Deep learning models for deriving optimised measures of fat and muscle mass from MRI.

Authors

Thomas B,Ali MA,Ali FMH,Chung A,Joshi M,Maiguma-Wilson S,Reiff G,Said H,Zalmay P,Berks M,Blackledge MD,O'Connor JPB

Affiliations (8)

  • Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. [email protected].
  • Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
  • Radiology Department, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Radiology Department, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK.
  • Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. [email protected].
  • Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. [email protected].
  • Radiology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. [email protected].

Abstract

Fat and muscle mass are potential biomarkers of wellbeing and disease in oncology, but clinical measurement methods vary considerably. Here we evaluate the accuracy, precision and ability to track change for multiple deep learning (DL) models that quantify fat and muscle mass from abdominal MRI. Specifically, subcutaneous fat (SF), intra-abdominal fat (VF), external muscle (EM) and psoas muscle (PM) were evaluated using 15 convolutional neural network (CNN)-based and 4 transformer-based deep learning model architectures. There was negligible difference in the accuracy of human observers and all deep learning models in delineating SF or EM. Both of these tissues had excellent repeatability of their delineation. VF was measured most accurately by the human observers, then by CNN-based models, which outperformed transformer-based models. In distinction, PM delineation accuracy and repeatability was poor for all assessments. Repeatability limits of agreement determined when changes measured in individual patients were due to real change rather than test-retest variation. In summary, DL model accuracy and precision of delineating fat and muscle volumes varies between CNN-based and transformer-based models, between different tissues and in some cases with gender. These factors should be considered when investigators deploy deep learning methods to estimate biomarkers of fat and muscle mass.

Topics

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMuscle, SkeletalIntra-Abdominal FatAdipose TissueJournal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.