Back to all papers

A streamlined CMR-derived machine-learning model for estimating cardiovascular biological age: development and validation in the UK-Biobank and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

December 4, 2025pubmed logopapers

Authors

Masci PG,Andreozzi G,Puyol-Anton E,Abdollahi A,Mospan R,Ruijsink B,Cecilja M,Chowienczyk P,Mohamed AT,Young A,Ambale B,Chiribiri A,Tison G,Steves CJ,Lima J,Razavi R,Lorenzoni V,King A

Affiliations (10)

  • School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London - United Kingdom.
  • British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence - King's College  London  United Kingdom.
  • Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna - Italy.
  • Division of Cardiology, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland - United States of America.
  • Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London - United Kingdom.
  • School of Cardiovascular Medicine & Metabolic Medicine & Sciences, King's College London, London - United Kingdom.
  • GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London - United Kingdom.
  • Faculty of Public Health and Policy, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London - United Kingdom.
  • Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland - United States of America.
  • Center for Biosignal Research, University of California, San Francisco, California - United States of America.

Abstract

Current models predicting cardiovascular biological age rely on radiomics or complex large feature sets including T1 and strain. We developed and validated a machine learning-based cardiovascular biological age estimate (HeartAge) using cardiovascular-magnetic-resonance (CMR) phenotypes and assessed the prognostic value of its deviation from chronological age (HeartAge-gap) for cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. HeartAge was developed using gradient-boosting regression in 3,760 healthy UK-Biobank participants based on readily extractable CMR phenotypes. HeartAge-gap was defined as the difference between HeartAge and chronological age. The association of HeartAge-gap with prevalent cardiovascular conditions and composite cardiovascular outcome or all-cause mortality was tested in 31,784 UK-Biobank participants (64±7 years; 16,640 females) and validated in 897 Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) participants (60±10 years; 472 females) using logistic and Cox regression, respectively.Over a median 5.5-year follow-up (IQR:4.7-7.1), 2,316 (7.3%) and 363 (1.1%) participants experienced the composite cardiovascular outcome and all-cause mortality, respectively. Each one-year increase in HeartAge-gap, was associated with the composite cardiovascular outcome in females (HR:1.022, 95%CI:1.001-1.044, P=0.048) and males (HR:1.017, 95%CI:1.002-1.033, P=0.027) independently of chronological age and confounders including, body-mass-index, ischaemic heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension. In females only, increased HeartAge-gap predicted all-cause mortality (HR:1.061, 95%CI:1.007-1.118, P=0.027), regardless of chronological age. In female MESA participants only, increased HeartAge-gap predicted the cardiovascular outcome (HR:1.113, 95%CI:1.025-1.210, P=0.011) independently of chronological age and other confounders. A biologically older cardiovascular system was independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes across both sexes. In females, advanced cardiovascular ageing also predicts all-cause mortality, irrespective of chronological age.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.