming the diagnostic accuracy of emergency medicine physicians and approaching that of pediatric radiologists. Furthermore, the model demonstrates a fast inference speed of 1.1 s per sheet, underscoring its substantial potential for clinical application.

Accurate diagnosis of orthopedic injuries, especially pelvic and hip fractures, is vital in trauma management. While pelvic radiographs (PXRs) are widely used, misdiagnosis is common. This study proposes an automated system that uses convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to detect potential fracture areas and predict fracture conditions, aiming to outperform traditional object detection-based systems. We developed two deep learning models for hip fracture detection and prediction, trained on PXRs from three hospitals. The first model utilized automated hip area detection, cropping, and classification of the resulting patches. The images were preprocessed using the Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) algorithm. The YOLOv5 architecture was employed for the object detection model, while three different pre-trained deep neural network (DNN) architectures were used for classification, applying transfer learning. Their performance was evaluated on a test dataset, and compared with 35 clinicians. YOLOv5 achieved a 92.66% accuracy on regular images and 88.89% on CLAHE-enhanced images. The classifier models, MobileNetV2, Xception, and InceptionResNetV2, achieved accuracies between 94.66% and 97.67%. In contrast, the clinicians demonstrated a mean accuracy of 84.53% and longer prediction durations. The DNN models showed significantly better accuracy and speed compared to human evaluators (p < 0.0005, p < 0.01). These DNN models highlight promising utility in trauma diagnosis due to their high accuracy and speed. Integrating such systems into clinical practices may enhance the diagnostic efficiency of PXRs.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to identify post-operative risk factors for re-tearing an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using a combination of imaging signal intensity (SI) and cross-sectional area measurements of the healing ACL. During surgery micro-debris can result from drilling the osseous tunnels for graft and/or suture insertion. The debris presents a limitation when using post-surgical MRI to assess reinjury risk as it causes rapid magnetic field variations during acquisition, leading to signal loss within a voxel. The present study demonstrates how K-means clustering can refine an automatic segmentation algorithm to remove the lost signal intensity values induced by the artifacts in the image. MRI data were obtained from 82 patients enrolled in three prospective clinical trials of ACL surgery. Constructive Interference in Steady State MRIs were collected at 6 months post-operation. Manual segmentation of the ACL with metallic artifacts removed served as the gold standard. The accuracy of the automatic ACL segmentations was compared using Dice coefficient, sensitivity, and precision. The performance of the automatic segmentation was comparable to manual segmentation (Dice coefficient = .81, precision = .81, sensitivity = .82). The normalized average signal intensity was calculated as 1.06 (±0.25) for the automatic and 1.04 (±0.23) for the manual segmentation, yielding a difference of 2%. These metrics emphasize the automatic segmentation model's ability to precisely capture ACL signal intensity while excluding artifact regions. The automatic artifact segmentation model described here could enhance qMRI's clinical utility by allowing for more accurate and time-efficient segmentations of the ACL.

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone malignancy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improves survival rates. However, OS heterogeneity results in variable treatment responses, highlighting the need for reliable, non-invasive tools to predict NAC response. Radiomics-based machine learning (ML) offers potential for identifying imaging biomarkers to predict treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the accuracy and reliability of radiomics models for predicting NAC response in OS. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science up to November 2024. Studies using radiomics-based ML for NAC response prediction in OS were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for training and validation cohorts were calculated using bivariate random-effects modeling, with clinical-combined models analyzed separately. Quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool, radiomics quality score (RQS), and METRICS scores. Sixteen studies were included, with 63 % using MRI and 37 % using CT. Twelve studies, comprising 1639 participants, were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled metrics for training cohorts showed an AUC of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.89, and specificity of 0.85. Validation cohorts achieved an AUC of 0.87, sensitivity of 0.81, and specificity of 0.82. Clinical-combined models outperformed radiomics-only models. The mean RQS score was 9.44 ± 3.41, and the mean METRICS score was 60.8 % ± 17.4 %. Radiomics-based ML shows promise for predicting NAC response in OS, especially when combined with clinical indicators. However, limitations in external validation and methodological consistency must be addressed.

Efficient evaluation of soft tissues and bony structures following cervical spine trauma is critical. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic validity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based synthetic CT (sCT) compared with conventional computed tomography (CT) for cervical spine injuries. In a prospective, multicenter study, patients with cervical spine injuries underwent CT and MRI within 48 h after injury. A panel of five clinicians independently reviewed the images for diagnostic accuracy, lesion characterization (AO Spine classification), and soft tissue trauma. Fracture visibility, anterior (AVH) and posterior wall height (PVH), vertebral body angle (VBA), segmental kyphosis (SK), with corresponding interobserver reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC)) and intermodal differences (Fleiss' Kappa), were recorded. The accuracy of estimating Hounsfield unit (HU) values and mean cortical surface distances were measured. Thirty-seven patients (44 cervical spine fractures) were enrolled. sCT demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.3% for visualizing fractures. Intermodal agreement regarding injury classification indicated almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.922; p < 0.001). Inter-reader ICCs were good to excellent (CT vs. sCT): AVH (0.88, 0.87); PVH (0.87, 0.88); VBA (0.78, 0.76); SK (0.77, 0.93). Intermodal agreement showed a mean absolute difference of 0.3 mm (AVH), 0.3 mm (PVH), 1.15° (VBA) and 0.51° (SK), respectively. MRI visualized additional soft tissue trauma in 56.8% of patients. Voxelwise comparisons of sCT showed good to excellent agreement with CT in terms of HUs (mean absolute error of 20 (SD ± 62)) and a mean absolute cortical surface distance of 0.45 mm (SD ± 0.13). sCT is a promising, radiation-free imaging technique for diagnosing cervical spine injuries with similar accuracy to CT. Question Assessing the accuracy of MRI-based synthetic CT (sCT) for fracture visualization and classification in comparison to the gold standard of CT for cervical spine injuries. Findings sCT demonstrated a 97.3% sensitivity in detecting fractures and exhibited near-perfect intermodal agreement in classifying injuries according to the AO Spine classification system. Clinical relevance sCT is a promising, radiation-free imaging modality that offers comparable accuracy to CT in visualizing and classifying cervical spine injuries. The combination of conventional MRI sequences for soft tissue evaluation with sCT reconstruction for bone visualization provides comprehensive diagnostic information.

To develop an early budget impact analysis of and inform future research on the national adoption of a commercially available AI application to support clinicians reviewing radiographs for suspected fractures across NHS emergency departments in England. A decision tree framework was coded to assess a change in outcomes for suspected fractures in adults when AI fracture detection was integrated into clinical workflow over a 1-year time horizon. Standard of care was the comparator scenario and the ground truth reference cases were characterised by radiology report findings. The effect of AI on assisting ED clinicians when detecting fractures was sourced from US literature. Data on resource use conditioned on the correct identification of a fracture in the ED was extracted from a London NHS trust. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for the influence of parameter uncertainty on results. In one year, an estimated 658,564 radiographs were performed in emergency departments across England for suspected wrist, ankle or hip fractures. The number of patients returning to the ED with a missed fracture was reduced by 21,674 cases and a reduction of 20, 916 unnecessary referrals to fracture clinics. The cost of current practice was estimated at £66,646,542 and £63,012,150 with the integration of AI. Overall, generating a return on investment of £3,634,392 to the NHS. The adoption of AI in EDs across England has the potential to generate cost savings. However, additional evidence on radiograph review accuracy and subsequent resource use is required to further demonstrate this.

Early detection is clinically crucial for the strategic handling of sarcopenia, yet the screening process, which includes assessments of muscle mass, strength, and function, remains complex and difficult to access. This study aims to develop a convolutional neural network model based on ultrasound images to simplify the diagnostic process and promote its accessibility. This study prospectively evaluated 357 participants (101 with sarcopenia and 256 without sarcopenia) for training, encompassing three types of data: muscle ultrasound images, clinical information, and laboratory information. Three monomodal models based on each data type were developed in the training cohort. The data type with the best diagnostic performance was selected to develop the bimodal and multimodal model by adding another one or two data types. Subsequently, the diagnostic performance of the above models was compared. The contribution ratios of different data types were further analyzed for the multimodal model. A sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding 86 cases with missing values and retaining 271 complete cases for robustness validation. By comprehensive comparison, we finally identified the optimal model (SARCO model) as the convenient solution. Moreover, the SARCO model underwent an external validation with 145 participants (68 with sarcopenia and 77 without sarcopenia) and a proof-of-concept validation with 82 participants (19 with sarcopenia and 63 without sarcopenia) from two other hospitals. The monomodal model based on ultrasound images achieved the highest area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.827 and F1-score of 0.738 among the three monomodal models. Sensitivity analysis on complete data further confirmed the superiority of the ultrasound images model (AUC: 0.851; F1-score: 0.698). The performance of the multimodal model demonstrated statistical differences compared to the best monomodal model (AUC: 0.845 vs 0.827; P=.02) as well as the two bimodal models based on ultrasound images+clinical information (AUC: 0.845 vs 0.826; P=.03) and ultrasound images+laboratory information (AUC: 0.845 vs 0.832, P=0.035). On the other hand, ultrasound images contributed the most evidence for diagnosing sarcopenia (0.787) and nonsarcopenia (0.823) in the multimodal models. Sensitivity analysis showed consistent performance trends, with ultrasound images remaining the dominant contributor (Shapley additive explanation values: 0.810 for sarcopenia and 0.795 for nonsarcopenia). After comprehensive clinical analysis, the monomodal model based on ultrasound images was identified as the SARCO model. Subsequently, the SARCO model achieved satisfactory prediction performance in the external validation and proof-of-concept validation, with AUCs of 0.801 and 0.757 and F1-scores of 0.727 and 0.666, respectively. All three types of data contributed to sarcopenia diagnosis, while ultrasound images played a dominant role in model decision-making. The SARCO model based on ultrasound images is potentially the most convenient solution for diagnosing sarcopenia. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300073651; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=199199.