Cross-site Validation of AI Segmentation and Harmonization in Breast MRI.

Authors

Huang Y,Leotta NJ,Hirsch L,Gullo RL,Hughes M,Reiner J,Saphier NB,Myers KS,Panigrahi B,Ambinder E,Di Carlo P,Grimm LJ,Lowell D,Yoon S,Ghate SV,Parra LC,Sutton EJ

Affiliations (5)

  • Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, 160 Convent Ave, New York, NY, 10031, USA.
  • Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
  • Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
  • Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
  • Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, 160 Convent Ave, New York, NY, 10031, USA. [email protected].

Abstract

This work aims to perform a cross-site validation of automated segmentation for breast cancers in MRI and to compare the performance to radiologists. A three-dimensional (3D) U-Net was trained to segment cancers in dynamic contrast-enhanced axial MRIs using a large dataset from Site 1 (n = 15,266; 449 malignant and 14,817 benign). Performance was validated on site-specific test data from this and two additional sites, and common publicly available testing data. Four radiologists from each of the three clinical sites provided two-dimensional (2D) segmentations as ground truth. Segmentation performance did not differ between the network and radiologists on the test data from Sites 1 and 2 or the common public data (median Dice score Site 1, network 0.86 vs. radiologist 0.85, n = 114; Site 2, 0.91 vs. 0.91, n = 50; common: 0.93 vs. 0.90). For Site 3, an affine input layer was fine-tuned using segmentation labels, resulting in comparable performance between the network and radiologist (0.88 vs. 0.89, n = 42). Radiologist performance differed on the common test data, and the network numerically outperformed 11 of the 12 radiologists (median Dice: 0.85-0.94, n = 20). In conclusion, a deep network with a novel supervised harmonization technique matches radiologists' performance in MRI tumor segmentation across clinical sites. We make code and weights publicly available to promote reproducible AI in radiology.

Topics

Magnetic Resonance ImagingBreast NeoplasmsImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedArtificial IntelligenceJournal ArticleValidation Study
Get Started

Upload your X-ray image and get interpretation.

Upload now →

Disclaimer: X-ray Interpreter's AI-generated results are for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult a healthcare professional for medical diagnosis and treatment.