Back to all papers

Diagnosis of Acromegaly.

April 29, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Yogi-Morren D,Chanson P

Affiliations (2)

  • Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Medical Specialty Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Physiologie et Physiopathologie Endocriniennes, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, Service d'Endocrinologie et des Maladies de la Reproduction, Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares de l'Hypophyse, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.

Abstract

The clinical presentation of acromegaly reflects systemic effects of chronic GH and IGF-I excess. Diagnostic delay frequently ranges from 6 to 10 years. While classical manifestations such as acral enlargement and facial coarsening are diagnostically important, many patients initially develop nonspecific symptoms, including sleep apnea, carpal tunnel syndrome, arthralgia, and metabolic disturbances. The lack of symptom/comorbidity specificity highlights the need for improved screening strategies, particularly for patients without overt acral changes. Comorbidity cluster analyses, potentially supported by artificial intelligence, may facilitate earlier identification, prompting biochemical confirmation of the diagnosis. Biochemical evaluation has benefited from advances in hormone assay harmonization and establishment of robust age-adjusted reference ranges. Serum IGF-I is the preferred initial screening test due to its stability and reflection of integrated GH secretion. However, interpretation of assay values should consider age, sex, assay variability, and confounding conditions such as diabetes, liver or renal disease, obesity, pregnancy, and estrogen exposure. For discordant biochemical and clinical findings, it is recommended to repeat IGF-I and to measure GH during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Although random GH levels are often elevated and correlate with somatotroph adenoma size, GH suppression during OGTT is the gold-standard confirmatory test, especially in patients with borderline results. The use of ultrasensitive GH assays has lowered the recommended nadir GH cut-off threshold to ∼0.4 µg/L, with assay-specific considerations. Advances in high-resolution MRI and PET/MRI, alongside AI-driven facial recognition, electronic medical record analysis, and radiomics, offer promising avenues for earlier and more accurate diagnosis of acromegaly.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.