Early and accurate detection of the bone fracture is paramount to initiating treatment as early as possible and avoiding any delay in patient treatment and outcomes. Interpretation of X-ray image is a time consuming and error prone task, especially when resources for such interpretation are limited by lack of radiology expertise. Additionally, deep learning approaches used currently, typically suffer from misclassifications and lack interpretable explanations to clinical use. In order to overcome these challenges, we propose an automated framework of bone fracture detection using a VGG-19 model modified to our needs. It incorporates sophisticated preprocessing techniques that include Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), Otsu's thresholding, and Canny edge detection, among others, to enhance image clarity as well as to facilitate the feature extraction. Therefore, we use Grad-CAM, an Explainable AI method that can generate visual heatmaps of the model's decision making process, as a type of model interpretability, for clinicians to understand the model's decision making process. It encourages trust and helps in further clinical validation. It is deployed in a real time web application, where healthcare professionals can upload X-ray images and get the diagnostic feedback within 0.5 seconds. The performance of our modified VGG-19 model attains 99.78\% classification accuracy and AUC score of 1.00, making it exceptionally good. The framework provides a reliable, fast, and interpretable solution for bone fracture detection that reasons more efficiently for diagnoses and better patient care.

Meniscal ramp lesions can impact knee stability, particularly when associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the primary diagnostic tool, its diagnostic accuracy remains suboptimal. We aimed to determine whether deep learning technology could enhance MRI-based ramp lesion detection. We reviewed the records of 236 patients who underwent arthroscopic procedures documenting ACL injuries and the status of the medial meniscal posterior horn. A deep learning model was developed using MRI data for ramp lesion detection. Ramp lesion risk factors among patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were analyzed using logistic regression, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and random forest models and were integrated into a final prediction model using Swin Transformer Large architecture. The deep learning model using MRI data demonstrated superior overall diagnostic performance to the clinicians' assessment (accuracy of 73.3% compared with 68.1%, specificity of 78.0% compared with 62.9%, and sensitivity of 64.7% compared with 76.4%). Incorporating risk factors (age, posteromedial tibial bone marrow edema, and lateral meniscal tears) improved the model's accuracy to 80.7%, with a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 80.9%. Integrating deep learning with MRI data and risk factors significantly enhanced diagnostic accuracy for ramp lesions, surpassing that of the model using MRI alone and that of clinicians. This study highlights the potential of artificial intelligence to provide clinicians with more accurate diagnostic tools for detecting ramp lesions, potentially enhancing treatment and patient outcomes. Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

In medical imaging, unsupervised out-of-distribution (OOD) detection offers an attractive approach for identifying pathological cases with extremely low incidence rates. In contrast to supervised methods, OOD-based approaches function without labels and are inherently robust to data imbalances. Current generative approaches often rely on likelihood estimation or reconstruction error, but these methods can be computationally expensive, unreliable, and require retraining if the inlier data changes. These limitations hinder their ability to distinguish nominal from anomalous inputs efficiently, consistently, and robustly. We propose a reconstruction-free OOD detection method that leverages the forward diffusion trajectories of a Stein score-based denoising diffusion model (SBDDM). By capturing trajectory curvature via the estimated Stein score, our approach enables accurate anomaly scoring with only five diffusion steps. A single SBDDM pre-trained on a large, semantically aligned medical dataset generalizes effectively across multiple Near-OOD and Far-OOD benchmarks, achieving state-of-the-art performance while drastically reducing computational cost during inference. Compared to existing methods, SBDDM achieves a relative improvement of up to 10.43% and 18.10% for Near-OOD and Far-OOD detection, making it a practical building block for real-time, reliable computer-aided diagnosis.

The Radiological Society of North America has actively promoted artificial intelligence (AI) challenges since 2017. Algorithms emerging from the recent RSNA 2022 Cervical Spine Fracture Detection Challenge demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in the competition's data set, surpassing results from prior publications. However, their performance in real-world clinical practice is not known. As an initial step toward the goal of assessing feasibility of these models in clinical practice, we conducted a generalizability test by using one of the leading algorithms of the competition. The deep learning algorithm was selected due to its performance, portability, and ease of use, and installed locally. One hundred examinations (50 consecutive cervical spine CT scans with at least 1 fracture present and 50 consecutive negative CT scans) from a level 1 trauma center not represented in the competition data set were processed at 6.4 seconds per examination. Ground truth was established based on the radiology report with retrospective confirmation of positive fracture cases. Sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and area under the curve were calculated. The external validation data set comprised older patients in comparison to the competition set (53.5 ± 21.8 years versus 58 ± 22.0, respectively; <i>P</i> < .05). Sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 70% in the external validation group and 85% and 94% in the competition group, respectively. Fractures misclassified by the convolutional neural networks frequently had features of advanced degenerative disease, subtle nondisplaced fractures not easily identified on the axial plane, and malalignment. The model performed with a similar sensitivity on the test and external data set, suggesting that such a tool could be potentially generalizable as a triage tool in the emergency setting. Discordant factors such as age-associated comorbidities may affect accuracy and specificity of AI models when used in certain populations. Further research should be encouraged to help elucidate the potential contributions and pitfalls of these algorithms in supporting clinical care.

Access to medical imaging and associated text data has the potential to drive major advances in healthcare research and patient outcomes. However, the presence of Protected Health Information (PHI) and Personally Identifiable Information (PII) in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files presents a significant barrier to the ethical and secure sharing of imaging datasets. This paper presents a hybrid de-identification framework developed by Impact Business Information Solutions (IBIS) that combines rule-based and AI-driven techniques, and rigorous uncertainty quantification for comprehensive PHI/PII removal from both metadata and pixel data. Our approach begins with a two-tiered rule-based system targeting explicit and inferred metadata elements, further augmented by a large language model (LLM) fine-tuned for Named Entity Recognition (NER), and trained on a suite of synthetic datasets simulating realistic clinical PHI/PII. For pixel data, we employ an uncertainty-aware Faster R-CNN model to localize embedded text, extract candidate PHI via Optical Character Recognition (OCR), and apply the NER pipeline for final redaction. Crucially, uncertainty quantification provides confidence measures for AI-based detections to enhance automation reliability and enable informed human-in-the-loop verification to manage residual risks. This uncertainty-aware deidentification framework achieves robust performance across benchmark datasets and regulatory standards, including DICOM, HIPAA, and TCIA compliance metrics. By combining scalable automation, uncertainty quantification, and rigorous quality assurance, our solution addresses critical challenges in medical data de-identification and supports the secure, ethical, and trustworthy release of imaging data for research.

The de-identification (deID) of protected health information (PHI) and personally identifiable information (PII) is a fundamental requirement for sharing medical images, particularly through public repositories, to ensure compliance with patient privacy laws. In addition, preservation of non-PHI metadata to inform and enable downstream development of imaging artificial intelligence (AI) is an important consideration in biomedical research. The goal of MIDI-B was to provide a standardized platform for benchmarking of DICOM image deID tools based on a set of rules conformant to the HIPAA Safe Harbor regulation, the DICOM Attribute Confidentiality Profiles, and best practices in preservation of research-critical metadata, as defined by The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). The challenge employed a large, diverse, multi-center, and multi-modality set of real de-identified radiology images with synthetic PHI/PII inserted. The MIDI-B Challenge consisted of three phases: training, validation, and test. Eighty individuals registered for the challenge. In the training phase, we encouraged participants to tune their algorithms using their in-house or public data. The validation and test phases utilized the DICOM images containing synthetic identifiers (of 216 and 322 subjects, respectively). Ten teams successfully completed the test phase of the challenge. To measure success of a rule-based approach to image deID, scores were computed as the percentage of correct actions from the total number of required actions. The scores ranged from 97.91% to 99.93%. Participants employed a variety of open-source and proprietary tools with customized configurations, large language models, and optical character recognition (OCR). In this paper we provide a comprehensive report on the MIDI-B Challenge's design, implementation, results, and lessons learned.

Knee injuries frequently require Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) evaluation, increasing radiologists' workload. This study evaluates the impact of a Knee AI assistant on radiologists' diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in detecting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), meniscus, cartilage, and medial collateral ligament (MCL) lesions on knee MRI exams. This retrospective reader study was conducted from January 2024 to April 2024. Knee MRI studies were evaluated with and without AI assistance by six radiologists with between 2 and 10 years of experience in musculoskeletal imaging in two sessions, 1 month apart. The AI algorithm was trained on 23,074 MRI studies separate from the study dataset and tested on various knee structures, including ACL, MCL, menisci, and cartilage. The reference standard was established by the consensus of three expert MSK radiologists. Statistical analysis included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and Fleiss' Kappa. The study dataset involved 165 knee MRIs (89 males, 76 females; mean age, 42.3 ± 15.7 years). AI assistance improved sensitivity from 81% (134/165, 95% CI = [79.7, 83.3]) to 86%(142/165, 95% CI = [84.2, 87.5]) (p < 0.001), accuracy from 86% (142/165, 95% CI = [85.4, 86.9]) to 91%(150/165, 95% CI = [90.7, 92.1]) (p < 0.001), and specificity from 88% (145/165, 95% CI = [87.1, 88.5]) to 93% (153/165, 95% CI = [92.7, 93.8]) (p < 0.001). Sensitivity and accuracy improvements were observed across all knee structures with varied statistical significance ranging from < 0.001 to 0.28. The Fleiss' Kappa values among readers increased from 54% (95% CI = [53.0, 55.3]) to 78% (95% CI = [76.6, 79.0]) (p < 0.001) post-AI integration. The integration of AI improved diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and inter-reader agreement in knee MRI interpretation, highlighting the value of this approach in clinical practice. Question Can artificial intelligence (AI) assistance improve the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of radiologists in detecting main lesions anterior cruciate ligament, meniscus, cartilage, and medial collateral ligament lesions in knee MRI? Findings AI assistance in knee MRI interpretation increased radiologists' sensitivity from 81 to 86% and accuracy from 86 to 91% for detecting knee lesions while improving inter-reader agreement (p < 0.001). Clinical relevance AI-assisted knee MRI interpretation enhances diagnostic precision and consistency among radiologists, potentially leading to more accurate injury detection, improved patient outcomes, and reduced diagnostic variability in musculoskeletal imaging.

The advent of anti-amyloid therapies (AATs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has elevated the importance of MRI surveillance for amyloidrelated imaging abnormalities (ARIA) such as microhemorrhages and siderosis (ARIA-H) and edema (ARIA-E). We report a literature review and early quality assurance experience with an FDA-cleared assistive AI tool intended for detection of ARIA in MRI clinical workflows. The AI system improved sensitivity for detection of subtle ARIA-E and ARIA-H lesions but at the cost of a reduction in specificity. We propose a tiered workflow combining protocol harmonization and expert interpretation with AI overlay review. AI-assisted ARIA detection is a paradigm shift that offers great promise to enhance patient safety as disease-modifying therapies for AD gain broader clinical use; however, some pitfalls need to be considered.ABBREVIATIONS: AAT＝ anti-amyloid therapy; ARIA＝ amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, ARIA-H = amyloid-related imaging abnormality-hemorrhage, ARIA-E = amyloid-related imaging abnormality-edema.

Large vessel occlusion (LVO) accounts for a third of all ischemic strokes. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown good accuracy in identifying LVOs on computed tomography angiograms (CTA). We sought to analyze whether AI-adjudicated CTA improves workflow times and clinical outcomes in patients with confirmed LVOs. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies comparing initial radiological assessment assisted by AI softwares versus standard assessment of patients with acute LVO strokes. Results were pooled using a random-effects model as mean differences for continuous outcomes or odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes, along with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We included 9 studies comprising 1,270 patients, of whom 671 (52.8%) had AI-assisted radiological assessment. AI consistently improved treatment times when compared to standard assessment, as evidenced by a mean reduction of 20.55 minutes in door-to-groin time (95% CI -36.69 to -4.42 minutes; p<0.01) and a reduction of 14.99 minutes in CTA to reperfusion (95% CI -28.45 to -1.53 minutes; p=0.03). Functional independence, defined as a modified Rankin scale 0-2, occurred at similar rates in the AI-supported group and with the standard workflow (OR 1.27; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.76; p=0.14), as did mortality (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.27 to 1.88; p=0.49). The incorporation of AI softwares for LVO detection in acute ischemic stroke enhanced workflow efficiency and was associated with decreased time to treatment. However, AI did not improve clinical outcomes as compared with standard assessment.

Recent prospective studies have shown that AI may be integrated in double-reader settings to increase cancer detection. The ScreenTrustCAD study was conducted at the breast radiology department at the Capio S:t Göran Hospital where AI is now implemented in clinical practice. This study reports on how the hospital prepared by exploring risks from an enterprise risk management perspective, i.e., applying a holistic and proactive perspective, and developed risk mitigation actions. The study was conducted as an integral part of the preparations before implementing AI in a breast imaging department. Collaborative ideation sessions were conducted with personnel at the hospital, either directly or indirectly involved with AI, to identify risks. Two external experts with competencies in cybersecurity, machine learning, and the ethical aspects of AI, were interviewed as a complement. The risks identified were analyzed according to an Enterprise Risk Management framework, adopted for healthcare, that assumes risks to be emerging from eight different domains. Finally, appropriate risk mitigation actions were identified and discussed. Twenty-three risks were identified covering seven of eight risk domains, in turn generating 51 suggested risk mitigation actions. Not only does the study indicate the emergence of patient safety risks, but it also shows that there are operational, strategic, financial, human capital, legal, and technological risks. The risks with most suggested mitigation actions were ‘Radiographers unable to answer difficult questions from patients’, ‘Increased risk that patient-reported symptoms are missed by the single radiologist’, ‘Increased pressure on the single reader knowing they are the only radiologist to catch a mistake by AI’, and ‘The performance of the AI algorithm might deteriorate’. Before a clinical integration of AI, hospitals should expand, identify, and address risks beyond immediate patient safety by applying comprehensive and proactive risk management. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-025-13176-9.