Endoscopic image classification plays a pivotal role in medical diagnostics by identifying anatomical landmarks and pathological findings. However, conventional closed-set classification frameworks are inherently limited in open-world clinical settings, where previously unseen conditions can arise andcompromise model reliability. To address this, we explore the application of Open Set Recognition (OSR) techniques on the Kvasir dataset, a publicly available and diverse endoscopic image collection. In this study, we evaluate and compare the OSR capabilities of several representative deep learning architectures, including ResNet-50, Swin Transformer, and a hybrid ResNet-Transformer model, under both closed-set and open-set conditions. OpenMax is adopted as a baseline OSR method to assess the ability of these models to distinguish known classes from previously unseen categories. This work represents one of the first efforts to apply open set recognition to the Kvasir dataset and provides a foundational benchmark for evaluating OSR performance in medical image analysis. Our results offer practical insights into model behavior in clinically realistic settings and highlight the importance of OSR techniques for the safe deployment of AI systems in endoscopy.

Bias field artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans introduce spatially smooth intensity inhomogeneities that degrade image quality and hinder downstream analysis. To address this challenge, we propose a novel variational Hadamard U-Net (VHU-Net) for effective body MRI bias field correction. The encoder comprises multiple convolutional Hadamard transform blocks (ConvHTBlocks), each integrating convolutional layers with a Hadamard transform (HT) layer. Specifically, the HT layer performs channel-wise frequency decomposition to isolate low-frequency components, while a subsequent scaling layer and semi-soft thresholding mechanism suppress redundant high-frequency noise. To compensate for the HT layer's inability to model inter-channel dependencies, the decoder incorporates an inverse HT-reconstructed transformer block, enabling global, frequency-aware attention for the recovery of spatially consistent bias fields. The stacked decoder ConvHTBlocks further enhance the capacity to reconstruct the underlying ground-truth bias field. Building on the principles of variational inference, we formulate a new evidence lower bound (ELBO) as the training objective, promoting sparsity in the latent space while ensuring accurate bias field estimation. Comprehensive experiments on abdominal and prostate MRI datasets demonstrate the superiority of VHU-Net over existing state-of-the-art methods in terms of intensity uniformity, signal fidelity, and tissue contrast. Moreover, the corrected images yield substantial downstream improvements in segmentation accuracy. Our framework offers computational efficiency, interpretability, and robust performance across multi-center datasets, making it suitable for clinical deployment.

Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) remain the leading cause of mortality globally, as reported in the Global Disease Burden Study 2021. Opportunistic screening leverages data collected from routine health check-ups and multimodal data can play a key role to identify at-risk individuals. Chest X-rays (CXR) provide insights into chronic conditions contributing to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), while 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) directly assesses cardiac electrical activity and structural abnormalities. Integrating CXR and ECG could offer a more comprehensive risk assessment than conventional models, which rely on clinical scores, computed tomography (CT) measurements, or biomarkers, which may be limited by sampling bias and single modality constraints. We propose a novel predictive modeling framework - MOSCARD, multimodal causal reasoning with co-attention to align two distinct modalities and simultaneously mitigate bias and confounders in opportunistic risk estimation. Primary technical contributions are - (i) multimodal alignment of CXR with ECG guidance; (ii) integration of causal reasoning; (iii) dual back-propagation graph for de-confounding. Evaluated on internal, shift data from emergency department (ED) and external MIMIC datasets, our model outperformed single modality and state-of-the-art foundational models - AUC: 0.75, 0.83, 0.71 respectively. Proposed cost-effective opportunistic screening enables early intervention, improving patient outcomes and reducing disparities.

Image registration is used in many medical image analysis applications, such as tracking the motion of tissue in cardiac images, where cardiac kinematics can be an indicator of tissue health. Registration is a challenging problem for deep learning algorithms because ground truth transformations are not feasible to create, and because there are potentially multiple transformations that can produce images that appear correlated with the goal. Unsupervised methods have been proposed to learn to predict effective transformations, but these methods take significantly longer to predict than established baseline methods. For a deep learning method to see adoption in wider research and clinical settings, it should be designed to run in a reasonable time on common, mid-level hardware. Fast methods have been proposed for the task of image registration but often use patch-based methods which can affect registration accuracy for a highly dynamic organ such as the heart. In this thesis, a fast, volumetric registration model is proposed for the use of quantifying cardiac strain. The proposed Deep Learning Neural Network (DLNN) is designed to utilize an architecture that can compute convolutions incredibly efficiently, allowing the model to achieve registration fidelity similar to other state-of-the-art models while taking a fraction of the time to perform inference. The proposed fast and lightweight registration (FLIR) model is used to predict tissue motion which is then used to quantify the non-uniform strain experienced by the tissue. For acquisitions taken from the same patient at approximately the same time, it would be expected that strain values measured between the acquisitions would have very small differences. Using this metric, strain values computed using the FLIR method are shown to be very consistent.

BackgroundGenerative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) has demonstrated strong performance in standardized medical examinations but has limitations in real-world clinical settings. The newly released multimodal GPT-4o model, which integrates text and image inputs to enhance diagnostic capabilities, and the multimodal o1 model, which incorporates advanced reasoning, may address these limitations. ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the performance of GPT-4o and o1 against clinicians in real-world clinical case challenges. MethodsThis retrospective, cross-sectional study used Medscape case challenge questions from May 2011 to June 2024 (n = 1,426). Each case included text and images of patient history, physical examination findings, diagnostic test results, and imaging studies. Clinicians were required to choose one answer from among multiple options, with the most frequent response defined as the clinicians decision. Data-based decisions were made using GPT models (3.5 Turbo, 4 Turbo, 4 Omni, and o1) to interpret the text and images, followed by a process to provide a formatted answer. We compared the performances of the clinicians and GPT models using Mixed-effects logistic regression analysis. ResultsOf the 1,426 questions, clinicians achieved an overall accuracy of 85.0%, whereas GPT-4o and o1 demonstrated higher accuracies of 88.4% and 94.3% (mean difference 3.4%; P = .005 and mean difference 9.3%; P < .001), respectively. In the multimodal performance analysis, which included cases involving images (n = 917), GPT-4o achieved an accuracy of 88.3%, and o1 achieved 93.9%, both significantly outperforming clinicians (mean difference 4.2%; P = .005 and mean difference 9.8%; P < .001). o1 showed the highest accuracy across all question categories, achieving 92.6% in diagnosis (mean difference 14.5%; P < .001), 97.0% in disease characteristics (mean difference 7.2%; P < .001), 92.6% in examination (mean difference 7.3%; P = .002), and 94.8% in treatment (mean difference 4.3%; P = .005), consistently outperforming clinicians. In terms of medical specialty, o1 achieved 93.6% accuracy in internal medicine (mean difference 10.3%; P < .001), 96.6% in major surgery (mean difference 9.2%; P = .030), 97.3% in psychiatry (mean difference 10.6%; P = .030), and 95.4% in minor specialties (mean difference 10.0%; P < .001), significantly surpassing clinicians. Across five trials, GPT-4o and o1 provided the correct answer 5/5 times in 86.2% and 90.7% of the cases, respectively. ConclusionsThe GPT-4o and o1 models achieved higher accuracy than clinicians in clinical case challenge questions, particularly in disease diagnosis. The GPT-4o and o1 could serve as valuable tools to assist healthcare professionals in clinical settings.

PurposeTo assess and compare the accuracy and legitimacy of multimodal large language models (LLMs) on the Japan Diagnostic Radiology Board Examination (JDRBE). Materials and methodsThe dataset comprised questions from JDRBE 2021, 2023, and 2024, with ground-truth answers established through consensus among multiple board-certified diagnostic radiologists. Questions without associated images and those lacking unanimous agreement on answers were excluded. Eight LLMs were evaluated: GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, GPT-4.1, o3, o4-mini, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, and Gemini 2.5 Pro. Each model was evaluated under two conditions: with inputting images (vision) and without (text-only). Performance differences between the conditions were assessed using McNemars exact test. Two diagnostic radiologists (with 2 and 18 years of experience) independently rated the legitimacy of responses from four models (GPT-4 Turbo, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, o3, and Gemini 2.5 Pro) using a five-point Likert scale, blinded to model identity. Legitimacy scores were analyzed using Friedmans test, followed by pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm correction. ResultsThe dataset included 233 questions. Under the vision condition, o3 achieved the highest accuracy at 72%, followed by o4-mini (70%) and Gemini 2.5 Pro (70%). Under the text-only condition, o3 topped the list with an accuracy of 67%. Addition of image input significantly improved the accuracy of two models (Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-4.5), but not the others. Both o3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro received significantly higher legitimacy scores than GPT-4 Turbo and Claude 3.7 Sonnet from both raters. ConclusionRecent multimodal LLMs, particularly o3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro, have demonstrated remarkable progress on JDRBE questions, reflecting their rapid evolution in diagnostic radiology. Secondary abstract Eight multimodal large language models were evaluated on the Japan Diagnostic Radiology Board Examination. OpenAIs o3 and Google DeepMinds Gemini 2.5 Pro achieved high accuracy rates (72% and 70%) and received good legitimacy scores from human raters, demonstrating steady progress.

PURPOSECardiac amyloidosis (CA), a life-threatening infiltrative cardiomyopathy, can be non-invasively diagnosed using [99mTc]Tc-bisphosphonate SPECT/CT. However, subjective visual interpretation risks diagnostic inaccuracies. We developed and validated a machine learning (ML) framework leveraging SPECT/CT radiomics to automate CA detection. METHODSThis retrospective multicenter study analyzed 290 patients of suspected CA who underwent [99mTc]Tc-PYP or [99mTc]Tc-DPD SPECT/CT. Radiomic features were extracted from co-registered SPECT and CT images, harmonized via intra-class correlation and Pearson correlation filtering, and optimized through LASSO regression. A stacking ensemble model incorporating support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) classifiers was constructed. The model was validated using an internal validation set (n = 54) and two external test set (n = 54 and n = 58).Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Feature importance was interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. RESULTSOf 290 patients, 117 (40.3%) had CA. The stacking radiomics model attained AUCs of 0.871, 0.824, and 0.839 in the validation, test 1, and test 2 cohorts, respectively, significantly outperforming the clinical model (AUC 0.546 in validation set, P<0.05). DCA demonstrated superior net benefit over the clinical model across relevant thresholds, and SHAP analysis highlighted wavelet-transformed first-order and texture features as key predictors. CONCLUSIONA stacking ML model with SPECT/CT radiomics improves CA diagnosis, showing strong generalizability across varied imaging protocols and populations and highlighting its potential as a decision-support tool.

Radiographic knee alignment (KA) measurement is important for predicting joint health and surgical outcomes after total knee replacement. Traditional methods for KA measurements are manual, time-consuming and require long-leg radiographs. This study proposes a deep learning-based method to measure KA in anteroposterior knee radiographs via automatically localized knee anatomical landmarks. Our method builds on hourglass networks and incorporates an attention gate structure to enhance robustness and focus on key anatomical features. To our knowledge, this is the first deep learning-based method to localize over 100 knee anatomical landmarks to fully outline the knee shape while integrating KA measurements on both pre-operative and post-operative images. It provides highly accurate and reliable anatomical varus/valgus KA measurements using the anatomical tibiofemoral angle, achieving mean absolute differences ~1{\deg} when compared to clinical ground truth measurements. Agreement between automated and clinical measurements was excellent pre-operatively (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.97) and good post-operatively (ICC = 0.86). Our findings demonstrate that KA assessment can be automated with high accuracy, creating opportunities for digitally enhanced clinical workflows.

Deep learning-based medical image classification techniques are rapidly advancing in medical image analysis, making it crucial to develop accurate and trustworthy models that can be efficiently deployed across diverse clinical scenarios. Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs), which first predict a set of explainable concepts from images and then perform classification based on these concepts, are increasingly being adopted for explainable medical image classification. However, the inherent explainability of CBMs introduces new challenges when deploying trained models to new environments. Variations in imaging protocols and staining methods may induce concept-level shifts, such as alterations in color distribution and scale. Furthermore, since CBM training requires explicit concept annotations, fine-tuning models solely with image-level labels could compromise concept prediction accuracy and faithfulness - a critical limitation given the high cost of acquiring expert-annotated concept labels in medical domains. To address these challenges, we propose a training-free confusion concept identification strategy. By leveraging minimal new data (e.g., 4 images per class) with only image-level labels, our approach enhances out-of-domain performance without sacrificing source domain accuracy through two key operations: masking misactivated confounding concepts and amplifying under-activated discriminative concepts. The efficacy of our method is validated on both skin and white blood cell images. Our code is available at: https://github.com/riverback/TF-TTI-XMed.

Aimed to develop and validate a CT radiomics-based explainable machine learning model for diagnosing malignancy and benignity specifically in endometrial cancer (EC) patients. A total of 83 EC patients from two centers, including 46 with malignant and 37 with benign conditions, were included, with data split into a training set (n=59) and a testing set (n=24). The regions of interest (ROIs) were manually segmented from pre-surgical CT scans, and 1132 radiomic features were extracted from the pre-surgical CT scans using Pyradiomics. Six explainable machine learning modeling algorithms were implemented respectively, for determining the optimal radiomics pipeline. The diagnostic performance of the radiomic model was evaluated by using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, F1 score, confusion matrices, and ROC curves. To enhance clinical understanding and usability, we separately implemented SHAP analysis and feature mapping visualization, and evaluated the calibration curve and decision curve. By comparing six modeling strategies, the Random Forest model emerged as the optimal choice for diagnosing EC, with a training AUC of 1.00 and a testing AUC of 0.96. SHAP identified the most important radiomic features, revealing that all selected features were significantly associated with EC (P < 0.05). Radiomics feature maps also provide a feasible assessment tool for clinical applications. DCA indicated a higher net benefit for our model compared to the "All" and "None" strategies, suggesting its clinical utility in identifying high-risk cases and reducing unnecessary interventions. In conclusion, the CT radiomics-based explainable machine learning model achieved high diagnostic performance, which could be used as an intelligent auxiliary tool for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.