Side-to-side differences in hip bone mineral density in patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis.
Authors
Affiliations (5)
Affiliations (5)
- Department of Orthopaedic Medical Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan. Electronic address: [email protected].
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
- Department of Orthopaedics, Kyowakai hospital, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
- Division of Information Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara, Japan.
- Department of Orthopaedic Medical Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Abstract
Accurately evaluating bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA) is crucial for diagnosing osteoporosis and selecting implants for hip arthroplasty. Our goal was to measure the BMD differences between sides, examine contributing factors, and identify the optimal side for BMD assessment in these patients. We analyzed 108 women with unilateral hip OA. Bilateral hip BMD was assessed automatically through quantitative CT (QCT) utilizing a validated, deep-learning-based approach. We evaluated BMD variations between the OA and healthy hips across total, neck, and distal regions. To determine their contributions, we analyzed factors, including patient demographics, Crowe classification, Bombelli classification, knee OA status, hip functional score, and gluteal muscle volume and density. Furthermore, we examined how side-to-side BMD differences influenced osteoporosis diagnosis using T-scores based on QCT. The average BMD on the OA side was 6.9 % lower in the total region, 14.5 % higher in the neck region, and 9.4 % lower in the distal region than on the healthy side. Contributing factors to the reduced BMD in the OA hip included younger age, Bombelli classification (atrophic type), and significant gluteal muscle atrophy. Diagnoses from the OA side revealed lower sensitivity (61 %) than those from the healthy side (88 %). Analysis on one side alone yields a more precise osteoporosis diagnosis from the healthy side. Nonetheless, bilateral BMD assessment remains crucial, particularly in younger individuals and those with atrophic OA types. Although based on QCT, our findings support bilateral analysis by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for these patients.