Back to all papers

A Comparative Evaluation of Meta-Learning Models for Few-Shot Chest X-Ray Disease Classification.

Authors

Quiñonez-Baca LC,Ramirez-Alonso G,Gaxiola F,Manzo-Martinez A,Cornejo R,Lopez-Flores DR

Affiliations (3)

  • Computer Vision and Data Science Lab, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Circuito Universitario Campus II, Chihuahua 31125, Mexico.
  • Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Circuito Universitario Campus II, Chihuahua 31125, Mexico.
  • División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Tecnológico Nacional de México/IT de Chihuahua, Ave. Tecnológico 2909, Chihuahua 31200, Mexico.

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The limited availability of labeled data, particularly in the medical domain, poses a significant challenge for training accurate diagnostic models. While deep learning techniques have demonstrated notable efficacy in image-based tasks, they require large annotated datasets. In data-scarce scenarios-especially involving rare diseases-their performance deteriorates significantly. Meta-learning offers a promising alternative by enabling models to adapt quickly to new tasks using prior knowledge and only a few labeled examples. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of representative meta-learning models for thoracic disease classification in chest X-rays. <b>Methods</b>: We conduct a comparative evaluation of four meta-learning models: Prototypical Networks, Relation Networks, MAML, and FoMAML. First, we assess five backbone architectures (ConvNeXt, DenseNet-121, ResNet-50, MobileNetV2, and ViT) using a Prototypical Network. The best-performing backbone is then used across all meta-learning models for fair comparison. Experiments are performed on the ChestX-ray14 dataset under a 2-way setting with multiple <i>k</i>-shot configurations. <b>Results</b>: Prototypical Networks combined with DenseNet-121 achieved the best performance, with a recall of 68.1%, an F1-score of 67.4%, and a precision of 0.693 in the 2-way, 10-shot configuration. In a disease-specific analysis, Hernia obtains the best classification results. Furthermore, Prototypical and Relation Networks demonstrate significantly higher computational efficiency, requiring fewer FLOPs and shorter execution times than MAML and FoMAML. <b>Conclusions</b>: Prototype-based meta-learning, particularly with DenseNet-121, proves to be a robust and computationally efficient approach for few-shot chest X-ray disease classification. These findings highlight its potential for real-world clinical applications, especially in scenarios with limited annotated medical data.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.