Differentiation Between Fibro-Adipose Vascular Anomaly and Intramuscular Venous Malformation Using Grey-Scale Ultrasound-Based Radiomics and Machine Learning.

Authors

Hu WJ,Wu G,Yuan JJ,Ma BX,Liu YH,Guo XN,Dong CX,Kang H,Yang X,Li JC

Affiliations (5)

  • Department of Ultrasound, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Department of Hemangioma and Vascular Malformations, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Department of Pathology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Department of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Abstract

To establish an ultrasound-based radiomics model to differentiate fibro adipose vascular anomaly (FAVA) and intramuscular venous malformation (VM). The clinical data of 65 patients with VM and 31 patients with FAVA who were treated and pathologically confirmed were retrospectively analyzed. Dimensionality reduction was performed on these features using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). An ultrasound-based radiomics model was established using support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) models. The diagnostic efficiency of this model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic. A total of 851 features were obtained by feature extraction, and 311 features were screened out using the <i>t</i>-test and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test. The dimensionality reduction was performed on the remaining features using LASSO. Finally, seven features were included to establish the diagnostic prediction model. In the testing group, the AUC, accuracy and specificity of the SVM model were higher than those of the RF model (0.841 [0.815-0.867] vs. 0.791 [0.759-0.824], 96.6% vs. 93.1%, and 100.0% vs. 90.5%, respectively). However, the sensitivity of the SVM model was lower than that of the RF model (88.9% vs. 100.0%). In this study, a prediction model based on ultrasound radiomics was developed to distinguish FAVA from VM. The study achieved high classification accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. SVM model is superior to RF model and provides a new perspective and tool for clinical diagnosis.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.