Accurate adult age estimation represents a critical component of forensic individual identification. However, traditional methods relying on skeletal developmental characteristics are susceptible to preservation status and developmental variation. Teeth, owing to their exceptional taphonomic resistance and minimal postmortem alteration, emerge as premier biological samples. Utilizing the high-resolution capabilities of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), this study retrospectively analyzed 1,857 right first molars obtained from Han Chinese adults in Sichuan Province (883 males, 974 females; aged 18-65 years). Pulp chamber volume (PCV) was measured using semi-automatic segmentation in Mimics software (v21.0). Statistically significant differences in PCV were observed based on sex and tooth position (maxillary vs. mandibular). Significant negative correlations existed between PCV and age (r = -0.86 to -0.81). The strongest correlation (r = -0.88) was identified in female maxillary first molars. Eleven curvilinear regression models and six machine learning models (Linear Regression, Lasso Regression, Neural Network, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost) were developed. Among the curvilinear regression models, the cubic model demonstrated the best performance, with the female maxillary-specific model achieving a mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.95 years. Machine learning models demonstrated superior accuracy. Specifically, the sex- and tooth position-specific XGBoost model for female maxillary first molars achieved an MAE of 3.14 years (R{superscript 2} = 0.87). This represents a significant 36.5% reduction in error compared to the optimal cubic regression model. These findings demonstrate that PCV measurements in first molars, combined with machine learning algorithms (specifically XGBoost), effectively overcome the limitations of traditional methods, providing a highly precise and reproducible approach for forensic age estimation.

BackgroundConvolutional neural networks (CNNs) have emerged to reduce clinical resources and standardize auto-contouring of organs-at-risk (OARs). Although CNNs perform adequately for most patients, understanding when the CNN might fail is critical for effective and safe clinical deployment. However, the limitations of CNNs are poorly understood because of their black-box nature. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) can expose CNNs inner mechanisms for classification. Here, we investigate the inner mechanisms of CNNs for segmentation and explore a novel, computational approach to a-priori flag potentially insufficient parotid gland (PG) contours. MethodsFirst, 3D UNets were trained in three PG segmentation situations using (1) synthetic cases; (2) 1925 clinical computed tomography (CT) scans with typical and (3) more consistent contours curated through a previously validated auto-curation step. Then, we generated attribution maps for seven XAI methods, and qualitatively assessed them for congruency between simulated and clinical contours, and how much XAI agreed with expert reasoning. To objectify observations, we explored persistent homology intensity filtrations to capture essential topological characteristics of XAI attributions. Principal component (PC) eigenvalues of Euler characteristic profiles were correlated with spatial agreement (Dice-Sorensen similarity coefficient; DSC). Evaluation was done using sensitivity, specificity and the area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve on an external AAPM dataset, where as proof-of-principle, we regard the lowest 15% DSC as insufficient. ResultsPatternNet attributions (PNet-A) focused on soft-tissue structures, whereas guided backpropagation (GBP) highlighted both soft-tissue and high-density structures (e.g. mandible bone), which was congruent with synthetic situations. Both methods typically had higher/denser activations in better auto-contoured medial and anterior lobes. Curated models produced "cleaner" gradient class-activation mapping (GCAM) attributions. Quantitative analysis showed that PC{lambda}1 of guided GCAMs (GGCAM) Euler characteristic (EC) profile had good predictive value (sensitivity>0.85, specificity>0.9) of DSC for AAPM cases, with AUROC=0.66, 0.74, 0.94, 0.83 for GBP, GCAM, GGCAM and PNet-A. For for {lambda}1<-1.8e3 of GGCAMs EC-profile, 87% of cases were insufficient. ConclusionsGBP and PNet-A qualitatively agreed most with expert reasoning on directly (structure borders) and indirectly (proxies used for identifying structure borders) important features for PG segmentation. Additionally, this work investigated as proof-of-principle how topological data analysis could possibly be used for quantitative XAI signal analysis to a-priori mark potentially inadequate CNN-segmentations, using only features from inside the predicted PG. This work used PG as a well-understood segmentation paradigm and may extend to target volumes and other organs-at-risk.

Deep learning has emerged as a promising tool for automating gastrointestinal (GI) disease diagnosis. However, multi-class GI disease classification remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by presenting a framework that uses advanced models like InceptionNetV3 and ResNet50, combined with boosting algorithms (XGB, LGBM), to classify lower GI abnormalities. InceptionNetV3 with XGB achieved the best recall of 0.81 and an F1 score of 0.90. To assist clinicians in understanding model decisions, the Grad-CAM technique, a form of explainable AI, was employed to highlight the critical regions influencing predictions, fostering trust in these systems. This approach significantly improves both the accuracy and reliability of GI disease diagnosis.

Despite continued advances in oncology, cancer remains a leading cause of global mortality, highlighting the need for diagnostic and prognostic tools that are both accurate and interpretable. Unimodal approaches often fail to capture the biological and clinical complexity of tumors. In this study, we present a suite of task-specific AI models that leverage CT imaging, multi-omics profiles, and structured clinical data to address distinct challenges in segmentation, classification, and prognosis. We developed three independent models across large public datasets. Task 1 applied a 3D U-Net to segment pancreatic tumors from CT scans, achieving a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.7062. Task 2 employed a hierarchical ensemble of omics-based classifiers to distinguish tumor from normal tissue and classify six major cancer types with 98.67% accuracy. Task 3 benchmarked classical machine learning models on clinical data for prognosis prediction across three cancers (LIHC, KIRC, STAD), achieving strong performance (e.g., C-index of 0.820 in KIRC, AUC of 0.978 in LIHC). Across all tasks, explainable AI methods such as SHAP and attention-based visualization enabled transparent interpretation of model outputs. These results demonstrate the value of tailored, modality-aware models and underscore the clinical potential of applying such tailored AI systems for precision oncology. Technical FoundationsO_LISegmentation (Task 1): A custom 3D U-Net was trained using the Task07_Pancreas dataset from the Medical Segmentation Decathlon (MSD). CT images were preprocessed with MONAI-based pipelines, resampled to (64, 96, 96) voxels, and intensity-windowed to HU ranges of -100 to 240. C_LIO_LIClassification (Task 2): Multi-omics data from TCGA--including gene expression, methylation, miRNA, CNV, and mutation profiles--were log-transformed and normalized. Five modality-specific LightGBM classifiers generated meta-features for a late-fusion ensemble. Stratified 5-fold cross-validation was used for evaluation. C_LIO_LIPrognosis (Task 3): Clinical variables from TCGA were curated and imputed (median/mode), with high-missing-rate columns removed. Survival models (e.g., Cox-PH, Random Forest, XGBoost) were trained with early stopping. No omics or imaging data were used in this task. C_LIO_LIInterpretability: SHAP values were computed for all tree-based models, and attention-based overlays were used in imaging tasks to visualize salient regions. C_LI

Background and aimsAcute pancreatitis (AP) is a common gastrointestinal disease with rising global incidence. While most cases are mild, severe AP (SAP) carries high mortality. Early and accurate severity prediction is crucial for optimal management. However, existing severity prediction models, such as BISAP and mCTSI, have modest accuracy and often rely on data unavailable at admission. This study proposes a deep learning (DL) model to predict AP severity using abdominal contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans acquired within 24 hours of admission. MethodsWe collected 10,130 studies from 8,335 patients across a multi-site U.S. health system. The model was trained in two stages: (1) self-supervised pretraining on large-scale unlabeled CT studies and (2) fine-tuning on 550 labeled studies. Performance was evaluated against mCTSI and BISAP on a hold-out internal test set (n=100 patients) and externally validated on a Hungarian AP registry (n=518 patients). ResultsOn the internal test set, the model achieved AUROCs of 0.888 (95% CI: 0.800-0.960) for SAP and 0.888 (95% CI: 0.819-0.946) for mild AP (MAP), outperforming mCTSI (p = 0.002). External validation showed robust AUROCs of 0.887 (95% CI: 0.825-0.941) for SAP and 0.858 (95% CI: 0.826-0.888) for MAP, surpassing mCTSI (p = 0.024) and BISAP (p = 0.002). Retrospective simulation suggested the models potential to support admission triage and serve as a second reader during CECT interpretation. ConclusionsThe proposed DL model outperformed standard scoring systems for AP severity prediction, generalized well to external data, and shows promise for providing early clinical decision support and improving resource allocation.

Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer mortality, and while low dose CT screening improves mortality, radiological detection is challenging due to the increasing shortage of radiologists. Artificial intelligence can significantly improve the procedure and also decrease the overall workload of the entire healthcare department. Building upon the existing works of application of genetic algorithm this study aims to create a novel algorithm for lung cancer diagnosis with utmost precision. We included a total of 156 CT scans of patients divided into two databases, followed by feature extraction using image statistics, histograms, and 2D transforms (FFT, DCT, WHT). Optimal feature vectors were formed and organized into Excel based knowledge-bases. Genetically trained classifiers like MLP, GFF-NN, MNN and SVM, are then optimized, with experimentations with different combinations of parameters, activation functions, and data partitioning percentages. Evaluation metrics included classification accuracy, Mean Squared Error (MSE), Area under Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve, and computational efficiency. Computer simulations demonstrated that the MNN (Topology II) classifier, specifically when trained with FFT coefficients and a momentum learning rule, consistently achieved 100% average classification accuracy on the cross-validation dataset for both Data-base I and Data-base II, outperforming MLP-based classifiers. This genetically optimized and trained MNN (Topology II) classifier is therefore recommended as the optimal solution for lung cancer diagnosis from CT scan images.

Precise aneurysm volume measurement offers a transformative edge for risk assessment and treatment planning in clinical settings. Currently, clinical assessments rely heavily on manual review of medical imaging, a process that is time-consuming and prone to inter-observer variability. The widely accepted standard-of-care primarily focuses on measuring aneurysm diameter at its widest point, providing a limited perspective on aneurysm morphology and lacking efficient methods to measure aneurysm volumes. Yet, volume measurement can offer deeper insight into aneurysm progression and severity. In this study, we propose an automated approach that leverages the strengths of pre-trained neural networks and expert systems to delineate aneurysm boundaries and compute volumes on an unannotated dataset from 60 patients. The dataset includes slice-level start/end annotations for aneurysm but no pixel-wise aorta segmentations. Our method utilizes a pre-trained UNet to automatically locate the aorta, employs SAM2 to track the aorta through vascular irregularities such as aneurysms down to the iliac bifurcation, and finally uses a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network or expert system to identify the beginning and end points of the aneurysm within the aorta. Despite no manual aorta segmentation, our approach achieves promising accuracy, predicting the aneurysm start point with an R2 score of 71%, the end point with an R2 score of 76%, and the volume with an R2 score of 92%. This technique has the potential to facilitate large-scale aneurysm analysis and improve clinical decision-making by reducing dependence on annotated datasets.

Background & purposeLate radiation-associated dysphagia after head and neck cancer (HNC) significantly impacts patients health and quality of life. Conventional normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models use discrete dose parameters to predict toxicity risk but fail to fully capture the complexity of this side effect. Deep learning (DL) offers potential improvements by incorporating 3D dose data for all anatomical structures involved in swallowing. This study aims to enhance dysphagia prediction with 3D DL NTCP models compared to conventional NTCP models. Materials & methodsA multi-institutional cohort of 1484 HNC patients was used to train and validate a 3D DL model (Residual Network) incorporating 3D dose distributions, organ-at-risk segmentations, and CT scans, with or without patient- or treatment-related data. Predictions of grade [&ge;]2 dysphagia (CTCAEv4) at six months post-treatment were evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) and calibration curves. Results were compared to a conventional NTCP model based on pre-treatment dysphagia, tumour location, and mean dose to swallowing organs. Attention maps highlighting regions of interest for individual patients were assessed. ResultsDL models outperformed the conventional NTCP model in both the independent test set (AUC=0.80-0.84 versus 0.76) and external test set (AUC=0.73-0.74 versus 0.63) in AUC and calibration. Attention maps showed a focus on the oral cavity and superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle. ConclusionDL NTCP models performed better than the conventional NTCP model, suggesting the benefit of using 3D-input over the conventional discrete dose parameters. Attention maps highlighted relevant regions linked to dysphagia, supporting the utility of DL for improved predictions.

BackgroundCT-based radio-biomarkers could provide non-invasive insights into tumour biology to risk-stratify patients. One of the limitations is laborious manual segmentation of regions-of-interest (ROI). We present a deep learning auto-segmentation pipeline for radiomic analysis. Patients and Methods153 patients with resected stage 2A-3B non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLCs) had tumours segmented using nnU-Net with review by two clinicians. The nnU-Net was pretrained with anatomical priors in non-cancerous lungs and finetuned on NSCLCs. Three ROIs were segmented: intra-tumoural, peri-tumoural, and whole lung. 1967 features were extracted using PyRadiomics. Feature reproducibility was tested using segmentation perturbations. Features were selected using minimum-redundancy-maximum-relevance with Random Forest-recursive feature elimination nested in 500 bootstraps. ResultsAuto-segmentation time was [~]36 seconds/series. Mean volumetric and surface Dice-Sorensen coefficient (DSC) scores were 0.84 ({+/-}0.28), and 0.79 ({+/-}0.34) respectively. DSC were significantly correlated with tumour shape (sphericity, diameter) and location (worse with chest wall adherence), but not batch effects (e.g. contrast, reconstruction kernel). 6.5% cases had missed segmentations; 6.5% required major changes. Pre-training on anatomical priors resulted in better segmentations compared to training on tumour-labels alone (p<0.001) and tumour with anatomical labels (p<0.001). Most radiomic features were not reproducible following perturbations and resampling. Adding radiomic features, however, did not significantly improve the clinical model in predicting 2-year disease-free survival: AUCs 0.67 (95%CI 0.59-0.75) vs 0.63 (95%CI 0.54-0.71) respectively (p=0.28). ConclusionOur study demonstrates that integrating auto-segmentation into radio-biomarker discovery is feasible with high efficiency and accuracy. Whilst radiomic analysis show limited reproducibility, our auto-segmentation may allow more robust radio-biomarker analysis using deep learning features.

BackgroundArtificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly changing the legal landscape of radiology. Results from a previous experiment suggested that providing AI error rates can reduce perceived radiologist culpability, as judged by mock jury members (4). The current study advances this work by examining whether the radiologists behavior also impacts perceptions of liability. Methods. Participants (n=282) read about a hypothetical malpractice case where a 50-year-old who visited the Emergency Department with acute neurological symptoms received a brain CT scan to determine if bleeding was present. An AI system was used by the radiologist who interpreted imaging. The AI system correctly flagged the case as abnormal. Nonetheless, the radiologist concluded no evidence of bleeding, and the blood-thinner t-PA was administered. Participants were randomly assigned to either a 1.) single-read condition, where the radiologist interpreted the CT once after seeing AI feedback, or 2.) a double-read condition, where the radiologist interpreted the CT twice, first without AI and then with AI feedback. Participants were then told the patient suffered irreversible brain damage due to the missed brain bleed, resulting in the patient (plaintiff) suing the radiologist (defendant). Participants indicated whether the radiologist met their duty of care to the patient (yes/no). Results. Hypothetical jurors were more likely to side with the plaintiff in the single-read condition (106/142, 74.7%) than in the double-read condition (74/140, 52.9%), p=0.0002. Conclusion. This suggests that the penalty for disagreeing with correct AI can be mitigated when images are interpreted twice, or at least if a radiologist gives an interpretation before AI is used.