Back to all papers

Ambiguity-aware Truncated Flow Matching for Ambiguous Medical Image Segmentation

November 10, 2025arxiv logopreprint

Authors

Fanding Li,Xiangyu Li,Xianghe Su,Xingyu Qiu,Suyu Dong,Wei Wang,Kuanquan Wang,Gongning Luo,Shuo Li

Affiliations (4)

  • Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
  • College of Computer and Control Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China
  • Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China
  • Department of Computer and Data Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States

Abstract

A simultaneous enhancement of accuracy and diversity of predictions remains a challenge in ambiguous medical image segmentation (AMIS) due to the inherent trade-offs. While truncated diffusion probabilistic models (TDPMs) hold strong potential with a paradigm optimization, existing TDPMs suffer from entangled accuracy and diversity of predictions with insufficient fidelity and plausibility. To address the aforementioned challenges, we propose Ambiguity-aware Truncated Flow Matching (ATFM), which introduces a novel inference paradigm and dedicated model components. Firstly, we propose Data-Hierarchical Inference, a redefinition of AMIS-specific inference paradigm, which enhances accuracy and diversity at data-distribution and data-sample level, respectively, for an effective disentanglement. Secondly, Gaussian Truncation Representation (GTR) is introduced to enhance both fidelity of predictions and reliability of truncation distribution, by explicitly modeling it as a Gaussian distribution at $T_{\text{trunc}}$ instead of using sampling-based approximations.Thirdly, Segmentation Flow Matching (SFM) is proposed to enhance the plausibility of diverse predictions by extending semantic-aware flow transformation in Flow Matching (FM). Comprehensive evaluations on LIDC and ISIC3 datasets demonstrate that ATFM outperforms SOTA methods and simultaneously achieves a more efficient inference. ATFM improves GED and HM-IoU by up to $12\%$ and $7.3\%$ compared to advanced methods.

Topics

cs.CV

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.