Multimodal AI to forecast arrhythmic death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors

Lai C,Yin M,Kholmovski EG,Popescu DM,Lu DY,Scherer E,Binka E,Zimmerman SL,Chrispin J,Hays AG,Phelan DM,Abraham MR,Trayanova NA

Affiliations (8)

  • Alliance for Cardiovascular Diagnostic and Treatment Innovation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center of Excellence, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
  • Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Alliance for Cardiovascular Diagnostic and Treatment Innovation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. [email protected].
  • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. [email protected].

Abstract

Sudden cardiac death from ventricular arrhythmias is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Arrhythmic death prognostication is challenging in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), a setting where current clinical guidelines show low performance and inconsistent accuracy. Here, we present a deep learning approach, MAARS (Multimodal Artificial intelligence for ventricular Arrhythmia Risk Stratification), to forecast lethal arrhythmia events in patients with HCM by analyzing multimodal medical data. MAARS' transformer-based neural networks learn from electronic health records, echocardiogram and radiology reports, and contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images, the latter being a unique feature of this model. MAARS achieves an area under the curve of 0.89 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-0.94) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.69-0.93) in internal and external cohorts and outperforms current clinical guidelines by 0.27-0.35 (internal) and 0.22-0.30 (external). In contrast to clinical guidelines, it demonstrates fairness across demographic subgroups. We interpret MAARS' predictions on multiple levels to promote artificial intelligence transparency and derive risk factors warranting further investigation.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.