The automatic diagnosis of chest diseases is a popular and challenging task. Most current methods are based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which focus on local features while neglecting global features. Recently, self-attention mechanisms have been introduced into the field of computer vision, demonstrating superior performance. Therefore, this paper proposes an effective model, CheX-DS, for classifying long-tail multi-label data in the medical field of chest X-rays. The model is based on the excellent CNN model DenseNet for medical imaging and the newly popular Swin Transformer model, utilizing ensemble deep learning techniques to combine the two models and leverage the advantages of both CNNs and Transformers. The loss function of CheX-DS combines weighted binary cross-entropy loss with asymmetric loss, effectively addressing the issue of data imbalance. The NIH ChestX-ray14 dataset is selected to evaluate the model's effectiveness. The model outperforms previous studies with an excellent average AUC score of 83.76\%, demonstrating its superior performance.

To evaluate how different test set sampling strategies-random selection and balanced sampling-affect the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models in pediatric wrist fracture detection using radiographs, aiming to highlight the need for standardization in test set design. This retrospective study utilized the open-sourced GRAZPEDWRI-DX dataset of 6091 pediatric wrist radiographs. Two test sets, each containing 4588 images, were constructed: one using a balanced approach based on case difficulty, projection type, and fracture presence and the other a random selection. EfficientNet and YOLOv11 models were trained and validated on 18,762 radiographs and tested on both sets. Binary classification and object detection tasks were evaluated using metrics such as precision, recall, F1 score, AP50, and AP50-95. Statistical comparisons between test sets were performed using nonparametric tests. Performance metrics significantly decreased in the balanced test set with more challenging cases. For example, the precision for YOLOv11 models decreased from 0.95 in the random set to 0.83 in the balanced set. Similar trends were observed for recall, accuracy, and F1 score, indicating that models trained on easy-to-recognize cases performed poorly on more complex ones. These results were consistent across all model variants tested. AI models for pediatric wrist fracture detection exhibit reduced performance when tested on balanced datasets containing more difficult cases, compared to randomly selected cases. This highlights the importance of constructing representative and standardized test sets that account for clinical complexity to ensure robust AI performance in real-world settings. Question Do different sampling strategies based on samples' complexity have an influence in deep learning models' performance in fracture detection? Findings AI performance in pediatric wrist fracture detection significantly drops when tested on balanced datasets with more challenging cases, compared to randomly selected cases. Clinical relevance Without standardized and validated test datasets for AI that reflect clinical complexities, performance metrics may be overestimated, limiting the utility of AI in real-world settings.

Foundation models, pretrained on extensive datasets, have significantly advanced machine learning by providing robust and transferable embeddings applicable to various domains, including medical imaging diagnostics. This study evaluates the utility of embeddings derived from both general-purpose and medical domain-specific foundation models for training lightweight adapter models in multi-class radiography classification, focusing specifically on tube placement assessment. A dataset comprising 8842 radiographs classified into seven distinct categories was employed to extract embeddings using six foundation models: DenseNet121, BiomedCLIP, Med-Flamingo, MedImageInsight, Rad-DINO, and CXR-Foundation. Adapter models were subsequently trained using classical machine learning algorithms. Among these combinations, MedImageInsight embeddings paired with an support vector machine adapter yielded the highest mean area under the curve (mAUC) at 93.8%, followed closely by Rad-DINO (91.1%) and CXR-Foundation (89.0%). In comparison, BiomedCLIP and DenseNet121 exhibited moderate performance with mAUC scores of 83.0% and 81.8%, respectively, whereas Med-Flamingo delivered the lowest performance at 75.1%. Notably, most adapter models demonstrated computational efficiency, achieving training within one minute and inference within seconds on CPU, underscoring their practicality for clinical applications. Furthermore, fairness analyses on adapters trained on MedImageInsight-derived embeddings indicated minimal disparities, with gender differences in performance within 2% and standard deviations across age groups not exceeding 3%. These findings confirm that foundation model embeddings-especially those from MedImageInsight-facilitate accurate, computationally efficient, and equitable diagnostic classification using lightweight adapters for radiographic image analysis.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed medical diagnostics by enhancing the accuracy of disease detection, particularly through deep learning models to analyze medical imaging data. However, the energy demands of training these models, such as ResNet and MobileNet, are substantial and often overlooked; however, researchers mainly focus on improving model accuracy. This study compares the energy use of these two models for classifying thoracic diseases using the well-known CheXpert dataset. We calculate power and energy consumption during training using the EnergyEfficientAI library. Results demonstrate that MobileNet outperforms ResNet by consuming less power and completing training faster, resulting in lower overall energy costs. This study highlights the importance of prioritizing energy efficiency in AI model development, promoting sustainable, eco-friendly approaches to advance medical diagnosis.

We introduce CheXGenBench, a rigorous and multifaceted evaluation framework for synthetic chest radiograph generation that simultaneously assesses fidelity, privacy risks, and clinical utility across state-of-the-art text-to-image generative models. Despite rapid advancements in generative AI for real-world imagery, medical domain evaluations have been hindered by methodological inconsistencies, outdated architectural comparisons, and disconnected assessment criteria that rarely address the practical clinical value of synthetic samples. CheXGenBench overcomes these limitations through standardised data partitioning and a unified evaluation protocol comprising over 20 quantitative metrics that systematically analyse generation quality, potential privacy vulnerabilities, and downstream clinical applicability across 11 leading text-to-image architectures. Our results reveal critical inefficiencies in the existing evaluation protocols, particularly in assessing generative fidelity, leading to inconsistent and uninformative comparisons. Our framework establishes a standardised benchmark for the medical AI community, enabling objective and reproducible comparisons while facilitating seamless integration of both existing and future generative models. Additionally, we release a high-quality, synthetic dataset, SynthCheX-75K, comprising 75K radiographs generated by the top-performing model (Sana 0.6B) in our benchmark to support further research in this critical domain. Through CheXGenBench, we establish a new state-of-the-art and release our framework, models, and SynthCheX-75K dataset at https://raman1121.github.io/CheXGenBench/

Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms can provide rapid and precise radiographic bone age (BA) assessment. This study assessed the effects of an AI algorithm on the BA assessment performance of radiologists, and evaluated how automation bias could affect radiologists. In this prospective randomized crossover study, six radiologists with varying levels of experience (senior, mi-level, and junior) assessed cases from a test set of 200 standard BA radiographs. The test set was equally divided into two subsets: datasets A and B. Each radiologist assessed BA independently without AI assistance (A- B-) and with AI assistance (A+ B+). We used the mean of assessments made by two experts as the ground truth for accuracy assessment; subsequently, we calculated the mean absolute difference (MAD) between the radiologists' BA predictions and ground-truth BA and evaluated the proportion of estimates for which the MAD exceeded one year. Additionally, we compared the radiologists' performance under conditions of early AI assistance with their performance under conditions of delayed AI assistance; the radiologists were allowed to reject AI interpretations. The overall accuracy of senior, mid-level, and junior radiologists improved significantly with AI assistance than without AI assistance (MAD: 0.74 vs. 0.46 years, p < 0.001; proportion of assessments for which MAD exceeded 1 year: 24.0% vs. 8.4%, p < 0.001). The proportion of improved BA predictions with AI assistance (16.8%) was significantly higher than that of less accurate predictions with AI assistance (2.3%; p < 0.001). No consistent timing effect was observed between conditions of early and delayed AI assistance. Most disagreements between radiologists and AI occurred over images for patients aged ≤8 years. Senior radiologists had more disagreements than other radiologists. The AI algorithm improved the BA assessment accuracy of radiologists with varying experience levels. Automation bias was prone to affect less experienced radiologists.

Deep learning models have shown promise in lung pathology detection from chest X-rays, but widespread clinical adoption remains limited due to opaque model decision-making. In prior work, we introduced ClinicXAI, a human-centric, expert-guided concept bottleneck model (CBM) designed for interpretable lung cancer diagnosis. We now extend that approach and present XpertXAI, a generalizable expert-driven model that preserves human-interpretable clinical concepts while scaling to detect multiple lung pathologies. Using a high-performing InceptionV3-based classifier and a public dataset of chest X-rays with radiology reports, we compare XpertXAI against leading post-hoc explainability methods and an unsupervised CBM, XCBs. We assess explanations through comparison with expert radiologist annotations and medical ground truth. Although XpertXAI is trained for multiple pathologies, our expert validation focuses on lung cancer. We find that existing techniques frequently fail to produce clinically meaningful explanations, omitting key diagnostic features and disagreeing with radiologist judgments. XpertXAI not only outperforms these baselines in predictive accuracy but also delivers concept-level explanations that better align with expert reasoning. While our focus remains on explainability in lung cancer detection, this work illustrates how human-centric model design can be effectively extended to broader diagnostic contexts - offering a scalable path toward clinically meaningful explainable AI in medical diagnostics.

Osteoporosis screening should be systematic in the group of over 50-year-old females with a radius fracture. We tested a phantom combined with machine learning model and studied osteoporosis-related variables. This machine learning model for screening osteoporosis using plain radiographs requires further investigation in larger cohorts to assess its potential as a replacement for DXA measurements in settings where DXA is not available. The main purpose of this study was to improve osteoporosis screening, especially in post-menopausal patients with fragility wrist fractures. The secondary objective was to increase understanding of the connection between osteoporosis and aging, as well as other risk factors. We collected data on 83 females > 50 years old with a distal radius fracture treated at Oulu University Hospital in 2019-2020. The data included basic patient information, WHO FRAX tool, blood tests, X-ray imaging of the fractured wrist, and DXA scanning of the non-fractured forearm, both hips, and the lumbar spine. Machine learning was used in combination with a custom phantom. Eighty-five percent of the study population had osteopenia or osteoporosis. Only 28.4% of patients had increased bone resorption activity measured by ICTP values. Total radius BMD correlated with other osteoporosis-related variables (age r =  - 0.494, BMI r = 0.273, FRAX osteoporotic fracture risk r =  - 0.419, FRAX hip fracture risk r =  - 0.433, hip BMD r = 0.435, and lumbar spine BMD r = 0.645), but the ultra distal (UD) radius BMD did not. Our custom phantom combined with a machine learning model showed potential for screening osteoporosis, with the class-wise accuracies for "Osteoporotic vs. osteopenic & normal bone" of 76% and 75%, respectively. We suggest osteoporosis screening for all females over 50 years old with wrist fractures. We found that the total radius BMD correlates with the central BMD. Due to the limited sample size in the phantom and machine learning parts of the study, further research is needed to make a clinically useful tool for screening osteoporosis.

Bone fracture risk assessment for osteoporotic patients is essential for implementing early countermeasures and preventing discomfort and hospitalization. Current methodologies, such as Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), provide a risk assessment over a 5- to 10-year period rather than evaluating the bone's current health status. The database was collected by Ajou University Medical Center from 2017 to 2021. It included 9,260 patients, aged 55 to 99, comprising 242 femur fracture (FX) cases and 9,018 non-fracture (NFX) cases. To model the association of the bone's current health status with prevalent FXs, three prediction algorithms-extreme gradient boosting (XGB), support vector machine, and multilayer perceptron-were trained using two-dimensional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (2D-DXA) analysis results and subsequently benchmarked. The XGB classifier, which proved most effective, was then further refined using synthetic data generated by the adaptive synthetic oversampler to balance the FX and NFX classes and enhance boundary sharpness for better classification accuracy. The XGB model trained on raw data demonstrated good prediction capabilities, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78 and an F1 score of 0.71 on test cases. The inclusion of synthetic data improved classification accuracy in terms of both specificity and sensitivity, resulting in an AUC of 0.99 and an F1 score of 0.98. The proposed methodology demonstrates that current bone health can be assessed through post-processed results from 2D-DXA analysis. Moreover, it was also shown that synthetic data can help stabilize uneven databases by balancing majority and minority classes, thereby significantly improving classification performance.

Inhalation injuries present a challenge in clinical diagnosis and grading due to Conventional grading methods such as the Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) being subjective and lacking robust correlation with clinical parameters like mechanical ventilation duration and patient mortality. This study introduces a novel deep learning-based diagnosis assistant tool for grading inhalation injuries using bronchoscopy images to overcome subjective variability and enhance consistency in severity assessment. Our approach leverages data augmentation techniques, including graphic transformations, Contrastive Unpaired Translation (CUT), and CycleGAN, to address the scarcity of medical imaging data. We evaluate the classification performance of two deep learning models, GoogLeNet and Vision Transformer (ViT), across a dataset significantly expanded through these augmentation methods. The results demonstrate GoogLeNet combined with CUT as the most effective configuration for grading inhalation injuries through bronchoscopy images and achieves a classification accuracy of 97.8%. The histograms and frequency analysis evaluations reveal variations caused by the augmentation CUT with distribution changes in the histogram and texture details of the frequency spectrum. PCA visualizations underscore the CUT substantially enhances class separability in the feature space. Moreover, Grad-CAM analyses provide insight into the decision-making process; mean intensity for CUT heatmaps is 119.6, which significantly exceeds 98.8 of the original datasets. Our proposed tool leverages mechanical ventilation periods as a novel grading standard, providing comprehensive diagnostic support.