Patients with metastatic bone disease are at risk of pathological femoral fractures and may require prophylactic surgical fixation. Current clinical decision support tools often overestimate fracture risk, leading to overtreatment. While novel scores integrating femoral strength assessment via finite element (FE) models show promise, they require 3D imaging, extensive computation, and are difficult to automate. Predicting femoral strength directly from single 2D radiographic projections using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) could address these limitations, but this approach has not yet been explored for femora with metastatic lesions. This study aimed to test whether CNNs can accurately predict strength of femora with metastatic lesions from single 2D radiographic projections. CNNs with various architectures were developed and trained using an FE model generated training dataset. This training dataset was based on 36,000 modified computed tomography (CT) scans, created by randomly inserting artificial lytic lesions into the CT scans of 36 intact anatomical femoral specimens. From each modified CT scan, an anterior-posterior 2D projection was generated and femoral strength in one-legged stance was determined using nonlinear FE models. Following training, the CNN performance was evaluated on an independent experimental test dataset consisting of 31 anatomical femoral specimens (16 intact, 15 with artificial lytic lesions). 2D projections of each specimen were created from corresponding CT scans and femoral strength was assessed in mechanical tests. The CNNs' performance was evaluated using linear regression analysis and compared to 2D densitometric predictors (bone mineral density and content) and CT-based 3D FE models. All CNNs accurately predicted the experimentally measured strength in femora with and without metastatic lesions of the test dataset (R²≥0.80, CCC≥0.81). In femora with metastatic lesions, the performance of the CNNs (best: R²=0.84, CCC=0.86) was considerably superior to 2D densitometric predictors (R²≤0.07) and slightly inferior to 3D FE models (R²=0.90, CCC=0.94). CNNs, trained on a large dataset generated via FE models, predicted experimentally measured strength of femora with artificial metastatic lesions with accuracy comparable to 3D FE models. By eliminating the need for 3D imaging and reducing computational demands, this novel approach demonstrates potential for application in a clinical setting.

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly strained healthcare systems, highlighting the need for early diagnosis to isolate positive cases and prevent the spread. This study combines machine learning, deep learning, and transfer learning techniques to automatically diagnose COVID-19 and other pulmonary conditions from radiographic images. First, we used Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier on a dataset of 21,165 chest X-ray images. Our model achieved an accuracy of 86.18 %. This approach aids medical experts in rapidly and accurateky detecting lung diseases. Next, we applied transfer learning using ResNet18 combined with SVM on a dataset comprising normal, COVID-19, lung opacity, and viral pneumonia images. This model outperformed traditional methods, with classification rates of 98 % with Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), 97 % with Adam, 96 % with RMSProp, and 94 % with Adagrad optimizers. Additionally, we incorporated two additional transfer learning models, EfficientNet-CNN and Xception-CNN, which achieved classification accuracies of 99.20 % and 98.80 %, respectively. However, we observed limitations in dataset diversity and representativeness, which may affect model generalization. Future work will focus on implementing advanced data augmentation techniques and collaborations with medical experts to enhance model performance.This research demonstrates the potential of cutting-edge deep learning techniques to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in medical imaging applications.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been shown to enhance fracture-detection-accuracy, but the most effective AI-implementation in clinical practice is less well understood. In the current study, four approaches to AI-implementation are evaluated for their impact on AI-effectiveness. Retrospective single-center study based on all consecutive, around-the-clock radiographic examinations for suspected fractures, and accompanying clinical-practice radiologist-diagnoses, between January and March 2023. These image-sets were independently analysed by a dedicated bone-fracture-detection-AI. Findings were combined with radiologist clinical-practice diagnoses to simulate the four AI-implementation methods deemed most relevant to clinical workflows: AI-standalone (radiologist-findings not consulted); AI-problem-solving (AI-findings consulted when radiologist in doubt); AI-triage (radiologist-findings consulted when AI in doubt); and AI-safety net (AI-findings consulted when radiologist diagnosis negative). Reference-standard diagnoses were established by two senior musculoskeletal-radiologists (by consensus in cases of disagreement). Radiologist- and radiologist + AI diagnoses were compared for false negatives (FN), false positives (FP) and their clinical consequences. Experience-level-subgroups radiologists-in-training-, non-musculoskeletal-radiologists, and dedicated musculoskeletal-radiologists were analysed separately. 1508 image-sets were included (1227 unique patients; 40 radiologist-readers). Radiologist results were: 2.7 % FN (40/1508), 28 with clinical consequences; 1.2 % FP (18/1508), 2 received full-fracture treatments (11.1 %). All AI-implementation methods changed overall FN and FP with statistical significance (p < 0.001): AI-standalone 1.5 % FN (23/1508; 11 consequences), 6.8 % FP (103/1508); AI-problem-solving 3.2 % FN (48/1508; 31 consequences), 0.6 % FP (9/1508); AI-triage 2.1 % FN (32/1508; 18 consequences), 1.7 % FP (26/1508); AI-safety net 0.07 % FN (1/1508; 1 consequence), 7.6 % FP (115/1508). Subgroups show similar trends, except AI-triage increased FN for all subgroups except radiologists-in-training. Implementation methods have a large impact on AI-effectiveness. These results suggest AI should not be considered for problem-solving or triage at this time; AI standalone performs better than either and may be a source of assistance where radiologists are unavailable. Best results were obtained implementing AI as safety net, which eliminates missed fractures with serious clinical consequences; even though false positives are increased, unnecessary treatments are limited.

Silicosis, a debilitating occupational lung disease caused by inhaling crystalline silica, continues to be a significant global health issue, especially with the increasing use of engineered stone (ES) surfaces containing high silica content. Traditional diagnostic methods, dependent on radiological interpretation, have low sensitivity, especially, in the early stages of the disease, and present variability between evaluators. This study explores the efficacy of deep learning techniques in automating the screening and staging of silicosis using chest X-ray images. Utilizing a comprehensive dataset, obtained from the medical records of a cohort of workers exposed to artificial quartz conglomerates, we implemented a preprocessing stage for rib-cage segmentation, followed by classification using state-of-the-art deep learning models. The segmentation model exhibited high precision, ensuring accurate identification of thoracic structures. In the screening phase, our models achieved near-perfect accuracy, with ROC AUC values reaching 1.0, effectively distinguishing between healthy individuals and those with silicosis. The models demonstrated remarkable precision in the staging of the disease. Nevertheless, differentiating between simple silicosis and progressive massive fibrosis, the evolved and complicated form of the disease, presented certain difficulties, especially during the transitional period, when assessment can be significantly subjective. Notwithstanding these difficulties, the models achieved an accuracy of around 81% and ROC AUC scores nearing 0.93. This study highlights the potential of deep learning to generate clinical decision support tools to increase the accuracy and effectiveness in the diagnosis and staging of silicosis, whose early detection would allow the patient to be moved away from all sources of occupational exposure, therefore constituting a substantial advancement in occupational health diagnostics.

Identifying patients at risk of low bone mineral density (BMD) from X-rays presents an attractive approach to increase case finding. This paper showed the diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and robustness of a new technology: OsteoSight™. OsteoSight could increase diagnosis and preventive treatment rates for patients with low BMD. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and robustness of OsteoSight™, an automated image analysis tool designed to identify low bone mineral density (BMD) from routine hip and pelvic X-rays. Given the global rise in osteoporosis-related fractures and the limitations of current diagnostic paradigms, OsteoSight offers a scalable solution that integrates into existing clinical workflows. Performance of the technology was tested across three key areas: (1) diagnostic accuracy in identifying low BMD as compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the clinical gold standard; (2) reproducibility, through analysis of two images from the same patient; and (3) robustness, by evaluating the tool's performance across different patient demographics and X-ray scanner hardware. The diagnostic accuracy of OsteoSight for identifying patients at risk of low BMD was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.834 [0.789-0.880], with consistent results across subgroups of clinical confounders and X-ray scanner hardware. Specificity 0.852 [0.783-0.930] and sensitivity 0.628 [0.538-0.743] met pre-specified acceptance criteria. The pre-processing pipeline successfully excluded unsuitable cases including incorrect body parts, metalwork, and unacceptable femur positioning. The results demonstrate that OsteoSight is accurate in identifying patients with low BMD. This suggests its utility as an opportunistic assessment tool, especially in settings where DXA accessibility is limited or not recently performed. The tool's reproducibility and robust performance across various clinical confounders further supports its integration into routine orthopedic and medical practices, potentially broadening the reach of osteoporosis assessment and enabling earlier intervention for at-risk patients.

This research presents an innovative neuromorphic method utilizing Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) to analyze pediatric chest X-rays (PediCXR) to identify prevalent thoracic illnesses. We incorporate spiking-based machine learning models such as Spiking Convolutional Neural Networks (SCNN), Spiking Residual Networks (S-ResNet), and Hierarchical Spiking Neural Networks (HSNN), for pediatric chest radiographic analysis utilizing the publically available benchmark PediCXR dataset. These models employ spatiotemporal feature extraction, residual connections, and event-driven processing to improve diagnostic precision. The HSNN model surpasses benchmark approaches from the literature, with a classification accuracy of 96% across six thoracic illness categories, with an F1-score of 0.95 and a specificity of 1.0 in pneumonia detection. Our research demonstrates that neuromorphic computing is a feasible and biologically inspired approach to real-time medical imaging diagnostics, significantly improving performance.

The PRECISE framework, defined as Patient-Focused Radiology Reports with Enhanced Clarity and Informative Summaries for Effective Communication, leverages GPT-4 to create patient-friendly summaries of radiology reports at a sixth-grade reading level. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the PRECISE framework in improving the readability, reliability, and understandability of radiology reports. We hypothesized that the PRECISE framework improves the readability and patient understanding of radiology reports compared to the original versions. The PRECISE framework was assessed using 500 chest X-ray reports. Readability was evaluated using the Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog Index, and Automated Readability Index. Reliability was gauged by clinical volunteers, while understandability was assessed by non-medical volunteers. Statistical analyses including t-tests, regression analyses, and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to determine the significance of the differences in readability scores between the original and PRECISE-generated reports. Readability scores significantly improved, with the mean Flesch Reading Ease score increasing from 38.28 to 80.82 (p-value < 0.001), the Gunning Fog Index decreasing from 13.04 to 6.99 (p-value < 0.001), and the ARI score improving from 13.33 to 5.86 (p-value < 0.001). Clinical volunteer assessments found 95 % of the summaries reliable, and non-medical volunteers rated 97 % of the PRECISE-generated summaries as fully understandable. The application of the PRECISE approach demonstrates promise in enhancing patient understanding and communication without adding significant burden to radiologists. With improved reliability and patient-friendly summaries, this approach holds promise for fostering patient engagement and understanding in healthcare decision-making. The PRECISE framework represents a pivotal step towards more inclusive and patient-centric care delivery.

Osteopenia is a bone disorder that causes low bone density and affects millions of people worldwide. Diagnosis of this condition is commonly achieved through clinical assessment of bone mineral density (BMD). State of the art machine learning (ML) techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformer models, have gained increasing popularity in medicine. In this work, we employ six deep networks for osteopenia vs. healthy bone classification using X-ray imaging from the pediatric wrist dataset GRAZPEDWRI-DX. We apply two explainable AI techniques to analyze and interpret visual explanations for network decisions. Experimental results show that deep networks are able to effectively learn osteopenic and healthy bone features, achieving high classification accuracy rates. Among the six evaluated networks, DenseNet201 with transfer learning yielded the top classification accuracy at 95.2 %. Furthermore, visual explanations of CNN decisions provide valuable insight into the blackbox inner workings and present interpretable results. Our evaluation of deep network classification results highlights their capability to accurately differentiate between osteopenic and healthy bones in pediatric wrist X-rays. The combination of high classification accuracy and interpretable visual explanations underscores the promise of incorporating machine learning techniques into clinical workflows for the early and accurate diagnosis of osteopenia.

To demonstrate that a deep learning (DL) model can be employed as a teaching tool to improve radiologists' ability to perform a subsequent imaging task without additional artificial intelligence (AI) assistance at time of image interpretation. Three human readers were tasked to categorize 50 frontal knee radiographs by male and female sex before and after reviewing data derived from our DL model. The model's high accuracy in performing this task was revealed to the human subjects, who were also supplied the DL model's resultant occlusion interpretation maps ("heat maps") to serve as a teaching tool for study before final testing. Two weeks later, the three human readers performed the same task with a new set of 50 radiographs. The average accuracy of the three human readers was initially 0.59 (95%CI: 0.59-0.65), not statistically different than guessing given our sample skew. The DL model categorized sex with 0.96 accuracy. After study of AI-derived "heat maps" and associated radiographs, the average accuracy of the human readers, without the direct help of AI, on the new set of radiographs increased to 0.80 (95%CI: 0.73-0.86), a significant improvement (p=0.0270). AI-derived data can be used as a teaching tool to improve radiologists' own ability to perform an imaging task. This is an idea that we have not before seen advanced in the radiology literature. AI can be used as a teaching tool to improve the intrinsic accuracy of radiologists, even without the concurrent use of AI.

Hip fractures are a major orthopedic problem, especially in the elderly population. Hip fractures are usually diagnosed by clinical evaluation and imaging, especially X-rays. In recent years, new approaches to fracture detection have emerged with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning techniques in medical imaging. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ChatGPT-4o, an artificial intelligence model, in diagnosing hip fractures. A total of 200 anteroposterior pelvic X-ray images were retrospectively analyzed. Half of the images belonged to patients with surgically confirmed hip fractures, including both displaced and non-displaced types, while the other half represented patients with soft tissue trauma and no fractures. Each image was evaluated by ChatGPT-4o through a standardized prompt, and its predictions (fracture vs. no fracture) were compared against the gold standard diagnoses. Diagnostic performance metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Cohen's kappa, and F1 score were calculated. ChatGPT-4o demonstrated an overall accuracy of 82.5% in detecting hip fractures on pelvic radiographs, with a sensitivity of 78.0% and specificity of 87.0%. PPVs and NPVs were 85.7% and 79.8%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.825, indicating good discriminative performance. Among 22 false-negative cases, 68.2% were non-displaced fractures, suggesting the model had greater difficulty identifying subtle radiographic findings. Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.65, showing substantial agreement with actual diagnoses. Chi-square analysis revealed a strong correlation (χ² = 82.59, <i>P</i> < 0.001), while McNemar's test (<i>P</i> = 0.176) showed no significant asymmetry in error distribution. ChatGPT-4o shows promising accuracy in identifying hip fractures on pelvic X-rays, especially when fractures are displaced. However, its sensitivity drops significantly for non-displaced fractures, leading to many false negatives. This highlights the need for caution when interpreting negative AI results, particularly when clinical suspicion remains high. While not a replacement for expert assessment, ChatGPT-4o may assist in settings with limited specialist access.