Accurately registering intraoral and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in patients with metal artifacts poses a significant challenge. Whether a cloud-based platform trained for artificial intelligence (AI)-driven segmentation can improve registration is unclear. The purpose of this clinical study was to validate a cloud-based platform trained for the AI-driven segmentation of prosthetic crowns on CBCT scans and subsequent multimodal intraoral scan-to-CBCT registration in the presence of high metal artifact expression. A dataset consisting of 30 time-matched maxillary and mandibular CBCT and intraoral scans, each containing at least 4 prosthetic crowns, was collected. CBCT acquisition involved placing cotton rolls between the cheeks and teeth to facilitate soft tissue delineation. Segmentation and registration were compared using either a semi-automated (SA) method or an AI-automated (AA). SA served as clinical reference, where prosthetic crowns and their radicular parts (natural roots or implants) were threshold-based segmented with point surface-based registration. The AA method included fully automated segmentation and registration based on AI algorithms. Quantitative assessment compared AA's median surface deviation (MSD) and root mean square (RMS) in crown segmentation and subsequent intraoral scan-to-CBCT registration with those of SA. Additionally, segmented crown STL files were voxel-wise analyzed for comparison between AA and SA. A qualitative assessment of AA-based crown segmentation evaluated the need for refinement, while the AA-based registration assessment scrutinized the alignment of the registered-intraoral scan with the CBCT teeth and soft tissue contours. Ultimately, the study compared the time efficiency and consistency of both methods. Quantitative outcomes were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Student t tests, and qualitative outcomes with the Wilcoxon test (all α=.05). Consistency was evaluated by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Quantitatively, AA methods excelled with a 0.91 Dice Similarity Coefficient for crown segmentation and an MSD of 0.03 ±0.05 mm for intraoral scan-to-CBCT registration. Additionally, AA achieved 91% clinically acceptable matches of teeth and gingiva on CBCT scans, surpassing SA method's 80%. Furthermore, AA was significantly faster than SA (P<.05), being 200 times faster in segmentation and 4.5 times faster in registration. Both AA and SA exhibited excellent consistency in segmentation and registration, with ICC values of 0.99 and 1 for AA and 0.99 and 0.96 for SA, respectively. The novel cloud-based platform demonstrated accurate, consistent, and time-efficient prosthetic crown segmentation, as well as intraoral scan-to-CBCT registration in scenarios with high artifact expression.

To determine the accuracy of automatic Cobb angle measurements by deep learning (DL) on full spine radiographs. Full spine radiographs of patients aged > 2 years were screened using the radiology reports to identify radiographs for performing Cobb angle measurements. Two senior musculoskeletal radiologists and one senior orthopedic surgeon independently annotated Cobb angles exceeding 7° indicating the angle location as either proximal thoracic (apices between T3 and T5), main thoracic (apices between T6 and T11), or thoraco-lumbar (apices between T12 and L4). If at least two readers agreed on the number of angles, location of the angles, and difference between comparable angles was < 8°, then the ground truth was defined as the mean of their measurements. Otherwise, the radiographs were reviewed by the three annotators in consensus. The DL software (BoneMetrics, Gleamer) was evaluated against the manual annotation in terms of mean absolute error (MAE). A total of 345 patients were included in the study (age 33 ± 24 years, 221 women): 179 pediatric patients (< 22 years old) and 166 adult patients (22 to 85 years old). Fifty-three cases were reviewed in consensus. The MAE of the DL algorithm for the main curvature was 2.6° (95% CI [2.0; 3.3]). For the subgroup of pediatric patients, the MAE was 1.9° (95% CI [1.6; 2.2]) versus 3.3° (95% CI [2.2; 4.8]) for adults. The DL algorithm predicted the Cobb angle of scoliotic patients with high accuracy.

To assess the impact of artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction algorithms (AIIR) on image quality with phantom and clinical studies. The phantom images were reconstructed with the hybrid iterative algorithm (HIR: Karl 3D-3, 5, 7, 9) and AIIR (grades 1-5) algorithm. Noise power spectra (NPS), task transfer functions (TTF) were measured, and additionally sharpness was assessed using a "blur metric" procedure. Sixty-two consecutive patients underwent standard-dose and low-dose unenhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans, i.e., SDCT and LDCT groups, respectively. The SDCT images reconstructed using the Karl 3D-5, and the LDCT images reconstructed using the Karl 3D-5 and the AIIR-3 and 5, respectively. CT values, standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed for hepatic parenchyma and paravertebral muscles. Images were independently evaluated by two radiologists for image-quality, noise, sharpness, and lesion diagnostic confidence. In the phantom study, AIIR algorithm provided higher TTF_50% and NPS average spatial frequency compared to HIR. In the clinical study, there was no statistically significant difference in CT values among the four reconstruction images (p > 0.05). The LDCT group AIIR-3 obtained the lowest SD values and the highest mean CNR and SNR values compared to the other three groups (p < 0.05). For qualitative assessment, the image subjective characteristic scores of AIIR-5 in the LDCT group, compared with the SDCT group, were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). AIIR reduces radiation dose levels by approximately 78% and still maintains the image quality of unenhanced abdominal CT compared to HIR with SDCT. NCT06142539.

We report our experience implementing an algorithm for the detection of large vessel occlusion (LVO) for suspected stroke in the emergency setting, including its performance, and offer an explanation as to why it was poorly received by radiologists. An algorithm was deployed in the emergency room at a single tertiary care hospital for the detection of LVO on CT angiography (CTA) between September 1st-27th, 2021. A retrospective analysis of the algorithm's accuracy was performed. During the study period, 48 patients underwent CTA examination in the emergency department to evaluate for emergent LVO, with 2 positive cases (60.3 years ± 18.2; 32 women). The LVO algorithm demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 92%, respectively. While the sensitivity of the algorithm at our institution was even higher than the manufacturer's reported values, the false discovery rate was 67%, leading to the perception that the algorithm was inaccurate. In addition, the positive predictive value at our institution was 33% compared with the manufacturer's reported values of 95-98%. This disparity can be attributed to differences in disease prevalence of 4.1% at our institution compared with 45.0-62.2% from the manufacturer's reported values. Despite the LVO algorithm's accuracy performing as advertised, it was perceived as inaccurate due to more false positives than anticipated and was removed from clinical practice. This was likely due to a cognitive bias called the accuracy paradox. To mitigate the accuracy paradox, radiologists should be presented with metrics based on a disease prevalence similar to their practice when evaluating and utilizing artificial intelligence tools. Question An artificial intelligence algorithm for detecting emergent LVOs was implemented in an emergency department, but it was perceived to be inaccurate. Findings Although the algorithm's accuracy was both high and as advertised, the algorithm demonstrated a high false discovery rate. Clinical relevance The misperception of the algorithm's inaccuracy was likely due to a special case of the base rate fallacy-the accuracy paradox. Equipping radiologists with an algorithm's false discovery rate based on local prevalence will ensure realistic expectations for real-world performance.

When antispasmodics are unavailable, the periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER; called BLADE by Siemens Healthineers) or half Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) is clinically used in gynecologic MRI. However, their imaging qualities are limited compared to Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) with antispasmodics. Even with antispasmodics, TSE can be artifact-affected, necessitating a rapid backup sequence. This study aimed to investigate the utility of HASTE with deep learning reconstruction and variable flip angle evolution (iHASTE) compared to conventional sequences with and without antispasmodics. This retrospective study included MRI scans without antispasmodics for 79 patients who underwent iHASTE, HASTE, and BLADE and MRI scans with antispasmodics for 79 case-control matched patients who underwent TSE. Three radiologists qualitatively evaluated image quality, robustness to artifacts, tissue contrast, and uterine lesion margins. Tissue contrast was also quantitatively evaluated. Quantitative evaluations revealed that iHASTE exhibited significantly superior tissue contrast to HASTE and BLADE. Qualitative evaluations indicated that iHASTE outperformed HASTE in overall quality. Two of three radiologists judged iHASTE to be significantly superior to BLADE, while two of three judged TSE to be significantly superior to iHASTE. iHASTE demonstrated greater robustness to artifacts than both BLADE and TSE. Lesion margins in iHASTE had lower scores than BLADE and TSE. iHASTE is a viable clinical option in patients undergoing gynecologic MRI with anti-spasmodics. iHASTE may also be considered as a useful add-on sequence in patients undergoing MRI with antispasmodics.

This study compared the characteristics of lesions suspicious for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and their LI-RADS classifications in adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) to those of MR images, along with radiologist confidence. This prospective single-center trial included patients who underwent four-phase liver CT and multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRI within 7 days from February to August 2023. The lesion characteristics, LI-RADS classifications and confidence scores according to two radiologists on the ASIR, DLR and MRI techniques were compared. If the patient had at least one lesion, he was included in the HCC group, otherwise in the non-HCC group. MRI being the technique with the best sensitivity, concordance of lesions characteristics and LI-RADS classifications were calculated by weighted kappa between the ASIR and MRI and between the DLR and MRI. The confidence scores are expressed as the means and standard deviations. Eighty-nine patients were enrolled, 52 in the HCC group (67 years ± 9 [mean ± SD], 46 men) and 37 in the non-HCC group (68 years ± 9, 33 men). The concordance coefficient between the LI-RADS classification by ASIR and MRI was 0.64 [0.52; 0.76], showing good agreement, that by DLR and MRI was 0.83 [0.73; 0.92], showing excellent agreement. The diagnostic confidence in ASIR was 3.31 ± 0.95 (mean ± SD) and 3.0 ± 1.11, that in the DLR was 3.9 ± 0.88 and 4.11 ± 0.75, that in the MRI was 4.46 ± 0.80 and 4.57 ± 0.80. DLR provided excellent LI-RADS classification concordance with MRI, whereas ASIR provided good concordance. The radiologists' confidence was greater in the DLR than in the ASIR but remained highest in the MR group. Question Does the use of deep learning reconstructions (DLR) improve LI-RADS classification of suspicious hepatocellular carcinoma lesions compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstructions (ASIR)? Findings DLR demonstrated superior concordance of LI-RADS classification with MRI compared to ASIR. It also provided greater diagnostic confidence than ASIR. Clinical relevance The use of DLR enhances radiologists' ability to visualize and characterize lesions suspected of being HCC, as well as their LI-RADS classification. Moreover, it also boosts their confidence in interpreting these images.

Evaluating the impact of an AI-based automated cardiac MRI (CMR) planning software on procedure errors and scan times compared to manual planning alone. Consecutive patients undergoing non-stress CMR were prospectively enrolled at a single center (August 2023-February 2024) and randomized into manual, or automated scan execution using prototype software. Patients with pacemakers, targeted indications, or inability to consent were excluded. All patients underwent the same CMR protocol with contrast, in breath-hold (BH) or free breathing (FB). Supervising radiologists recorded procedure errors (plane prescription, forgotten views, incorrect propagation of cardiac planes, and field-of-view mismanagement). Scan times and idle phase (non-acquisition portion) were computed from scanner logs. Most data were non-normally distributed and compared using non-parametric tests. Eighty-two patients (mean age, 51.6 years ± 17.5; 56 men) were included. Forty-four patients underwent automated and 38 manual CMRs. The mean rate of procedure errors was significantly (p = 0.01) lower in the automated (0.45) than in the manual group (1.13). The rate of error-free examinations was higher (p = 0.03) in the automated (31/44; 70.5%) than in the manual group (17/38; 44.7%). Automated studies were shorter than manual studies in FB (30.3 vs 36.5 min, p < 0.001) but had similar durations in BH (42.0 vs 43.5 min, p = 0.42). The idle phase was lower in automated studies for FB and BH strategies (both p < 0.001). An AI-based automated software performed CMR at a clinical level with fewer planning errors and improved efficiency compared to manual planning. Question What is the impact of an AI-based automated CMR planning software on procedure errors and scan times compared to manual planning alone? Findings Software-driven examinations were more reliable (71% error-free) than human-planned ones (45% error-free) and showed improved efficiency with reduced idle time. Clinical relevance CMR examinations require extensive technologist training, and continuous attention, and involve many planning steps. A fully automated software reliably acquired non-stress CMR potentially reducing mistake risk and increasing data homogeneity.

The aim of this study was to intraindividually compare the conspicuity of focal liver lesions (FLLs) between low- and ultra-low-dose computed tomography (CT) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and standard-dose CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) from a single CT using dual-split scan in patients with suspected liver metastasis via a noninferiority design. This prospective study enrolled participants who met the eligibility criteria at 2 tertiary hospitals in South Korea from June 2022 to January 2023. The criteria included ( a ) being aged between 20 and 85 years and ( b ) having suspected or known liver metastases. Dual-source CT scans were conducted, with the standard radiation dose divided in a 2:1 ratio between tubes A and B (67% and 33%, respectively). The voltage settings of 100/120 kVp were selected based on the participant's body mass index (<30 vs ≥30 kg/m 2 ). For image reconstruction, MBIR was utilized for standard-dose (100%) images, whereas DLR was employed for both low-dose (67%) and ultra-low-dose (33%) images. Three radiologists independently evaluated FLL conspicuity, the probability of metastasis, and subjective image quality using a 5-point Likert scale, in addition to quantitative signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios. The noninferiority margins were set at -0.5 for conspicuity and -0.1 for detection. One hundred thirty-three participants (male = 58, mean body mass index = 23.0 ± 3.4 kg/m 2 ) were included in the analysis. The low- and ultra-low- dose had a lower radiation dose than the standard-dose (median CT dose index volume: 3.75, 1.87 vs 5.62 mGy, respectively, in the arterial phase; 3.89, 1.95 vs 5.84 in the portal venous phase, P < 0.001 for all). Median FLL conspicuity was lower in the low- and ultra-low-dose scans compared with the standard-dose (3.0 [interquartile range, IQR: 2.0, 4.0], 3.0 [IQR: 1.0, 4.0] vs 3.0 [IQR: 2.0, 4.0] in the arterial phase; 4.0 [IQR: 1.0, 5.0], 3.0 [IQR: 1.0, 4.0] vs 4.0 [IQR: 2.0, 5.0] in the portal venous phases), yet within the noninferiority margin ( P < 0.001 for all). FLL detection was also lower but remained within the margin (lesion detection rate: 0.772 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.727, 0.812], 0.754 [0.708, 0.795], respectively) compared with the standard-dose (0.810 [95% CI: 0.770, 0.844]). Sensitivity for liver metastasis differed between the standard- (80.6% [95% CI: 76.0, 84.5]), low-, and ultra-low-doses (75.7% [95% CI: 70.2, 80.5], 73.7 [95% CI: 68.3, 78.5], respectively, P < 0.001 for both), whereas specificity was similar ( P > 0.05). Low- and ultra-low-dose CT with DLR showed noninferior FLL conspicuity and detection compared with standard-dose CT with MBIR. Caution is needed due to a potential decrease in sensitivity for metastasis ( clinicaltrials.gov/NCT05324046 ).

Knee kinematics during daily activities reflect disease severity preoperatively and are associated with clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is widely believed that measured kinematics would be useful for preoperative planning and postoperative assessment. Despite decades-long interest in measuring three-dimensional (3D) knee kinematics, no methods are available for routine, practical clinical examinations. We report a clinically practical method utilizing machine-learning-enhanced software and upgraded C-arm fluoroscopy for the accurate and time-efficient measurement of pre-TKA and post-TKA 3D dynamic knee kinematics. Using a common C-arm with an upgraded detector and software, we performed an 8-s horizontal sweeping pulsed fluoroscopic scan of the weight-bearing knee joint. The patient's knee was then imaged using pulsed C-arm fluoroscopy while performing standing, kneeling, squatting, stair, chair, and gait motion activities. We used limited-arc cone-beam reconstruction methods to create 3D models of the femur and tibia/fibula bones with implants, which can then be used to perform model-image registration to quantify the 3D knee kinematics. The proposed protocol can be accomplished by an individual radiology technician in ten minutes and does not require additional equipment beyond a step and stool. The image analysis can be performed by a computer onboard the upgraded c-arm or in the cloud, before loading the examination results into the Picture Archiving and Communication System and Electronic Medical Record systems. Weight-bearing kinematics affects knee function pre- and post-TKA. It has long been exclusively the domain of researchers to make such measurements. We present an approach that leverages common, but digitally upgraded, imaging hardware and software to implement an efficient examination protocol for accurately assessing 3D knee kinematics. With these capabilities, it will be possible to include dynamic 3D knee kinematics as a component of the routine clinical workup for patients who have diseased or replaced knees.

To assess the performance of a newly introduced deep learning-based reconstruction algorithm, namely the artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction (AIIR), in reducing the dose of pediatric chest CT by using the image data of below 3-year-old patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). The lung image available from routine-dose cardiac CT angiography (CTA) on below 3 years patients with CHD was employed as a reference for evaluating the paired low-dose chest CT. A total of 191 subjects were prospectively enrolled, where the dose for chest CT was reduced to ~0.1 mSv while the cardiac CTA protocol was kept unchanged. The low-dose chest CT images, obtained with the AIIR and the hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), were compared in image quality, ie, overall image quality and lung structure depiction, and in diagnostic performance, ie, severity assessment of pneumonia and airway stenosis. Compared with the reference, lung image quality was not found significantly different on low-dose AIIR images (all P >0.05) but obviously inferior with the HIR (all P <0.05). Compared with the HIR, low-dose AIIR images also achieved a closer pneumonia severity index (AIIR 4.32±3.82 vs. Ref 4.37±3.84, P >0.05; HIR 5.12±4.06 vs. Ref 4.37±3.84, P <0.05) and airway stenosis grading (consistently graded: AIIR 88.5% vs. HIR 56.5% ) to the reference. AIIR has the potential for large dose reduction in chest CT of patients below 3 years of age while preserving image quality and achieving diagnostic results nearly equivalent to routine dose scans.