Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence for Processing Medical Images.
Authors
Affiliations (4)
Affiliations (4)
- Department of Pathophysiology, Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine. [email protected].
- Department of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology, University Hospital in Krakow, Krakow, Poland.
- National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland.
- Department of Internal Medicine N2, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools employ prompts and algorithms to perform tasks that typically require human expertise, hypothesis formulation, and critical evaluation. AI enables rapid analysis of complex imaging data, automates segmentation and lesion detection, and supports real-time image-guided interventions. Deep learning architectures (CNNs, RNNs, U-Net, and transformer-based models) facilitate advanced image classification, reconstruction, and interpretation, achieving clinical accuracies above 90% in multiple domains, including coronavirus disease 2019, oncology, and rheumatology. Generative AI platforms (MedGAN, StyleGAN, CycleGAN, SinGAN-Seg) further support synthetic image creation and dataset augmentation, mitigating data scarcity while preserving patient privacy. However, the integration of AI in healthcare presents significant ethical challenges. Key concerns include algorithmic bias, patient privacy, transparency, accountability, and equitable access. Biases-such as annotation, automation, confirmation, demographic, and feedback-loop bias-can compromise diagnostic reliability and patient outcomes. Ethical deployment requires rigorous data governance, informed consent, anonymization, standardized validation frameworks, human oversight, and regulatory compliance. Maintaining interpretability and transparency of AI outputs is essential for clinical decision-making, while professional training and AI literacy are critical to mitigate overreliance and ensure patient safety.