Back to all papers

Chest Tube Learning Synthesis and Evaluation Assistant (CheLSEA): A Prospective Observational Trial of an Intelligent Decision Support System.

April 17, 2026pubmed logopapers

Authors

Arora N,Klement W,Japkowicz N,Jones DG,Maziak DE,Seely AJE,Sundaresan SR,Villeneuve PJ,Gilbert S

Affiliations (5)

  • Division of Thoracic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, ON, Canada.
  • Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, ON, Canada.
  • Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  • American University, Washington, DC, USA.

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of an artificial intelligence predictive clinical decision support system (CheLSEA) in generating chest tube management recommendations. From October 2020 to May 2021, 50 adult elective pulmonary resection patients with at least 24 h of chest tube drainage were enrolled in a single-arm, double-anonymized, observational study to evaluate CheLSEA's performance compared with standard chest tube care. Clinical status, digital pleural drainage data, and chest X-ray data were collected prospectively. For each query, CheLSEA generated a recommendation for chest tube removal or maintenance. If maintenance was recommended, CheLSEA generated a removal time prediction. Most patients were female (29 of 47, 62%), smokers (39 of 47, 83%), with a median age of 73 (interquartile range [IQR]: 66 to 77) years, who underwent minimally invasive (44 of 47, 94%) lobectomy (41 of 47, 87%) for primary non-small cell lung cancer (35 of 47, 75%). CheLSEA was queried 174 times, 21% (36 of 174) of which triggered the CheLSEA safeguard system, mostly due to grade 3 or increasing subcutaneous emphysema (20 of 36, 56%). CheLSEA recommended chest tube removal in 9% of remaining requests (12 of 138), 83% of which were safe (10 of 12) and 17% of which were premature by ≤6 h (2 of 12). The remaining 126 queries were answered with chest tube maintenance recommendations up to the optimal removal time (97 of 126, 77%) or shortly thereafter (29 of 126, 23%; median = 17 h, IQR: 17 to 22). When predicting chest tube removal time, 93% of responses (82 of 88) were accurate. CheLSEA provides safe chest tube management recommendations and can potentially enhance care by reliably emulating expert-level clinical guidance.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 11k+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.