Sort by:
Page 1 of 12 results

Protocol of the observational study STRATUM-OS: First step in the development and validation of the STRATUM tool based on multimodal data processing to assist surgery in patients affected by intra-axial brain tumours

Fabelo, H., Ramallo-Farina, Y., Morera, J., Pineiro, J. F., Lagares, A., Jimenez-Roldan, L., Burstrom, G., Garcia-Bello, M. A., Garcia-Perez, L., Falero, R., Gonzalez, M., Duque, S., Rodriguez-Jimenez, C., Hernandez, M., Delgado-Sanchez, J. J., Paredes, A. B., Hernandez, G., Ponce, P., Leon, R., Gonzalez-Martin, J. M., Rodriguez-Esparragon, F., Callico, G. M., Wagner, A. M., Clavo, B., STRATUM,

medrxiv logopreprintJun 13 2025
IntroductionIntegrated digital diagnostics can support complex surgeries in many anatomic sites, and brain tumour surgery represents one of the most complex cases. Neurosurgeons face several challenges during brain tumour surgeries, such as differentiating critical tissue from brain tumour margins. To overcome these challenges, the STRATUM project will develop a 3D decision support tool for brain surgery guidance and diagnostics based on multimodal data processing, including hyperspectral imaging, integrated as a point-of-care computing tool in neurosurgical workflows. This paper reports the protocol for the development and technical validation of the STRATUM tool. Methods and analysisThis international multicentre, prospective, open, observational cohort study, STRATUM-OS (study: 28 months, pre-recruitment: 2 months, recruitment: 20 months, follow-up: 6 months), with no control group, will collect data from 320 patients undergoing standard neurosurgical procedures to: (1) develop and technically validate the STRATUM tool, and (2) collect the outcome measures for comparing the standard procedure versus the standard procedure plus the use of the STRATUM tool during surgery in a subsequent historically controlled non-randomized clinical trial. Ethics and disseminationThe protocol was approved by the participant Ethics Committees. Results will be disseminated in scientific conferences and peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration number[Pending Number] ARTICLE SUMMARYO_ST_ABSStrengths and limitations of this studyC_ST_ABSO_LISTRATUM-OS will be the first multicentre prospective observational study to develop and technically validate a 3D decision support tool for brain surgery guidance and diagnostics in real-time based on artificial intelligence and multimodal data processing, including the emerging hyperspectral imaging modality. C_LIO_LIThis study encompasses a prospective collection of multimodal pre, intra and postoperative medical data, including innovative imaging modalities, from patients with intra-axial brain tumours. C_LIO_LIThis large observational study will act as historical control in a subsequent clinical trial to evaluate a fully-working prototype. C_LIO_LIAlthough the estimated sample size is deemed adequate for the purpose of the study, the complexity of the clinical context and the type of surgery could potentially lead to under-recruitment and under-representation of less prevalent tumour types. C_LI

Physician-level classification performance across multiple imaging domains with a diagnostic medical foundation model and a large dataset of annotated medical images

Thieme, A. H., Miri, T., Marra, A. R., Kobayashi, T., Rodriguez-Nava, G., Li, Y., Barba, T., Er, A. G., Benzler, J., Gertler, M., Riechers, M., Hinze, C., Zheng, Y., Pelz, K., Nagaraj, D., Chen, A., Loeser, A., Ruehle, A., Zamboglou, C., Alyahya, L., Uhlig, M., Machiraju, G., Weimann, K., Lippert, C., Conrad, T., Ma, J., Novoa, R., Moor, M., Hernandez-Boussard, T., Alawad, M., Salinas, J. L., Mittermaier, M., Gevaert, O.

medrxiv logopreprintMay 31 2025
A diagnostic medical foundation model (MedFM) is an artificial intelligence (AI) system engineered to accurately determine diagnoses across various medical imaging modalities and specialties. To train MedFM, we created the PubMed Central Medical Images Dataset (PMCMID), the largest annotated medical image dataset to date, comprising 16,126,659 images from 3,021,780 medical publications. Using AI- and ontology-based methods, we identified 4,482,237 medical images (e.g., clinical photos, X-rays, ultrasounds) and generated comprehensive annotations. To optimize MedFMs performance and assess biases, 13,266 images were manually annotated to establish a multimodal benchmark. MedFM achieved physician-level performance in diagnosis tasks spanning radiology, dermatology, and infectious diseases without requiring specific training. Additionally, we developed the Image2Paper app, allowing clinicians to upload medical images and retrieve relevant literature. The correct diagnoses appeared within the top ten results in 88.4% and at least one relevant differential diagnosis in 93.0%. MedFM and PMCMID were made publicly available. FundingResearch reported here was partially supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) (R01 CA260271), the Saudi Company for Artificial Intelligence (SCAI) Authority, and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK) under the project DAKI-FWS (01MK21009E). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Page 1 of 12 results
Show
per page
1

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.