Prediction of functional outcome after traumatic brain injury: a narrative review.
Authors
Affiliations (3)
Affiliations (3)
- Neuroanesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta.
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milano.
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Abstract
To synthesize current evidence on prognostic factors, tools, and strategies influencing functional outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), with a focus on the acute and postacute phases of care. Key early predictors such as Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, pupillary reactivity, and computed tomography (CT) imaging findings remain fundamental in guiding clinical decision-making. Prognostic models like IMPACT and CRASH enhance early risk stratification, while outcome measures such as the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) provide structured long-term assessments. Despite their utility, heterogeneity in assessment approaches and treatment protocols continues to limit consistency in outcome predictions. Recent advancements highlight the value of fluid biomarkers like neurofilament light chain (NFL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), which offer promising avenues for improved accuracy. Additionally, artificial intelligence models are emerging as powerful tools to integrate complex datasets and refine individualized outcome forecasting. Neurological prognostication after TBI is evolving through the integration of clinical, radiological, molecular, and computational data. Although standardized models and scales remain foundational, emerging technologies and therapies - such as biomarkers, machine learning, and neurostimulants - represent a shift toward more personalized and actionable strategies to optimize recovery and long-term function.