The aim of this study was to compare the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting distal radius fractures (DRFs) on plain radiographs with the performance of human raters. We retrospectively analysed all wrist radiographs taken in our hospital since the introduction of AI-guided fracture detection from 11 September 2023 to 10 September 2024. The ground truth was defined by the radiological report of a board-certified radiologist based solely on conventional radiographs. The following parameters were calculated: True Positives (TP), True Negatives (TN), False Positives (FP), and False Negatives (FN), accuracy (%), Cohen's Kappa coefficient, F1 score, sensitivity (%), specificity (%), Youden Index (J Statistic). In total 1145 plain radiographs of the wrist were taken between 11 September 2023 and 10 September 2024. The mean age of the included patients was 46.6 years (± 27.3), ranging from 2 to 99 years and 59.0% were female. According to the ground truth, of the 556 anteroposterior (AP) radiographs, 225 cases (40.5%) had a DRF, and of the 589 lateral view radiographs, 240 cases (40.7%) had a DRF. The AI system showed the following results on AP radiographs: accuracy (%): 95.90; Cohen's Kappa: 0.913; F1 score: 0.947; sensitivity (%): 92.02; specificity (%): 98.45; Youden Index: 90.47. The orthopedic surgeon achieved a sensitivity of 91.5%, specificity of 97.8%, an overall accuracy of 95.1%, F1 score of 0.943, and Cohen's kappa of 0.901. These results were comparable to those of the AI model. AI-guided detection of DRF demonstrated diagnostic performance nearly identical to that of an experienced orthopedic surgeon across all key metrics. The marginal differences observed in sensitivity and specificity suggest that AI can reliably support clinical fracture assessment based solely on conventional radiographs.

Imaging holds a pivotal yet contentious role in the early diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis. Although MRI has enhanced our ability to detect early inflammatory changes, particularly bone marrow oedema in the sacroiliac joints, the poor specificity of this finding introduces a substantial risk of overdiagnosis. The well intentioned push by rheumatologists towards earlier intervention could inadvertently lead to the misclassification of mechanical or degenerative conditions (eg, osteitis condensans ilii) as inflammatory disease, especially in the absence of structural lesions. Diagnostic uncertainty is further fuelled by anatomical variability, sex differences, and suboptimal imaging protocols. Current strategies-such as quantifying bone marrow oedema and analysing its distribution patterns, and integrating clinical and laboratory data-offer partial guidance for avoiding overdiagnosis but fall short of resolving the core diagnostic dilemma. Emerging imaging technologies, including high-resolution sequences, quantitative MRI, radiomics, and artificial intelligence, could improve diagnostic precision, but these tools remain exploratory. This Viewpoint underscores the need for a shift in imaging approaches, recognising that although timely diagnosis and treatment is essential to prevent long-term structural damage, robust and reliable imaging criteria are also needed. Without such advances, the imaging field risks repeating past missteps seen in other rheumatological conditions.

To evaluate how different test set sampling strategies-random selection and balanced sampling-affect the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models in pediatric wrist fracture detection using radiographs, aiming to highlight the need for standardization in test set design. This retrospective study utilized the open-sourced GRAZPEDWRI-DX dataset of 6091 pediatric wrist radiographs. Two test sets, each containing 4588 images, were constructed: one using a balanced approach based on case difficulty, projection type, and fracture presence and the other a random selection. EfficientNet and YOLOv11 models were trained and validated on 18,762 radiographs and tested on both sets. Binary classification and object detection tasks were evaluated using metrics such as precision, recall, F1 score, AP50, and AP50-95. Statistical comparisons between test sets were performed using nonparametric tests. Performance metrics significantly decreased in the balanced test set with more challenging cases. For example, the precision for YOLOv11 models decreased from 0.95 in the random set to 0.83 in the balanced set. Similar trends were observed for recall, accuracy, and F1 score, indicating that models trained on easy-to-recognize cases performed poorly on more complex ones. These results were consistent across all model variants tested. AI models for pediatric wrist fracture detection exhibit reduced performance when tested on balanced datasets containing more difficult cases, compared to randomly selected cases. This highlights the importance of constructing representative and standardized test sets that account for clinical complexity to ensure robust AI performance in real-world settings. Question Do different sampling strategies based on samples' complexity have an influence in deep learning models' performance in fracture detection? Findings AI performance in pediatric wrist fracture detection significantly drops when tested on balanced datasets with more challenging cases, compared to randomly selected cases. Clinical relevance Without standardized and validated test datasets for AI that reflect clinical complexities, performance metrics may be overestimated, limiting the utility of AI in real-world settings.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy, frequently presenting with pain, numbness, and muscle weakness due to median nerve compression. However, diagnosing CTS becomes particularly challenging in patients with Congenital Thenar Hypoplasia (CTH), a rare congenital anomaly characterized by underdeveloped thenar muscles. The overlapping symptoms of CTH and CTS, such as thumb weakness, impaired hand function, and thenar muscle atrophy, can obscure the identification of median nerve compression. This review highlights the diagnostic complexities arising from this overlap and evaluates existing clinical, imaging, and electrophysiological assessment methods. While traditional diagnostic tests, including Phalen's and Tinel's signs, exhibit limited sensitivity in CTH patients, advanced imaging modalities like ultrasonography (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provide valuable insights into structural abnormalities. Additionally, emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) enhance diagnostic precision by automating imaging analysis and identifying subtle nerve alterations. Combining clinical history, functional assessments, and advanced imaging, an interdisciplinary approach is critical to differentiate between CTH-related anomalies and CTS accurately. This comprehensive review underscores the need for tailored diagnostic protocols to improve early detection, personalised management, and outcomes for this unique patient population.

Wrong-level spine surgery remains a significant concern in spine surgery, leading to devastating consequences for patients and healthcare systems alike. This comprehensive review aims to analyze the existing literature on wrong-level spine surgery in spine procedures, identifying key factors that contribute to these errors and exploring advanced strategies and technologies designed to prevent them. A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and CINAHL. The selection criteria focused on preclinical and clinical studies that specifically addressed wrong site and wrong level surgeries in the context of spine surgery. The findings reveal a range of contributing factors to wrong-level spine surgeries, including communication failures, inadequate preoperative planning, and insufficient surgical protocols. The review emphasizes the critical role of innovative technologies-such as artificial intelligence, advanced imaging techniques, and surgical navigation systems-alongside established safety protocols like digital checklists and simulation training in enhancing surgical accuracy and preventing errors. In conclusion, integrating advanced technologies and systematic safety protocols is instrumental in reducing the incidence of wrong-level spine surgeries. This review underscores the importance of continuous education and the adoption of innovative solutions to foster a culture of safety and improve surgical outcomes. By addressing the multifaceted challenges associated with these errors, the field can work towards minimizing their occurrence and enhancing patient care.

Due to differences in subjective experience and professional level among doctors, as well as inconsistent diagnostic criteria, there are issues with the accuracy and reliability of single imaging diagnosis results for knee joint injuries. To address these issues, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) are adopted in this article for ensemble learning, and deep learning (DL) is combined for automatic analysis. By steps such as image enhancement, noise elimination, and tissue segmentation, the quality of image data is improved, and then convolutional neural networks (CNN) are used to automatically identify and classify injury types. The experimental results show that the DL model exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of different types of injuries, such as anterior cruciate ligament tear, meniscus injury, cartilage injury, and fracture. The diagnostic accuracy of anterior cruciate ligament tear exceeds 90%, and the highest diagnostic accuracy of cartilage injury reaches 95.80%. In addition, compared with traditional manual image interpretation, the DL model has significant advantages in time efficiency, with a significant reduction in average interpretation time per case. The diagnostic consistency experiment shows that the DL model has high consistency with doctors' diagnosis results, with an overall error rate of less than 2%. The model has high accuracy and strong generalization ability when dealing with different types of joint injuries. These data indicate that combining multiple imaging technologies and the DL algorithm can effectively improve the accuracy and efficiency of diagnosing sports injuries of knee joints.

Implantation of metallic instrumentation is the mainstay of a variety of orthopaedic and spine surgeries. Postoperatively, imaging of the soft tissues around these implants is commonly required to assess for persistent, recurrent, and/or new pathology (ie, instrumentation loosening, particle disease, infection, neural compression); visualization of these pathologies often requires the superior soft-tissue contrast of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). As susceptibility artifacts from ferromagnetic implants can result in unacceptable image quality, unique MRI approaches are often necessary to provide accurate imaging. In this text, a comprehensive review is provided on common artifacts encountered in orthopaedic MRI, including comparisons of artifacts from different metallic alloys and common nonpropriety/propriety MR metallic artifact reduction methods. The newest metal-artifact suppression imaging technology and future directions (ie, deep learning/artificial intelligence) in this important field will be considered.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of disability worldwide, with symptoms like joint pain, limited functionality, and decreased quality of life, potentially leading to deformity and irreversible damage. Chemical changes in joint tissues precede imaging alterations, making early diagnosis challenging for conventional methods like X-rays. Although Raman imaging provides detailed chemical information, it is time-consuming. This paper aims to achieve rapid osteoarthritis diagnosis and grading using a self-developed Raman imaging system combined with deep learning denoising and acceleration algorithms. Our self-developed aberration-corrected line-scanning confocal Raman imaging device acquires a line of Raman spectra (hundreds of points) per scan using a galvanometer or displacement stage, achieving spatial and spectral resolutions of 2 μm and 0.2 nm, respectively. Deep learning algorithms enhance the imaging speed by over 4 times through effective spectrum denoising and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvement. By leveraging the denoising capabilities of deep learning, we are able to acquire high-quality Raman spectral data with a reduced integration time, thereby accelerating the imaging process. Experiments on the tibial plateau of osteoarthritis patients compared three excitation wavelengths (532, 671, and 785 nm), with 671 nm chosen for optimal SNR and minimal fluorescence. Machine learning algorithms achieved a 98 % accuracy in distinguishing articular from calcified cartilage and a 97 % accuracy in differentiating osteoarthritis grades I to IV. Our fast Raman imaging system, combining an aberration-corrected line-scanning confocal Raman imager with deep learning denoising, offers improved imaging speed and enhanced spectral and spatial resolutions. It enables rapid, label-free detection of osteoarthritis severity and can identify early compositional changes before clinical imaging, allowing precise grading and tailored treatment, thus advancing orthopedic diagnostics and improving patient outcomes.

To assess the agreement between lumbar disc degeneration (DD) grading by the convolutional neural network model SpineNet and radiologist's visual grading. In a 14-year follow-up MRI study involving 19 male volunteers, lumbar DD was assessed by SpineNet and two radiologists using the Pfirrmann classification at baseline (age 37) and after 14 years (age 51). Pfirrmann summary scores (PSS) were calculated by summing individual disc grades. The agreement between the first radiologist and SpineNet was analyzed, with the second radiologist's grading used for inter-observer agreement. Significant differences were observed in the Pfirrmann grades and PSS assigned by the radiologist and SpineNet at both time points. SpineNet assigned Pfirrmann grade 1 to several discs and grade 5 to more discs compared to the radiologists. The concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) of PSS between the radiologist and SpineNet were 0.54 (95% CI: 0.28 to 0.79) at baseline and 0.54 (0.27 to 0.80) at follow-up. The average kappa (κ) values of 0.74 (0.68 to 0.81) at baseline and 0.68 (0.58 to 0.77) at follow-up. CCC of PSS between the radiologists was 0.83 (0.69 to 0.97) at baseline and 0.78 (0.61 to 0.95) at follow-up, with κ values ranging from 0.73 to 0.96. We found fair to substantial agreement in DD grading between SpineNet and the radiologist, albeit with notable discrepancies. These findings indicate that AI-based systems like SpineNet hold promise as complementary tools in radiological evaluation, including in longitudinal studies, but emphasize the need for ongoing refinement of AI algorithms.

The present study followed the reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We conducted this study to review the diagnostic value of artificial intelligence (AI) for various types of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and the level of stenosis, offering evidence-based support for the development of smart diagnostic tools. AI is currently being utilized for image processing in clinical practice. Some studies have explored AI techniques for identifying the severity of LSS in recent years. Nevertheless, there remains a shortage of structured data proving its effectiveness. Four databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science) were searched until March 2024, including original studies that utilized deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) models to diagnose LSS. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies is a quality evaluation tool for diagnostic research (diagnostic tests). Computed Tomography. PROSPERO is an international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews. Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic. Magnetic Resonance. Central canal stenosis. three-dimensional magnetic resonance myelography. The accuracy in the validation set was extracted for a meta-analysis. The meta-analysis was completed in R4.4.0. A total of 48 articles were included, with an overall accuracy of 0.885 (95% CI: 0.860-0907) for dichotomous tasks. Among them, the accuracy was 0.892 (95% CI: 0.867-0915) for DL and 0.833 (95% CI: 0.760-0895) for ML. The overall accuracy for LSS was 0.895 (95% CI: 0.858-0927), with an accuracy of 0.912 (95% CI: 0.873-0.944) for DL and 0.843 (95% CI: 0.766-0.907) for ML. The overall accuracy for central canal stenosis was 0.875 (95% CI: 0.821-0920), with an accuracy of 0.881 (95% CI: 0.829-0.925) for DL and 0.733 (95% CI: 0.541-0.877) for ML. The overall accuracy for neural foramen stenosis was 0.893 (95% CI: 0.851-0.928). In polytomous tasks, the accuracy was 0.936 (95% CI: 0.895-0.967) for no LSS, 0.503 (95% CI: 0.391-0.614) for mild LSS, 0.512 (95% CI: 0.336-0.688) for moderate LSS, and 0.860 for severe LSS (95% CI: 0.733-0.954). AI is highly valuable for diagnosing LSS. However, further external validation is necessary to enhance the analysis of different stenosis categories and improve the diagnostic accuracy for mild to moderate stenosis levels.