Evaluating Undersampling Schemes and Deep Learning Reconstructions for High-Resolution 3D Double Echo Steady State Knee Imaging at 7 T: A Comparison Between GRAPPA, CAIPIRINHA, and Compressed Sensing.
Authors
Affiliations (1)
Affiliations (1)
- Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthineers International AG, Zurich, Switzerland (C.v.D.); Swiss Center for Musculoskeletal Imaging, Balgrist Campus AG, Zurich, Switzerland (T.M., D.N., C.v.D.); Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Switzerland (T.M., A.A.M., G.W.K., R.S., D.N.); Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland (T.M., A.A.M., G.W.K., R.S.); and Research & Clinical Translation, Magnetic Resonance, Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany (M.D.N., D.P.).
Abstract
The 3-dimensional (3D) double echo steady state (DESS) magnetic resonance imaging sequence can image knee cartilage with high, isotropic resolution, particularly at high and ultra-high field strengths. Advanced undersampling techniques with high acceleration factors can provide the short acquisition times required for clinical use. However, the optimal undersampling scheme and its limits are unknown. High-resolution isotropic (reconstructed voxel size: 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.3 mm 3 ) 3D DESS images of 40 knees in 20 volunteers were acquired at 7 T with varying undersampling factors (R = 4-30) and schemes (regular: GRAPPA, CAIPIRINHA; incoherent: compressed sensing [CS]), whereas the remaining imaging parameters were kept constant. All imaging data were reconstructed with deep learning (DL) algorithms. Three readers rated image quality on a 4-point Likert scale. Four-fold accelerated GRAPPA was used as reference standard. Incidental cartilage lesions were graded on a modified Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS). Friedman's analysis of variance characterized rating differences. The interreader agreement was assessed using κ statistics. The quality of 16-fold accelerated CS images was not rated significantly different from that of 4-fold accelerated GRAPPA and 8-fold accelerated CAIPIRINHA images, whereas the corresponding data were acquired 4.5 and 2 times faster (01:12 min:s) than in 4-fold accelerated GRAPPA (5:22 min:s) and 8-fold accelerated CAIPIRINHA (2:22 min:s) acquisitions, respectively. Interreader agreement for incidental cartilage lesions was almost perfect for 4-fold accelerated GRAPPA (κ = 0.91), 8-fold accelerated CAIPIRINHA (κ = 0.86), and 8- to 16-fold accelerated CS (κ = 0.91). Our results suggest significant advantages of incoherent versus regular undersampling patterns for high-resolution 3D DESS cartilage imaging with high acceleration factors. The combination of CS undersampling with DL reconstruction enables fast, isotropic, high-resolution acquisitions without apparent impairment of image quality. Since DESS specific absorption rate values tend to be moderate, CS DESS with DL reconstruction promises potential for high-resolution assessment of cartilage morphology and other musculoskeletal anatomies at 7 T.