AI-enabled obstetric point-of-care ultrasound as an emerging technology in low- and middle-income countries: provider and health system perspectives.
Authors
Affiliations (3)
Affiliations (3)
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. [email protected].
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. [email protected].
Abstract
In many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), widespread access to obstetric ultrasound is challenged by lack of trained providers, workload, and inadequate resources required for sustainability. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a powerful tool for automating image acquisition and interpretation and may help overcome these barriers. This study explored stakeholders' opinions about how AI-enabled point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) might change current antenatal care (ANC) services in LMICs and identified key considerations for introduction. We purposely sampled midwives, doctors, researchers, and implementors for this mixed methods study, with a focus on those who live or work in African LMICs. Individuals completed an anonymous web-based survey, then participated in an interview or focus group. Among the 41 participants, we captured demographics, experience with and perceptions of standard POCUS, and reactions to an AI-enabled POCUS prototype description. Qualitative data were analyzed by thematic content analysis and quantitative Likert and rank-order data were aggregated as frequencies; the latter was presented alongside illustrative quotes to highlight overall versus nuanced perceptions. The following themes emerged: (1) priority AI capabilities; (2) potential impact on ANC quality, services and clinical outcomes; (3) health system integration considerations; and (4) research priorities. First, AI-enabled POCUS elicited concerns around algorithmic accuracy and compromised clinical acumen due to over-reliance on AI, but an interest in gestational age automation. Second, there was overall agreement that both standard and AI-enabled POCUS could improve ANC attendance (75%, 65%, respectively), provider-client trust (82%, 60%), and providers' confidence in clinical decision-making (85%, 70%). AI consistently elicited more uncertainty among respondents. Third, health system considerations emerged including task sharing with midwives, ultrasound training delivery and curricular content, and policy-related issues such as data security and liability risks. For both standard and AI-enabled POCUS, clinical decision support and referral strengthening were deemed necessary to improve outcomes. Lastly, ranked priority research areas included algorithm accuracy across diverse populations and impact on ANC performance indicators; mortality indicators were less prioritized. Optimism that AI-enabled POCUS can increase access in settings with limited personnel and resources is coupled with expressions of caution and potential risks that warrant careful consideration and exploration.