Back to all papers

Classifiers Combined with DenseNet Models for Lung Cancer Computed Tomography Image Classification: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors

Mahmoud MA,Wu S,Su R,Wen Y,Liu S,Guan Y

Affiliations (1)

  • Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Abstract

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. While deep learning approaches show promise in medical imaging, comprehensive comparisons of classifier combinations with DenseNet architectures for lung cancer classification are limited. The study investigates the performance of different classifier combinations, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), with DenseNet architectures for lung cancer classification using chest CT scan images. A comparative analysis was conducted on 1,000 chest CT scan images comprising Adenocarcinoma, Large Cell Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, and normal tissue samples. Three DenseNet variants (DenseNet-121, DenseNet-169, DenseNet-201) were combined with three classifiers: SVM, ANN, and MLP. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, Area Under the Curve (AUC), precision, recall, specificity, and F1- score with an 80-20 train-test split. The optimal model achieved 92% training accuracy and 83% test accuracy. Performance across models ranged from 81% to 92% for training accuracy and 73% to 83% for test accuracy. The most balanced combination demonstrated robust results (training: 85% accuracy, 0.99 AUC; test: 79% accuracy, 0.95 AUC) with minimal overfitting. Deep learning approaches effectively categorize chest CT scans for lung cancer detection. The MLP-DenseNet-169 combination's 83% test accuracy represents a promising benchmark. Limitations include retrospective design and a limited sample size from a single source. This evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of combining DenseNet architectures with different classifiers for lung cancer CT classification. The MLP-DenseNet-169 achieved optimal performance, while SVM-DenseNet-169 showed superior stability, providing valuable benchmarks for automated lung cancer detection systems.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.