Back to all papers

CEREBLEED: Automated Quantification and Severity Scoring of Intracranial Hemorrhage on Noncontrast CT.

April 3, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Cepeda S,Esteban-Sinovas O,Yüce M,Arrese I,Öztürk S,Sarabia R

Affiliations (4)

  • Neurovascular Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Río Hortega University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain.
  • Specialized Group in Biomedical Imaging and Computational Analysis (GEIBAC), Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Valladolid (IBioVALL), Valladolid, Spain.
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, New York, New York, USA.
  • Radiology Clinic, Esenler Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Abstract

Standardized interpretation of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) severity on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) is limited by the absence of objective, reproducible tools for quantifying lesion burden and its anatomic impact. We developed and externally validated a deep learning-based framework for automatic segmentation and volumetric quantification of ICH, deriving a quantitative Severity Index based on volumetric relations among hemorrhage subtypes and brain structures, and prospectively assessed its clinical applicability. A total of 2112 NCCT scans were analyzed: 1110 for training and internal evaluation (900 retrospective, 200 prospective) and 1002 from external data sets (503 hospital cohort, 499 public database). Three no-new U-Net segmentation models addressed total hemorrhage, subtype differentiation, and brain structure delineation. Segmentation performance was evaluated in internal and external cohorts using overlap and volumetric similarity metrics. The Severity Index was prospectively correlated with expert visual grading and its ability to predict urgent neurosurgical intervention. The total hemorrhage model achieved median Dice scores of 0.90 (95% CI 0.89-0.91) internally and 0.70 (0.69-0.71) externally, with volumetric similarity of 0.96 (0.95-0.97) and 0.83 (0.82-0.84), respectively. The Severity Index correlated with expert-rated severity (H = 39.6, P < .001; ε2 = 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.55) and predicted the need for neurosurgical intervention (area under the curve = 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.92). A threshold of ∼300 yielded sensitivity 0.87 (0.69-0.96) and specificity 0.83 (0.72-0.91). This framework provides standardized, interpretable quantification of ICH severity. The Severity Index may support surgical triage and improve interdisciplinary communication in acute neurocritical care.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.