Accelerating cardiac radial-MRI: Fully polar based technique using compressed sensing and deep learning.
Authors
Affiliations (3)
Affiliations (3)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: [email protected].
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
Abstract
Fast radial-MRI approaches based on compressed sensing (CS) and deep learning (DL) often use non-uniform fast Fourier transform (NUFFT) as the forward imaging operator, which might introduce interpolation errors and reduce image quality. Using the polar Fourier transform (PFT), we developed fully polar CS and DL algorithms for fast 2D cardiac radial-MRI. Our methods directly reconstruct images in polar spatial space from polar k-space data, eliminating frequency interpolation and ensuring an easy-to-compute data consistency term for the DL framework via the variable splitting (VS) scheme. Furthermore, PFT reconstruction produces initial images with fewer artifacts in a reduced field of view, making it a better starting point for CS and DL algorithms, especially for dynamic imaging, where information from a small region of interest is critical, as opposed to NUFFT, which often results in global streaking artifacts. In the cardiac region, PFT-based CS technique outperformed NUFFT-based CS at acceleration rates of 5x (mean SSIM: 0.8831 vs. 0.8526), 10x (0.8195 vs. 0.7981), and 15x (0.7720 vs. 0.7503). Our PFT(VS)-DL technique outperformed the NUFFT(GD)-based DL method, which used unrolled gradient descent with the NUFFT as the forward imaging operator, with mean SSIM scores of 0.8914 versus 0.8617 at 10x and 0.8470 versus 0.8301 at 15x. Radiological assessments revealed that PFT(VS)-based DL scored 2.9±0.30 and 2.73±0.45 at 5x and 10x, whereas NUFFT(GD)-based DL scored 2.7±0.47 and 2.40±0.50, respectively. Our methods suggest a promising alternative to NUFFT-based fast radial-MRI for dynamic imaging, prioritizing reconstruction quality in a small region of interest over whole image quality.