Back to all papers

Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Plaque Characterization: Clinical Implications, Evidence Gaps, and Future Directions.

January 22, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Benjanuwattra J,Castillo-Rodriguez C,Abdelnabi M,Ibrahim R,Nhat Pham H,Pathangey G,Allam M,Lee K,Tamarappoo B,Jokerst C,Ayoub C,Arsanjani R

Affiliations (6)

  • Division of Cardiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45219, USA.
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA.
  • Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
  • Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA.
  • Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide, with plaque composition and morphology being as key determinants of disease progression and clinical outcomes. Accurate plaque characterization is essential for risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making, yet conventional image interpretation is limited by inter-observer variability and time-intensive workflows. Artificial intelligence (AI) models have emerged as a transformative tool for automated coronary plaque analysis across multiple imaging modalities. AI-driven models demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for plaque detection, segmentation, quantification, and vulnerability assessment. Integration of AI-derived imaging biomarkers with clinical risk scores can further enhance prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events and supports personalized management. These advances position AI-enhanced imaging as a powerful adjunct for both invasive and non-invasive evaluation of CAD. Despite its promise, important barriers to widespread clinical adoption remain, including data heterogeneity, algorithmic bias, limited model transparency, insufficient prospective validation, regulatory challenges, and incomplete integration into clinical workflows. Addressing these challenges will be essential to ensure safe, generalizable, and cost-effective implementation of AI in routine cardiovascular care.

Topics

Journal ArticleReview

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 9,300+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.