Rate and Patient Specific Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Acetabular Fractures during Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty using a Pressfit Cup.

Authors

Simon S,Gobi H,Mitterer JA,Frank BJ,Huber S,Aichmair A,Dominkus M,Hofstaetter JG

Affiliations (5)

  • Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopedic Research, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria; AUVA Trauma Center Meidling, Kundratstr. 37, 1120, Vienna, Austria.
  • 2(nd) Department, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria.
  • Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopedic Research, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria.
  • Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopedic Research, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria; 2(nd) Department, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria.
  • 2(nd) Department, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria; School of Medicine, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Freudplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria.

Abstract

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a cementless acetabular component range from occult to severe fractures. The aims of this study were to evaluate the perioperative periprosthetic acetabular fracture rate and patient-specific risks of a modular cementless acetabular component. In this study, we included 7,016 primary THAs (61.4% women, 38.6% men; age, 67 years; interquartile-range, 58 to 74) that received a cementless-hydroxyapatite-coated modular-titanium press-fit acetabular component from a single manufacturer between January 2013 and September 2022. All perioperative radiographs and CT (computer tomography) scans were analyzed for all causes. Patient-specific data and the revision rate were retrieved, and radiographic measurements were performed using artificial intelligence-based software. Following matching based on patients' demographics, a comparison was made between patients who had and did not have periacetabular fractures in order to identify patient-specific and radiographic risk factors for periacetabular fractures. The fracture rate was 0.8% (56 of 7,016). Overall, 33.9% (19 of 56) were small occult fractures solely visible on CT. Additionally, there were 21 of 56 (37.5%) with a stable small fracture. Both groups (40 of 56 (71.4%)) were treated nonoperatively. Revision THA was necessary in 16 of 56, resulting in an overall revision rate of 0.2% (16 of 7,016). Patient-specific risk factors were small acetabular-component size (≤ 50), a low body mass index (BMI) (< 24.5), a higher age (> 68 years), women, a low lateral-central-age-angle (< 24°), a high Extrusion-index (> 20%), a high sharp-angle (> 38°), and a high Tönnis-angle (> 10°). A wide range of periprosthetic acetabular fractures were observed following primary cementless THA. In total, 71.4% of acetabular fractures were small cracks that did not necessitate revision surgery. By identifying patient-specific risk factors, such as advanced age, women, low BMI, and dysplastic hips, future complications may be reduced.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.