Techniques are developed for generating uncertainty estimates for convolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods for registering the locations of lesions between the craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammographic X-ray image views. Multi-view lesion correspondence is an important task that clinicians perform for characterizing lesions during routine mammographic exams. Automated registration tools can aid in this task, yet if the tools also provide confidence estimates, they can be of greater value to clinicians, especially in cases involving dense tissue where lesions may be difficult to see. A set of deep ensemble-based techniques, which leverage a negative log-likelihood (NLL)-based cost function, are implemented for estimating uncertainties. The ensemble architectures involve significant modifications to an existing CNN dual-view lesion registration algorithm. Three architectural designs are evaluated, and different ensemble sizes are compared using various performance metrics. The techniques are tested on synthetic X-ray data, real 2D X-ray data, and slices from real 3D X-ray data. The ensembles generate covariance-based uncertainty ellipses that are correlated with registration accuracy, such that the ellipse sizes can give a clinician an indication of confidence in the mapping between the CC and MLO views. The results also show that the ellipse sizes can aid in improving computer-aided detection (CAD) results by matching CC/MLO lesion detects and reducing false alarms from both views, adding to clinical utility. The uncertainty estimation techniques show promise as a means for aiding clinicians in confidently establishing multi-view lesion correspondence, thereby improving diagnostic capability.

To establish a reliable machine learning model to predict malignancy in breast lesions identified by ultrasound (US) and optimize the negative predictive value to minimize unnecessary biopsies. We included clinical and ultrasonographic attributes from 1526 breast lesions classified as BI-RADS 3, 4a, 4b, 4c, 5, and 6 that underwent US-guided breast biopsy in four institutions. We selected the most informative attributes to train nine machine learning models, ensemble models and models with tuned threshold to make inferences about the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4a and 4b lesions (validation dataset). We tested the performance of the final model with 403 new suspicious lesions. The most informative attributes were shape, margin, orientation and size of the lesions, the resistance index of the internal vessel, the age of the patient and the presence of a palpable lump. The highest mean negative predictive value (NPV) was achieved with the K-Nearest Neighbors algorithm (97.9%). Making ensembles did not improve the performance. Tuning the threshold did improve the performance of the models and we chose the algorithm XGBoost with the tuned threshold as the final one. The tested performance of the final model was: NPV 98.1%, false negative 1.9%, positive predictive value 77.1%, false positive 22.9%. Applying this final model, we would have missed 2 of the 231 malignant lesions of the test dataset (0.8%). Machine learning can help physicians predict malignancy in suspicious breast lesions identified by the US. Our final model would be able to avoid 60.4% of the biopsies in benign lesions missing less than 1% of the cancer cases.

Background MRI protocols typically involve many imaging sequences and often require too much time. Purpose To simulate artificial intelligence (AI)-directed stratified scanning for screening breast MRI with various triage thresholds and evaluate its diagnostic performance against that of the full breast MRI protocol. Materials and Methods This retrospective reader study included consecutive contrast-enhanced screening breast MRI examinations performed between January 2013 and January 2019 at three regional cancer sites. In this simulation study, an in-house AI tool generated a suspicion score for subtraction maximum intensity projection images during a given MRI examination, and the score was used to determine whether to proceed with the full MRI protocol or end the examination early (abbreviated breast MRI [AB-MRI] protocol). Examinations with suspicion scores under the 50th percentile were read using both the AB-MRI protocol (ie, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI scans only) and the full MRI protocol. Diagnostic performance metrics for screening with various AI triage thresholds were compared with those for screening without AI triage. Results Of 863 women (mean age, 52 years ± 10 [SD]; 1423 MRI examinations), 51 received a cancer diagnosis within 12 months of screening. The diagnostic performance metrics for AI-directed stratified scanning that triaged 50% of examinations to AB-MRI versus full MRI protocol scanning were as follows: sensitivity, 88.2% (45 of 51; 95% CI: 79.4, 97.1) versus 86.3% (44 of 51; 95% CI: 76.8, 95.7); specificity, 80.8% (1108 of 1372; 95% CI: 78.7, 82.8) versus 81.4% (1117 of 1372; 95% CI: 79.4, 83.5); positive predictive value 3 (ie, percent of biopsies yielding cancer), 23.6% (43 of 182; 95% CI: 17.5, 29.8) versus 24.7% (42 of 170; 95% CI: 18.2, 31.2); cancer detection rate (per 1000 examinations), 31.6 (95% CI: 22.5, 40.7) versus 30.9 (95% CI: 21.9, 39.9); and interval cancer rate (per 1000 examinations), 4.2 (95% CI: 0.9, 7.6) versus 4.9 (95% CI: 1.3, 8.6). Specificity decreased by no more than 2.7 percentage points with AI triage. There were no AI-triaged examinations for which conducting the full MRI protocol would have resulted in additional cancer detection. Conclusion AI-directed stratified MRI decreased simulated scan times while maintaining diagnostic performance. © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Strand in this issue.

Ultrasonography plays an essential role in breast cancer diagnosis. Current deep learning based studies train the models on either images or videos in a centralized learning manner, lacking consideration of joint benefits between two different modality models or the privacy issue of data centralization. In this study, we propose the first decentralized learning solution for joint learning with breast ultrasound video and image, called FedBCD. To enable the model to learn from images and videos simultaneously and seamlessly in client-level local training, we propose a Joint Ultrasound Video and Image Learning (JUVIL) model to bridge the dimension gap between video and image data by incorporating temporal and spatial adapters. The parameter-efficient design of JUVIL with trainable adapters and frozen backbone further reduces the computational cost and communication burden of federated learning, finally improving the overall efficiency. Moreover, considering conventional model-wise aggregation may lead to unstable federated training due to different modalities, data capacities in different clients, and different functionalities across layers. We further propose a Fisher information matrix (FIM) guided Layer-wise Aggregation method named FILA. By measuring layer-wise sensitivity with FIM, FILA assigns higher contributions to the clients with lower sensitivity, improving personalized performance during federated training. Extensive experiments on three image clients and one video client demonstrate the benefits of joint learning architecture, especially for the ones with small-scale data. FedBCD significantly outperforms nine federated learning methods on both video-based and image-based diagnoses, demonstrating the superiority and potential for clinical practice. Code is released at https://github.com/tianpeng-deng/FedBCD.

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers affecting women worldwide. Early detection and treatment are crucial in significantly reducing mortality rates Microcalcifications (MCs) are of particular importance among the various breast lesions. These tiny calcium deposits within breast tissue are present in approximately 30% of malignant tumors and can serve as critical indirect indicators of early-stage breast cancer. Three or more MCs within an area of 1 cm² are considered a Microcalcification Cluster (MCC) and assigned a BI-RADS category 4, indicating a suspicion of malignancy. Mammography is the most used technique for breast cancer detection. Approximately one in two mammograms showing MCCs is confirmed as cancerous through biopsy. MCCs are challenging to detect, even for experienced radiologists, underscoring the need for computer-aided detection tools such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). CNNs require large amounts of domain-specific data with consistent resolutions for effective training. However, most publicly available mammogram datasets either lack resolution information or are compiled from heterogeneous sources. Additionally, MCCs are often either unlabeled or sparsely represented in these datasets, limiting their utility for training CNNs. In this dataset, we present the MEXBreast, an annotated MCCs Mexican digital mammogram database, containing images from resolutions of 50, 70, and 100 microns. MEXBreast aims to support the training, validation, and testing of deep learning CNNs.

The high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) images generated with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the screening of breast cancer offer new possibilities for early disease diagnosis. Early detection is especially important as the incidence of breast cancer increases. However, DBT also presents challenges in terms of poorer results for dense breasts, increased false positive rates, slightly higher radiation doses, and increased reading times. Deep learning (DL) has been shown to effectively increase the processing efficiency and diagnostic accuracy of DBT images. This article reviews the application and outlook of DL in DBT-based breast cancer screening. First, the fundamentals and challenges of DBT technology are introduced. The applications of DL in DBT are then grouped into three categories: diagnostic classification of breast diseases, lesion segmentation and detection, and medical image generation. Additionally, the current public databases for mammography are summarized in detail. Finally, this paper analyzes the main challenges in the application of DL techniques in DBT, such as the lack of public datasets and model training issues, and proposes possible directions for future research, including large language models, multisource domain transfer, and data augmentation, to encourage innovative applications of DL in medical imaging.

Detecting breast cancer early is of the utmost importance to effectively treat the millions of women afflicted by breast cancer worldwide every year. Although mammography is the primary imaging modality for screening breast cancer, there is an increasing interest in adding magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to screening programmes, particularly for women at high risk. Recent guidelines by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) recommended breast MRI as a supplemental screening tool for women with dense breast tissue. However, acquiring and reading MRI scans requires significantly more time from expert radiologists. This highlights the need to develop new automated methods to detect cancer accurately using MRI and Artificial Intelligence (AI), which have the potential to support radiologists in breast MRI interpretation and classification and help detect cancer earlier. For this reason, the ODELIA consortium has made this multi-centre dataset publicly available to assist in developing AI tools for the detection of breast cancer on MRI.

Breast cancer is a serious public health problem and is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. Early detection of the disease can significantly increase the chances of survival. However, manual analysis of mammogram mastery images is complex and time-consuming, which can lead to disagreements among experts. For this reason, automated diagnostic systems can play a significant role in increasing the accuracy and efficiency of diagnosis. In this study, we present an effective deep learning (DL) method, which classifies mammogram mastery images into cancer and noncancer categories using a collected dataset. Our model is pretrained based on the Inception V3 architecture. First, we run 5-fold cross-validation tests on the fully trained and fine-tuned Inception V3 model. Next, we apply a combined method based on likelihood and mean, where the fine-tuned Inception V3 model demonstrated superior performance in classification. Our DL model achieved 99% accuracy and 99% F1 score. In addition, interpretable AI techniques were used to enhance the transparency of the classification process. The finely tuned Inception V3 model demonstrated the highest performance in classification, confirming its effectiveness in automatic breast cancer detection. The experimental results clearly indicate that our proposed DL-based method for breast cancer image classification is highly effective, especially its application in image-based diagnostic methods. This study brings to the fore the huge potential of AI-based solutions, which can play a significant role in increasing the accuracy and reliability of breast cancer diagnosis.

Artificial intelligence (AI) in breast imaging has garnered significant attention given the numerous reports of improved efficiency, accuracy, and the potential to bridge the gap of expanded volume in the face of limited physician resources. While AI models are developed with specific data points, on specific equipment, and in specific populations, the real-world clinical environment is dynamic, and patient populations are diverse, which can impact generalizability and widespread adoption of AI in clinical practice. Implementation of AI models into clinical practice requires focused attention on the potential of AI bias impacting outcomes. The following review presents the concept, sources, and types of AI bias to be considered when implementing AI models and offers suggestions on strategies to mitigate AI bias in practice.

Mammographic breast cancer detection depends on high-quality positioning, which is traditionally assessed and monitored subjectively. This study used artificial intelligence (AI) to evaluate mammography positioning on digital screening mammograms to identify and quantify unmet mammography positioning quality (MPQ). Data were collected within an IRB-approved collaboration. In total, 126 367 digital mammography studies (553 339 images) were processed. Unmet MPQ criteria, including exaggeration, portion cutoff, posterior tissue missing, nipple not in profile, too high on image receptor, inadequate pectoralis length, sagging, and posterior nipple line (PNL) length difference, were evaluated using MPQ AI algorithms. The similarity of unmet MPQ occurrence and rank order was compared for each health system. Altogether, 163 759 and 219 785 unmet MPQ criteria were identified, respectively, at the health systems. The rank order and the probability distribution of the unmet MPQ criteria were not statistically significantly different between health systems (P = .844 and P = .92, respectively). The 3 most-common unmet MPQ criteria were: short PNL length on the craniocaudal (CC) view, inadequate pectoralis muscle, and excessive exaggeration on the CC view. The percentages of unmet positioning criteria out of the total potential unmet positioning criteria at health system 1 and health system 2 were 8.4% (163 759/1 949 922) and 7.3% (219 785/3 030 129), respectively. Artificial intelligence identified a similar distribution of unmet MPQ criteria in 2 health systems' daily work. Knowledge of current commonly unmet MPQ criteria can facilitate the improvement of mammography quality through tailored education strategies.