Breast cancer poses a serious threat to women's health, and its early detection is crucial for enhancing patient survival rates. While deep learning has significantly advanced mammographic image analysis, existing methods struggle to balance between view consistency with input adaptability. Furthermore, current models face challenges in accurately capturing multi-scale features, especially when subtle lesion variations across different scales are involved. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a Hybrid View Learning (HVL) paradigm that unifies traditional Single-View and Multi-View Learning approaches. The core component of this paradigm, our Attention-based Hybrid View Learning (AHVL) framework, incorporates two essential attention mechanisms: Contrastive Switch Attention (CSA) and Selective Pooling Attention (SPA). The CSA mechanism flexibly alternates between self-attention and cross-attention based on data integrity, integrating a pre-trained language model for contrastive learning to enhance model stability. Meanwhile, the SPA module employs multi-scale feature pooling and selection to capture critical features from mammographic images, overcoming the limitations of traditional models that struggle with fine-grained lesion detection. Experimental validation on the INbreast and CBIS-DDSM datasets shows that the AHVL framework outperforms both single-view and multi-view methods, especially under extreme view missing conditions. Even with an 80% missing rate on both datasets, AHVL maintains the highest accuracy and experiences the smallest performance decline in metrics like F1 score and AUC-PR, demonstrating its robustness and stability. This study redefines mammographic image analysis by leveraging attention-based hybrid view processing, setting a new standard for precise and efficient breast cancer diagnosis.

Artificial intelligence (AI) utilization is growing, but patient perceptions of AI are unclear. Our objective was to understand patient perceptions of AI through a multi-site survey of breast imaging patients. A 36-question survey was distributed to eight US practices (6 academic, 2 non-academic) from October 2023 through October 2024. This manuscript analyzes a subset of questions from the survey addressing digital health literacy and attitudes towards AI in medicine and breast imaging specifically. Multivariable analysis compared responses by respondent demographics. A total of 3,532 surveys were collected (response rate: 69.9%, 3,532/5053). Median respondent age was 55 years (IQR 20). Most respondents were White (73.0%, 2579/3532) and had completed college (77.3%, 2732/3532). Overall, respondents were undecided (range: 43.2%-50.8%) regarding questions about general perceptions of AI in healthcare. Respondents with higher electronic health literacy, more education, and younger age were significantly more likely to consider it useful to use utilize AI for aiding medical tasks (all p<0.001). In contrast, respondents with lower electronic health literacy and less education were significantly more likely to indicate it was a bad idea for AI to perform medical tasks (p<0.001). Non-White patients were more likely to express concerns that AI will not work as well for some groups compared to others (p<0.05). Overall, favorable opinions of AI use for medical tasks were associated with younger age, more education, and higher electronic health literacy. As AI is increasingly implemented into clinical workflows, it is important to educate patients and provide transparency to build patient understanding and trust.

Interval breast cancers (IBCs) are detected between regular mammographic screenings after an initially negative result. Studies have shown that the prognosis of IBCs is similar to that of unscreened symptomatic cancers and is hence a surrogate used to assess the effectiveness of screening programs. This systematic review consolidates the current literature available on strategies to reduce the rates of IBC. Following PRISMA guidelines, three databases were searched from inception till October 29, 2023 to identify papers, which reported IBC rates. Key search terms included "interval breast cancer", "mammogram", "tomosynthesis" and "screening". A total of 32 articles were included. Fourteen studies discussed the use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as an alternative screening modality to mammograms. Six studies discussed the use of artificial intelligence (AI) on mammograms, five studies discussed the use of supplemental modalities including ultrasonography (US) in addition to mammograms, five studies discussed varying screening intervals and two studies discussed tamoxifen use. The trajectory of IBCs can be altered by early detection when they are more amenable to treatment, through advanced screening techniques, adjusting inter-screening intervals and modifiable risk factors. The goal is to create a screening protocol that is economically effective and accessible to various populations.

This study evaluates the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) assistance on the diagnostic performance of radiologists with varying levels of experience in interpreting mammograms in a Malaysian tertiary referral center, particularly in women with dense breasts. A retrospective study including 434 digital mammograms interpreted by two general radiologists (12 and 6 years of experience) and two trainees (2 years of experience). Diagnostic performance was assessed with and without AI assistance (Lunit INSIGHT MMG), using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Inter-reader agreement was measured using kappa statistics. AI assistance significantly improved the diagnostic performance of all reader groups across all metrics (p < 0.05). The senior radiologist consistently achieved the highest sensitivity (86.5% without AI, 88.0% with AI) and specificity (60.5% without AI, 59.2% with AI). The junior radiologist demonstrated the highest PPV (56.9% without AI, 74.6% with AI) and NPV (90.3% without AI, 92.2% with AI). The trainees showed the lowest performance, but AI significantly enhanced their accuracy. AI assistance was particularly beneficial in interpreting mammograms of women with dense breasts. AI assistance significantly enhances the diagnostic accuracy and consistency of radiologists in mammogram interpretation, with notable benefits for less experienced readers. These findings support the integration of AI into clinical practice, particularly in resource-limited settings where access to specialized breast radiologists is constrained.

Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise in clinical tasks, yet its integration into workflows remains underexplored. This study proposes an AI-aided same-day diagnostic imaging workup to reduce recall rates following abnormal screening mammograms and alleviate patient anxiety while waiting for the diagnostic examinations. Using discrete simulation, we found minimal disruption to the workflow (a 4% reduction in daily patient volume or a 2% increase in operating time) under specific conditions: operation from 9 am to 12 pm with all radiologists managing all patient types (screenings, diagnostics, and biopsies). Costs specific to the AI-aided same-day diagnostic workup include AI software expenses and potential losses from unused pre-reserved slots for same-day diagnostic workups. These simulation findings can inform the implementation of an AI-aided same-day diagnostic workup, with future research focusing on its potential benefits, including improved patient satisfaction, reduced anxiety, lower recall rates, and shorter time to cancer diagnoses and treatment.