Back to all papers

Automated echocardiographic measurements for longitudinal monitoring of ATTR cardiomyopathy: agreement and repeatability analysis

April 7, 2026medrxiv logopreprint

Authors

Walser, A.,Clerc, O. F.,Mork, C.,Flammer, A. J.,Myhre, P. L.,Schwotzer, R.,Graeni, C.,Ruschitzka, F.,Tanner, F. C.,Benz, D. C.

Affiliations (1)

  • University Hospital Zurich, Department of Cardiology, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

BackgroundDetection of disease progression is key to personalize treatment strategies in transthyretin cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), particularly with emerging therapies. Echocardiography can detect subtle longitudinal changes but is limited by operator dependence. This study evaluates agreement and reproducibility of fully automated, AI-assisted echocardiographic measurements under real-world conditions. MethodsThis retrospective study included 62 patients with ATTR-CM undergoing 178 serial annual echocardiograms assessed by a reference cardiologist, a second cardiologist, a novice reader, and a fully automated AI algorithm (Us2.ai). Interrater agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Intrarater variability for human readers was derived from repeated blinded measurements, with limits of agreement (LoA = mean difference +/- 1.96 x SD) defining the smallest detectable change. AI repeatability was assessed using within-study pairwise differences. ResultsAI showed moderate agreement with the reference cardiologist for IVSd and LVEDV (ICC 0.65 and 0.51), with biases of -1.9 mm and -39 mL, respectively. Interrater agreement between cardiologists was good (ICC 0.79 and 0.84) with minimal bias (-0.2 mm and +3 mL). Intrarater variability was moderate to excellent for both cardiologists (LoA 3.0 mm and 43 mL for the reference cardiologist; 2.7 mm and 31 mL for the second cardiologist). AI demonstrated comparable repeatability (LoA 3.6 mm and 37 mL), while the novice showed higher variability (5.1 mm and 61 mL). ConclusionAI-based measurements demonstrated repeatability comparable to experienced cardiologists. Despite moderate agreement and systematic differences in volumetric assessments, their reproducibility supports automated analysis for longitudinal echocardiographic monitoring.

Topics

cardiovascular medicine

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.