An Unsupervised Learning Approach for Multimodal Low Back Pain Stratification.
Authors
Affiliations (3)
Affiliations (3)
- Research Unit of Health Sciences & Technology, University of Oulu, Finland.
- Wellbeing Services County of South Karelia, Lappeenranta, Finland.
- Dept. of Diagnostic Radiology, University Oulu Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Abstract
Cross-sectional study. This study proposes a novel stratification framework for individuals with low back pain (LBP). The method integrates Northern Finland Birth Cohort data comprising imaging biomarkers from deep learning (DL)-based analysis of lumbar spine MRI with the data on smoking status, demographics (sex, BMI), self-reported data from Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ) short and the STarT Back Tool (SBT). Furthermore, the utility of this stratified approach was validated by demonstrating a superior net benefit compared to "treat-all" strategy. Current risk stratification for individuals with LBP relies on ÖMPSQ short and SBT among others. While these tools are invaluable for capturing psychosocial characteristics predictive of future disability and functional outcomes, LBP's multifactorial nature necessitates a more comprehensive framework for effective risk stratification. A method for multimodal unsupervised patient stratification has been developed that allows for the integration of imaging biomarkers of disc degeneration (DD) and facet tropism (FT), extracted using DL models, with non-imaging data. The framework utilized robust K-Means clustering to stratify individuals. Clusters were characterized using LBP frequency and bothersomeness, and their robustness was validated with a multi-class logistic regression model. Net benefit was assessed through decision curve analysis. Three distinct subgroups were characterized by LBP frequency and bothersomeness. One subgroup was dominated by psychosocial characteristics (psychosocial risk P<0.05), the second by physical degenerative changes (DD P<0.05), and the third by a mix of both. Predictive models for cluster assignment were robust, achieving high mean accuracies (SBT-based: 0.89; ÖMPSQ-short-based: 0.87). The net benefit is superior throughout a range of threshold probabilities compared to a "treat-all" strategy. A novel framework was developed that integrates multimodal data to identify distinct subgroups differentiated by their physical and psychosocial characteristics in a population-based cohort, demonstrating potential for advancing personalized care.