Automated Assessment of Choroidal Mass Dimensions Using Static and Dynamic Ultrasonographic Imaging

Authors

Emmert, N.,Wall, G.,Nabavi, A.,Rahdar, A.,Wilson, M.,King, B.,Cernichiaro-Espinosa, L.,Yousefi, S.

Affiliations (1)

  • Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA

Abstract

PurposeTo develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model that automatically measures choroidal mass dimensions on B{square}scan ophthalmic ultrasound still images and cine loops. DesignRetrospective diagnostic accuracy study with internal and external validation. ParticipantsThe dataset included 1,822 still images and 283 cine loops of choroidal masses for model development and testing. An additional 182 still images were used for external validation, and 302 control images with other diagnoses were included to assess specificity MethodsA deep convolutional neural network (CNN) based on the U-Net architecture was developed to automatically measure the apical height and basal diameter of choroidal masses on B-scan ultrasound. All still images were manually annotated by expert graders and reviewed by a senior ocular oncologist. Cine loops were analyzed frame by frame and the frame with the largest detected mass dimensions was selected for evaluation. Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome was the models measurement accuracy, defined by the mean absolute error (MAE) in millimeters, compared to expert manual annotations, for both apical height and basal diameter. Secondary metrics included the Dice coefficient, coefficient of determination (R2), and mean pixel distance between predicted and reference measurements. ResultsOn the internal test set of still images, the model successfully detected the tumor in 99.7% of cases. The mean absolute error (MAE) was 0.38 {+/-} 0.55 mm for apical height (95.1% of measurements <1 mm of the expert annotation) and was 0.99 {+/-} 1.15 mm for basal diameter (64.4% of measurements <1 mm). Linear agreement between predicted and reference measurements was strong, with R2 values of 0.74 for apical height and 0.89 for basal diameter. When applied to the control set of 302 control images, the model demonstrated a moderate false positive rate. On the external validation set, the model maintained comparable accuracy. Among the cine loops, the model detected tumors in 89.4% of cases with comparable accuracy. ConclusionDeep learning can deliver fast, reproducible, millimeter{square}level measurements of choroidal mass dimensions with robust performance across different mass types and imaging sources. These findings support the potential clinical utility of AI-assisted measurement tools in ocular oncology workflows.

Topics

ophthalmology

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.