RadGPT: A system based on a large language model that generates sets of patient-centered materials to explain radiology report information.
Authors
Affiliations (2)
Affiliations (2)
- Department of Radiology, Stanford Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
- Department of Radiology, Stanford Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, USA.
Abstract
The Cures Act Final Rule requires that patients have real-time access to their radiology reports, which contain technical language. Our objective to was to use a novel system called RadGPT, which integrates concept extraction and a large language model (LLM), to help patients understand their radiology reports. RadGPT generated 150 concept explanations and 390 question-and-answer pairs from 30 radiology report impressions from between 2012 and 2020. The extracted concepts were used to create concept-based explanations, as well as concept-based question-and-answer pairs where questions were generated using either a fixed template or an LLM. Additionally, report-based question-and-answer pairs were generated directly from the impression using an LLM without concept extraction. One board-certified radiologist and 4 radiology residents rated the material quality using a standardized rubric. Concept-based LLM-generated questions were significantly higher quality than concept-based template-generated questions (p < 0.001). Excluding those template-based question-and-answer pairs from further analysis, nearly all (> 95%) of RadGPT-generated materials were rated highly, with at least 50% receiving the highest possible ranking from all 5 raters. No answers or explanations were rated as likely to affect the safety or effectiveness of patient care. Report-level LLM-based questions and answers were rated particularly highly, with 92% of report-level LLM-based questions and 61% of the corresponding report-level answers receiving the highest rating from all raters. The educational tool RadGPT generated high-quality explanations and question-and-answer pairs that were personalized for each radiology report, unlikely to produce harmful explanations and likely to enhance patient understanding of radiology information.