Sort by:
Page 11 of 11101 results

Deep Learning-Based CT-Less Cardiac Segmentation of PET Images: A Robust Methodology for Multi-Tracer Nuclear Cardiovascular Imaging.

Salimi Y, Mansouri Z, Nkoulou R, Mainta I, Zaidi H

pubmed logopapersMay 6 2025
Quantitative cardiovascular PET/CT imaging is useful in the diagnosis of multiple cardiac perfusion and motion pathologies. The common approach for cardiac segmentation consists in using co-registered CT images, exploiting publicly available deep learning (DL)-based segmentation models. However, the mismatch between structural CT images and PET uptake limits the usefulness of these approaches. Besides, the performance of DL models is not consistent over low-dose or ultra-low-dose CT images commonly used in clinical PET/CT imaging. In this work, we developed a DL-based methodology to tackle this issue by segmenting directly cardiac PET images. This study included 406 cardiac PET images from 146 patients (43 <sup>18</sup>F-FDG, 329 <sup>13</sup>N-NH<sub>3</sub>, and 37 <sup>82</sup>Rb images). Using previously trained DL nnU-Net models in our group, we segmented the whole heart and the three main cardiac components, namely the left myocardium (LM), left ventricle cavity (LV), and right ventricle (RV) on co-registered CT images. The segmentation was resampled to PET resolution and edited through a combination of automated image processing and manual correction. The corrected segmentation masks and SUV PET images were fed to a nnU-Net V2 pipeline to be trained in fivefold data split strategy by defining two tasks: task #1 for whole cardiac segmentation and task #2 for segmentation of three cardiac components. Fifteen cardiac images were used as external validation set. The DL delineated masks were compared with standard of reference masks using Dice coefficient, Jaccard distance, mean surface distance, and segment volume relative error (%). Task #1 average Dice coefficient in internal validation fivefold was 0.932 ± 0.033. The average Dice on the 15 external cases were comparable with the fivefold Dice reaching an average of 0.941 ± 0.018. Task #2 average Dice in fivefold validation was 0.88 ± 0.063, 0.828 ± 0.091, and 0.876 ± 0.062 for LM, LV, and RV, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference among the Dice coefficients, neither between images acquired by three radiotracers nor between the different folds (P-values >  > 0.05). The overall average volume prediction error in cardiac components segmentation was less than 2%. We developed an automated DL-based segmentation pipeline to segment the whole heart and cardiac components with acceptable accuracy and robust performance in the external test set and over three radiotracers used in nuclear cardiovascular imaging. The proposed methodology can overcome unreliable segmentations performed on CT images.
Page 11 of 11101 results
Show
per page

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.