Standardized pancreatic MRI-T1 measurement methods: comparison between manual measurement and a semi-automated pipeline with automatic quality control.

Authors

Triay Bagur A,Arya Z,Waddell T,Pansini M,Fernandes C,Counter D,Jackson E,Thomaides-Brears HB,Robson MD,Bulte DP,Banerjee R,Aljabar P,Brady M

Affiliations (4)

  • Perspectum Ltd, Oxford OX4 2LL, United Kingdom.
  • Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, United Kingdom.
  • Clinica Di Radiologia EOC, Istituto Di Imaging Della Svizzera Italiana (IIMSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano 6900, Switzerland.
  • Department of Radiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 0AG, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Scanner-referenced T1 (srT1) is a method for measuring pancreas T1 relaxation time. The purpose of this multi-centre study is 2-fold: (1) to evaluate the repeatability of manual ROI-based analysis of srT1, (2) to validate a semi-automated measurement method with an automatic quality control (QC) module to identify likely discrepancies between automated and manual measurements. Pancreatic MRI scans from a scan-rescan cohort (46 subjects) were used to evaluate the repeatability of manual analysis. Seven hundred and eight scans from a longitudinal multi-centre study of 466 subjects were divided into training, internal validation (IV), and external validation (EV) cohorts. A semi-automated method for measuring srT1 using machine learning is proposed and compared against manual analysis on the validation cohorts with and without automated QC. Inter-operator agreement between manual ROI-based method and semi-automated method had low bias (3.8 ms or 0.5%) and limits of agreement [-36.6, 44.1] ms. There was good agreement between the 2 methods without automated QC (IV: 3.2 [-47.1, 53.5] ms, EV: -0.5 [-35.2, 34.2] ms). After QC, agreement on the IV set improved, was unchanged in the EV set, and the agreement in both was within inter-operator bounds (IV: -0.04 [-33.4, 33.3] ms, EV: -1.9 [-37.6, 33.7] ms). The semi-automated method improved scan-rescan agreement versus manual analysis (manual: 8.2 [-49.7, 66] ms, automated: 6.7 [-46.7, 60.1] ms). The semi-automated method for characterization of standardized pancreatic T1 using MRI has the potential to decrease analysis time while maintaining accuracy and improving scan-rescan agreement. We provide intra-operator, inter-operator, and scan-rescan agreement values for manual measurement of srT1, a standardized biomarker for measuring pancreas fibro-inflammation. Applying a semi-automated measurement method improves scan-rescan agreement and agrees well with manual measurements, while reducing human effort. Adding automated QC can improve agreement between manual and automated measurements. We describe a method for semi-automated, standardized measurement of pancreatic T1 (srT1), which includes automated quality control. Measurements show good agreement with manual ROI-based analysis, with comparable consistency to inter-operator performance.

Topics

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPancreasJournal ArticleMulticenter StudyComparative Study

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.