Back to all papers

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-derived atrial fibrosis in patients with pre-atrial fibrillation.

November 27, 2025pubmed logopapers

Authors

Wahab A,Nadarajah R,Tomoaia R,Javed W,Reynolds C,Bennet S,Bhatty A,Lip GYH,Camm J,Wu J,Plein S,Swoboda P,Gale CP

Affiliations (9)

  • Leeds Institute of Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK [email protected].
  • Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Leeds Institute of Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK.
  • Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
  • Luliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
  • Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • City St George's University of London, London, UK.
  • Queen Mary University of London Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.

Abstract

Atrial fibrosis identified on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has been proposed as a preprocedural imaging biomarker for patient selection for rhythm control interventions in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether atrial fibrosis is present in patients considered as 'pre-AF' is unknown. We prospectively recruited 12 participants with pre-AF as defined by the Future Innovations in Novel Detection for Atrial Fibrillation (FIND-AF machine learning algorithm, without AF diagnosed during AF screening, and compared them to 25 participants with confirmed AF. All participants underwent CMR using a 3T system with left atrial fibrosis quantification and ADAS-3D left atrial image postprocessing software. Participants with pre-AF had smaller left atrial end-systolic (33.6±9.8 vs 43.0±17.0, p=0.003) and end-diastolic (16.5±8.7 vs 28.2±14.4, p=0.007) volumes, and higher left atrial ejection fraction (59.6±14.6 vs 40.7±17.5, p=0.005) than participants with AF. The extent of atrial fibrosis was not different between those with pre-AF and AF (borderzone (%) 5.2±5.0 vs 2.9±6.9, p=0.772; borderzone fibrosis (cm) 6.2±5.8 vs 6.8±10.7, p=0.927). CMR identifies atrial fibrosis before manifest AF in patients with pre-AF as defined by a machine learning algorithm.

Topics

Atrial FibrillationHeart AtriaMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineAtrial Function, LeftAtrial RemodelingJournal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Subscribe to join 7,600+ peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.