Patient-specific deep learning tracking for real-time 2D pancreas localisation in kV-guided radiotherapy.
Authors
Affiliations (4)
Affiliations (4)
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia.
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
- ACRF Image X Institute, The University of Sydney, Eveleigh, NSW 2015, Australia.
- School of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
Abstract
In pancreatic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), accurate motion management is crucial for the safe delivery of high doses per fraction. Intra-fraction tracking with magnetic resonance imaging-guidance for gated SBRT has shown potential for improved local control. Visualisation of pancreas (and surrounding organs) remains challenging in intra-fraction kilo-voltage (kV) imaging, requiring implanted fiducials. In this study, we investigate patient-specific deep-learning approaches to track the gross-tumour-volume (GTV), pancreas-head and the whole-pancreas in intra-fraction kV images. Conditional-generative-adversarial-networks were trained and tested on data from 25 patients enrolled in an ethics-approved pancreatic SBRT trial for contour prediction on intra-fraction 2D kV images. Labelled digitally-reconstructed-radiographs (DRRs) were generated from contoured planning-computed-tomography (CTs) (CT-DRRs) and cone-beam-CTs (CBCT-DRRs). A population model was trained using CT-DRRs of 19 patients. Two patient-specific model types were created for six additional patients by fine-tuning the population model using CBCT-DRRs (CBCT-models) or CT-DRRs (CT-models) acquired in exhale-breath-hold. Model predictions on unseen triggered-kV images from the corresponding six patients were evaluated against projected-contours using Dice-Similarity-Coefficient (DSC), centroid-error (CE), average Hausdorff-distance (AHD), and Hausdorff-distance at 95th-percentile (HD95). The mean ± 1SD (standard-deviation) DSCs were 0.86 ± 0.09 (CBCT-models) and 0.78 ± 0.12 (CT-models). For AHD and CE, the CBCT-model predicted contours within 2.0 mm ≥90.3 % of the time, while HD95 was within 5.0 mm ≥90.0 % of the time, and had a prediction time of 29.2 ± 3.7 ms per contour. The patient-specific CBCT-models outperformed the CT-models and predicted the three contours with 90th-percentile error ≤2.0 mm, indicating the potential for clinical real-time application.