Rate and Patient Specific Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Acetabular Fractures during Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty using a Pressfit Cup.

Authors

Simon S,Gobi H,Mitterer JA,Frank BJ,Huber S,Aichmair A,Dominkus M,Hofstaetter JG

Affiliations (5)

  • Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopedic Research, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria; AUVA Trauma Center Meidling, Kundratstr. 37, 1120, Vienna, Austria.
  • 2(nd) Department, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria.
  • Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopedic Research, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria.
  • Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopedic Research, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria; 2(nd) Department, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria.
  • 2(nd) Department, Orthopedic Hospital Vienna Speising, Vienna, Austria; School of Medicine, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Freudplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria.

Abstract

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a cementless acetabular component range from occult to severe fractures. The aims of this study were to evaluate the perioperative periprosthetic acetabular fracture rate and patient-specific risks of a modular cementless acetabular component. In this study, we included 7,016 primary THAs (61.4% women, 38.6% men; age, 67 years; interquartile-range, 58 to 74) that received a cementless-hydroxyapatite-coated modular-titanium press-fit acetabular component from a single manufacturer between January 2013 and September 2022. All perioperative radiographs and CT (computer tomography) scans were analyzed for all causes. Patient-specific data and the revision rate were retrieved, and radiographic measurements were performed using artificial intelligence-based software. Following matching based on patients' demographics, a comparison was made between patients who had and did not have periacetabular fractures in order to identify patient-specific and radiographic risk factors for periacetabular fractures. The fracture rate was 0.8% (56 of 7,016). Overall, 33.9% (19 of 56) were small occult fractures solely visible on CT. Additionally, there were 21 of 56 (37.5%) with a stable small fracture. Both groups (40 of 56 (71.4%)) were treated nonoperatively. Revision THA was necessary in 16 of 56, resulting in an overall revision rate of 0.2% (16 of 7,016). Patient-specific risk factors were small acetabular-component size (≤ 50), a low body mass index (BMI) (< 24.5), a higher age (> 68 years), women, a low lateral-central-age-angle (< 24°), a high Extrusion-index (> 20%), a high sharp-angle (> 38°), and a high Tönnis-angle (> 10°). A wide range of periprosthetic acetabular fractures were observed following primary cementless THA. In total, 71.4% of acetabular fractures were small cracks that did not necessitate revision surgery. By identifying patient-specific risk factors, such as advanced age, women, low BMI, and dysplastic hips, future complications may be reduced.

Topics

Journal Article
Get Started

Upload your X-ray image and get interpretation.

Upload now →

Disclaimer: X-ray Interpreter's AI-generated results are for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult a healthcare professional for medical diagnosis and treatment.