Prostate cancer is a common malignancy in men, and accurately distinguishing between benign and malignant nodules at an early stage is crucial for optimizing treatment. Multimodal imaging (such as ADC and T2) plays an important role in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, but effectively combining these imaging features for accurate classification remains a challenge. This retrospective study included MRI data from 199 prostate cancer patients. Radiomic features from both the tumor and peritumoral regions were extracted, and a random forest model was used to select the most contributive features for classification. Three machine learning models-Random Forest, XGBoost, and Extra Trees-were then constructed and trained on four different feature combinations (tumor ADC, tumor T2, tumor ADC+T2, and tumor + peritumoral ADC+T2). The model incorporating multimodal imaging features and peritumoral characteristics showed superior classification performance. The Extra Trees model outperformed the others across all feature combinations, particularly in the tumor + peritumoral ADC+T2 group, where the AUC reached 0.729. The AUC values for the other combinations also exceeded 0.65. While the Random Forest and XGBoost models performed slightly lower, they still demonstrated strong classification abilities, with AUCs ranging from 0.63 to 0.72. SHAP analysis revealed that key features, such as tumor texture and peritumoral gray-level features, significantly contributed to the model's classification decisions. The combination of multimodal imaging data with peritumoral features moderately improved the accuracy of prostate cancer classification. This model provides a non-invasive and effective diagnostic tool for clinical use and supports future personalized treatment decisions.

To develop an interpretable machine learning (ML) model using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) radiomic data, dosimetric parameters, and clinical data for predicting radiation-induced hepatic toxicity (RIHT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). A retrospective analysis of 150 HCC patients was performed, with a 7:3 ratio used to divide the data into training and validation cohorts. Radiomic features from the original MRI sequences and Delta-radiomic features were extracted. Seven ML models based on radiomics were developed: logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), decision tree (DT), and artificial neural network (ANN). The predictive performance of the models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and calibration curves. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were employed to interpret the contribution of each variable and its risk threshold. Original radiomic features and Delta-radiomic features were extracted from DCE-MRI images and filtered to generate Radiomics-scores and Delta-Radiomics-scores. These were then combined with independent risk factors (Body Mass Index (BMI), V5, and pre-Child-Pugh score(pre-CP)) identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression and Spearman correlation analysis to construct the ML models. In the training cohort, the AUC values were 0.8651 for LR, 0.7004 for RF, 0.6349 for SVM, 0.6706 for XGBoost, 0.7341 for AdaBoost, 0.6806 for Decision Tree, and 0.6786 for ANN. The corresponding accuracies were 84.4%, 65.6%, 75.0%, 65.6%, 71.9%, 68.8%, and 71.9%, respectively. The validation cohort further confirmed the superiority of the LR model, which was selected as the optimal model. SHAP analysis revealed that Delta-radiomics made a substantial positive contribution to the model. The interpretable ML model based on radiomics provides a non-invasive tool for predicting RIHT in patients with HCC, demonstrating satisfactory discriminative performance.

Increasing evidence suggests that non-operative management (NOM) with antibiotics could serve as a safe alternative to surgery for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AA). However, accurately differentiating between uncomplicated and complicated AA remains challenging. Our aim was to develop and validate machine-learning-based diagnostic models to differentiate uncomplicated from complicated AA. This was a multicenter cohort trial conducted from January 2021 and December 2022 across five tertiary hospitals. Three distinct diagnostic models were created, namely, the clinical-parameter-based model, the CT-radiomics-based model, and the clinical-radiomics-fused model. These models were developed using a comprehensive set of eight machine-learning algorithms, which included logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), gradient boosting (GB), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GNB), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP). The performance and accuracy of these diverse models were compared. All models exhibited excellent diagnostic performance in the training cohort, achieving a maximal AUC of 1.00. For the clinical-parameter model, the GB classifier yielded the optimal AUC of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.90) in the testing cohort, while the LR classifier yielded the optimal AUC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.66-0.86) in the validation cohort. For the CT-radiomics-based model, GB classifier achieved the best AUC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.60-0.88) in the testing cohort, and SVM yielded an optimal AUC of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.51-0.75) in the validation cohort. For the clinical-radiomics-fused model, RF classifier yielded an optimal AUC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.95) in the testing cohort and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.67-0.86) in the validation cohort. An open-access, user-friendly online tool was developed for clinical application. This multicenter study suggests that the clinical-radiomics-fused model, constructed using RF algorithm, effectively differentiated between complicated and uncomplicated AA.