Back to all papers

Enhancing the Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer through Habitat-Based Radiomics and Voting Algorithms.

Authors

Chen Y,Liu N,Lin R,Huang D,Pan L,Chen X,Tang M,Zhan L,Huang Y,Chen J,Huang P,Tang L

Affiliations (4)

  • Department of Ultrasound, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
  • College of Physics and Information Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.
  • Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Department of Ultrasound, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China. Electronic address: [email protected].

Abstract

To develop a machine learning model integrating habitat-based radiomics and voting algorithms for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in breast cancer using B-mode and contrast-enhanced ultrasound images. This retrospective study included 246 T1/T2 stage breast cancer patients (246 lesions) from Fujian Cancer Hospital (2016.04-2022.12). Lesions were randomly divided into training (n = 197) and testing (n = 49) datasets. A Gaussian Mixture Model partitioned B-mode ultrasound images into three subregions. Radiomics features, including shape features, first-order features, and texture features, were extracted from whole-tumor (B-mode and CEUS) and subregional (B-mode) ROIs. Multiple classifiers were applied to evaluate the model's diagnostic performance. Voting algorithms were used to integrate habitat-based radiomics, traditional radiomics, and clinical information for model optimization. Diagnostic performance was assessed via accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. Feature extraction yielded 899 features per ROI, including tumor subregions, enhancing prediction robustness. On the testing set, the combined habitat-based model (Habitat-CEUS-Clinical model) achieved an accuracy of 87.76% (95% CI: 0.775, 0.944) and a false positive rate of 7.41% (95% CI: 0.019, 0.202) using hard voting, outperforming single models by 12.25% in terms of accuracy. In comparison, the traditional approach (Whole-CEUS-Clinical model) reached an accuracy of 79.59% (95% CI: 0.678, 0.884). The difference between the Habitat-CEUS-Clinical model and the Whole-CEUS-Clinical model was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Habitat-based radiomics captures tumor heterogeneity more effectively than conventional methods. Dual-modality ultrasound combined with voting algorithms significantly improves ALNM prediction, providing a reliable foundation for computer-aided preoperative planning in breast cancer.

Topics

Journal Article

Ready to Sharpen Your Edge?

Join hundreds of your peers who rely on RadAI Slice. Get the essential weekly briefing that empowers you to navigate the future of radiology.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.