Reliability of minimally trained operator's left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral measurement guided by artificial intelligence: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Authors
Affiliations (8)
Affiliations (8)
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care & Perioperative Medicine, APHP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France [email protected].
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care & Perioperative Medicine, APHP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, APHP, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
- Clinical Research Unit, APHP, Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
- Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Limoges, France.
- Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, AP-HP, Paris, France.
- Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Abstract
Stroke volume is a major determinant of tissue perfusion and, therefore, a key parameter to monitor in patients with haemodynamic instability and hypoperfusion. Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity-time integral (VTI) measurement using pulsed-wave Doppler is widely used as an estimation of stroke volume and should be a competence required for every intensive care unit (ICU) physician. Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to ultrasound facilitates the acquisition of adequate images. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the interchangeability of LVOT VTI measurements obtained by minimally trained operators and expert physicians, both guided by AI. This is a prospective multicentre randomised controlled trial. ICU patients in whom fluid administration is considered necessary will be included. A minimally trained operator and an expert will independently measure LVOT VTI, guided by the UltraSight AI software to obtain the best five-chamber view, before and after a 250 mL fluid challenge. The order of acquisition between each operator will be randomised. 100 patients will be included.The primary endpoint is the relative difference in LVOT VTI between operators. Secondary outcomes include the concordance of the therapeutic decision made by the blinded physician in charge of the patient based on the measures obtained by each operator, and the agreement between absolute values of LVOT VTI obtained by minimally trained and expert operators. The study has been reviewed and approved by a regional ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes-Ile de France II-n°24.00671.000291). An information note will be given to the participant before he or she participates in the study. The present study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and academic and medical conferences. NCT06486467.